影响宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术手术时间的手术参数:一项回顾性纵向研究的结果。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07877-5
Gaetano Riemma, Salvatore Giovanni Vitale, Márton György Lipták, Michał Ciebiera, Bence Zoltán Boldogh, Liliana Mereu, Kincső Sára Kovács, Péter Török
{"title":"影响宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术手术时间的手术参数:一项回顾性纵向研究的结果。","authors":"Gaetano Riemma,&nbsp;Salvatore Giovanni Vitale,&nbsp;Márton György Lipták,&nbsp;Michał Ciebiera,&nbsp;Bence Zoltán Boldogh,&nbsp;Liliana Mereu,&nbsp;Kincső Sára Kovács,&nbsp;Péter Török","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07877-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To identify and analyze the main surgical parameters affecting the operative time of hysteroscopic fibroid resection.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective observational study included 65 cases of outpatient hysteroscopic fibroid resection performed between March 2021 and May 2023 in outpatient office setting. Patients aged 18–50 with various indications such as infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, or abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) were included. The operative time, fibroid size, FIGO classification, and fibroid localization were recorded and analyzed using ANOVA, Chi-square test, and linear regression models.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The average operative duration for all surgeries was 557.41 (± 449.52) s. A significant correlation between fibroid size and operative time was found in FIGO 0 (<i>p</i> = 0.0003) and FIGO 1 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) subgroups, with weaker correlation in FIGO II (<i>p</i> = 0.039). FIGO I surgeries took significantly longer than FIGO 0 (<i>p</i> = 0.044), and fundal fibroids were associated with longer operative times compared to posterior fibroids (<i>p</i> = 0.0329).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The size and FIGO classification of fibroids significantly influence operative time during hysteroscopic resection. Smaller and more accessible fibroids (FIGO 0 and 1) are resected faster than those embedded deeper in the uterine wall (FIGO 2). Detailed preoperative evaluation of fibroid characteristics can better predict operative time, aiding in patient preparation and optimized analgesia and perioperative planning as well as optimizing the use of operating theater. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to validate these findings and explore additional influencing factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"311 1","pages":"91 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical parameters affecting procedure duration of hysteroscopic fibroid resection: results of a retrospective longitudinal study\",\"authors\":\"Gaetano Riemma,&nbsp;Salvatore Giovanni Vitale,&nbsp;Márton György Lipták,&nbsp;Michał Ciebiera,&nbsp;Bence Zoltán Boldogh,&nbsp;Liliana Mereu,&nbsp;Kincső Sára Kovács,&nbsp;Péter Török\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07877-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To identify and analyze the main surgical parameters affecting the operative time of hysteroscopic fibroid resection.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective observational study included 65 cases of outpatient hysteroscopic fibroid resection performed between March 2021 and May 2023 in outpatient office setting. Patients aged 18–50 with various indications such as infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, or abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) were included. The operative time, fibroid size, FIGO classification, and fibroid localization were recorded and analyzed using ANOVA, Chi-square test, and linear regression models.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The average operative duration for all surgeries was 557.41 (± 449.52) s. A significant correlation between fibroid size and operative time was found in FIGO 0 (<i>p</i> = 0.0003) and FIGO 1 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) subgroups, with weaker correlation in FIGO II (<i>p</i> = 0.039). FIGO I surgeries took significantly longer than FIGO 0 (<i>p</i> = 0.044), and fundal fibroids were associated with longer operative times compared to posterior fibroids (<i>p</i> = 0.0329).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The size and FIGO classification of fibroids significantly influence operative time during hysteroscopic resection. Smaller and more accessible fibroids (FIGO 0 and 1) are resected faster than those embedded deeper in the uterine wall (FIGO 2). Detailed preoperative evaluation of fibroid characteristics can better predict operative time, aiding in patient preparation and optimized analgesia and perioperative planning as well as optimizing the use of operating theater. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to validate these findings and explore additional influencing factors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\"311 1\",\"pages\":\"91 - 98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-024-07877-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-024-07877-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨和分析影响宫腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术时间的主要手术参数。方法:本回顾性观察研究纳入了2021年3月至2023年5月在门诊进行的65例宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术。患者年龄在18-50岁,有各种适应症,如不孕症、复发性妊娠丢失或子宫异常出血(AUB)。记录手术时间、肌瘤大小、FIGO分类、肌瘤定位,采用方差分析、卡方检验和线性回归模型进行分析。结果:所有手术的平均手术时间为557.41(±449.52)s, FIGO 0和FIGO 1的子宫肌瘤大小与手术时间有显著相关性(p = 0.0003)。结论:子宫肌瘤的大小和FIGO分型对宫腔镜手术时间有显著影响。较小和更容易接近的肌瘤(FIGO 0和FIGO 1)比嵌入子宫壁较深的肌瘤(FIGO 2)切除更快。详细的术前肌瘤特征评估可以更好地预测手术时间,有助于患者准备,优化镇痛和围手术期计划,优化手术室的使用。建议采用更大样本量的进一步研究来验证这些发现并探索其他影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surgical parameters affecting procedure duration of hysteroscopic fibroid resection: results of a retrospective longitudinal study

Purpose

To identify and analyze the main surgical parameters affecting the operative time of hysteroscopic fibroid resection.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 65 cases of outpatient hysteroscopic fibroid resection performed between March 2021 and May 2023 in outpatient office setting. Patients aged 18–50 with various indications such as infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, or abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) were included. The operative time, fibroid size, FIGO classification, and fibroid localization were recorded and analyzed using ANOVA, Chi-square test, and linear regression models.

Results

The average operative duration for all surgeries was 557.41 (± 449.52) s. A significant correlation between fibroid size and operative time was found in FIGO 0 (p = 0.0003) and FIGO 1 (p < 0.0001) subgroups, with weaker correlation in FIGO II (p = 0.039). FIGO I surgeries took significantly longer than FIGO 0 (p = 0.044), and fundal fibroids were associated with longer operative times compared to posterior fibroids (p = 0.0329).

Conclusion

The size and FIGO classification of fibroids significantly influence operative time during hysteroscopic resection. Smaller and more accessible fibroids (FIGO 0 and 1) are resected faster than those embedded deeper in the uterine wall (FIGO 2). Detailed preoperative evaluation of fibroid characteristics can better predict operative time, aiding in patient preparation and optimized analgesia and perioperative planning as well as optimizing the use of operating theater. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to validate these findings and explore additional influencing factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
期刊最新文献
The outcome of early perineal rehabilitation in obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a single-center experience. Comparison of complications and surgery outcomes in skin closure methods following cesarean sections. Impact of a new image enhancement technology on the nuchal translucency thickness. The effect of intrapartum deinfibulation on obstetric outcomes and postpartum sexual function in pregnant women with Type 3 Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. Unmet clinical needs in women with polycystic ovary syndrome regarding fertility and obesity: a cross-sectional study from the patient's perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1