沙特阿拉伯医疗保健专业人员对人工智能采用的担忧:一项横断面调查研究。

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING Nursing Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.3390/nursrep14040271
Abdulaziz R Alsaedi, Nada Alneami, Fahad Almajnoni, Ohoud Alamri, Khulud Aljohni, Maha K Alrwaily, Meshal Eid, Abdulaziz Budayr, Maram A Alrehaili, Marha M Alghamdi, Eqab D Almutairi, Mohammed H Eid
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯医疗保健专业人员对人工智能采用的担忧:一项横断面调查研究。","authors":"Abdulaziz R Alsaedi, Nada Alneami, Fahad Almajnoni, Ohoud Alamri, Khulud Aljohni, Maha K Alrwaily, Meshal Eid, Abdulaziz Budayr, Maram A Alrehaili, Marha M Alghamdi, Eqab D Almutairi, Mohammed H Eid","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of AI in the healthcare sector is facing some formidable concerns raised by the practitioners themselves. This study aimed to establish the concerns that surround the adoption of AI among Saudi Arabian healthcare professionals. Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional study using stratified convenience sampling from September to November 2024 across health facilities. This study included all licensed healthcare professionals practicing for at least one year, whereas interns and administrative staff were excluded from the research. Data collection was conducted through a 33-item validated questionnaire that was provided in paper form and online. The questionnaire measured AI awareness with eight items, past experience with five items, and concerns in four domains represented by 20 items. Four hundred questionnaires were distributed, and the response rate was 78.5% (<i>n</i> = 314). The majority of the participants were females (52.5%), Saudis (89.2%), and employees of MOH (77.1%). The mean age for the participants was 35.6 ± 7.8 years. Quantitative analysis revealed high AI awareness scores with a mean of 3.96 ± 0.167, <i>p</i> < 0.001, and low previous experience scores with a mean of 2.65 ± 0.292. Data management-related worries came out as the top worry, with a mean of 3.78 ± 0.259, while the poor data entry impact topped with a mean of 4.15 ± 0.801; healthcare provider-related worries with a mean of 3.71 ± 0.182; and regulation/ethics-related worries with a mean of 3.67 ± 0.145. Health professionals' main concerns about AI adoption were related to data reliability and impacts on clinical decision-making, which significantly hindered successful AI integration in healthcare. These are the particular concerns that, if addressed through robust data management protocols and enhanced processes for clinical validation, will afford the best implementation of AI technology in an optimized way to bring better quality and safety to healthcare. Quantitative validation of AI outcomes and the development of standardized integration frameworks are subjects for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3706-3721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11677610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Worries in the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence Among Healthcare Professionals in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulaziz R Alsaedi, Nada Alneami, Fahad Almajnoni, Ohoud Alamri, Khulud Aljohni, Maha K Alrwaily, Meshal Eid, Abdulaziz Budayr, Maram A Alrehaili, Marha M Alghamdi, Eqab D Almutairi, Mohammed H Eid\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep14040271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of AI in the healthcare sector is facing some formidable concerns raised by the practitioners themselves. This study aimed to establish the concerns that surround the adoption of AI among Saudi Arabian healthcare professionals. Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional study using stratified convenience sampling from September to November 2024 across health facilities. This study included all licensed healthcare professionals practicing for at least one year, whereas interns and administrative staff were excluded from the research. Data collection was conducted through a 33-item validated questionnaire that was provided in paper form and online. The questionnaire measured AI awareness with eight items, past experience with five items, and concerns in four domains represented by 20 items. Four hundred questionnaires were distributed, and the response rate was 78.5% (<i>n</i> = 314). The majority of the participants were females (52.5%), Saudis (89.2%), and employees of MOH (77.1%). The mean age for the participants was 35.6 ± 7.8 years. Quantitative analysis revealed high AI awareness scores with a mean of 3.96 ± 0.167, <i>p</i> < 0.001, and low previous experience scores with a mean of 2.65 ± 0.292. Data management-related worries came out as the top worry, with a mean of 3.78 ± 0.259, while the poor data entry impact topped with a mean of 4.15 ± 0.801; healthcare provider-related worries with a mean of 3.71 ± 0.182; and regulation/ethics-related worries with a mean of 3.67 ± 0.145. Health professionals' main concerns about AI adoption were related to data reliability and impacts on clinical decision-making, which significantly hindered successful AI integration in healthcare. These are the particular concerns that, if addressed through robust data management protocols and enhanced processes for clinical validation, will afford the best implementation of AI technology in an optimized way to bring better quality and safety to healthcare. Quantitative validation of AI outcomes and the development of standardized integration frameworks are subjects for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"3706-3721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11677610/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能在医疗保健领域的应用正面临着从业者自己提出的一些可怕的担忧。本研究旨在确定围绕沙特阿拉伯医疗保健专业人员采用人工智能的担忧。材料和方法:这是一项横断面研究,采用分层方便抽样,于2024年9月至11月在卫生机构进行。本研究包括所有执业至少一年的持证医疗保健专业人员,而实习生和行政人员被排除在研究之外。数据收集是通过一份包含33个项目的有效问卷进行的,该问卷以纸质形式和在线形式提供。该问卷用8个项目衡量人工智能意识,用5个项目衡量过去的经验,用20个项目衡量对4个领域的关注。共发放问卷400份,回复率为78.5% (n = 314)。大多数参与者是女性(52.5%),沙特人(89.2%)和卫生部雇员(77.1%)。参与者的平均年龄为35.6±7.8岁。定量分析显示,人工智能认知得分高,平均为3.96±0.167,p < 0.001,以往经验得分低,平均为2.65±0.292。与数据管理相关的担忧以3.78±0.259的平均值位居首位,而数据输入不良的影响以4.15±0.801的平均值位居首位;与医疗服务提供者相关的担忧,平均值为3.71±0.182;与监管/伦理相关的担忧平均为3.67±0.145。卫生专业人员对人工智能采用的主要担忧与数据可靠性和对临床决策的影响有关,这严重阻碍了人工智能在医疗保健领域的成功整合。如果通过强大的数据管理协议和增强的临床验证流程来解决这些特殊问题,将以优化的方式提供人工智能技术的最佳实施,从而为医疗保健带来更好的质量和安全性。人工智能成果的定量验证和标准化集成框架的开发是未来研究的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceived Worries in the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence Among Healthcare Professionals in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

The use of AI in the healthcare sector is facing some formidable concerns raised by the practitioners themselves. This study aimed to establish the concerns that surround the adoption of AI among Saudi Arabian healthcare professionals. Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional study using stratified convenience sampling from September to November 2024 across health facilities. This study included all licensed healthcare professionals practicing for at least one year, whereas interns and administrative staff were excluded from the research. Data collection was conducted through a 33-item validated questionnaire that was provided in paper form and online. The questionnaire measured AI awareness with eight items, past experience with five items, and concerns in four domains represented by 20 items. Four hundred questionnaires were distributed, and the response rate was 78.5% (n = 314). The majority of the participants were females (52.5%), Saudis (89.2%), and employees of MOH (77.1%). The mean age for the participants was 35.6 ± 7.8 years. Quantitative analysis revealed high AI awareness scores with a mean of 3.96 ± 0.167, p < 0.001, and low previous experience scores with a mean of 2.65 ± 0.292. Data management-related worries came out as the top worry, with a mean of 3.78 ± 0.259, while the poor data entry impact topped with a mean of 4.15 ± 0.801; healthcare provider-related worries with a mean of 3.71 ± 0.182; and regulation/ethics-related worries with a mean of 3.67 ± 0.145. Health professionals' main concerns about AI adoption were related to data reliability and impacts on clinical decision-making, which significantly hindered successful AI integration in healthcare. These are the particular concerns that, if addressed through robust data management protocols and enhanced processes for clinical validation, will afford the best implementation of AI technology in an optimized way to bring better quality and safety to healthcare. Quantitative validation of AI outcomes and the development of standardized integration frameworks are subjects for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
相关文献
二甲双胍通过HDAC6和FoxO3a转录调控肌肉生长抑制素诱导肌肉萎缩
IF 8.9 1区 医学Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and MusclePub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12833
Min Ju Kang, Ji Wook Moon, Jung Ok Lee, Ji Hae Kim, Eun Jeong Jung, Su Jin Kim, Joo Yeon Oh, Sang Woo Wu, Pu Reum Lee, Sun Hwa Park, Hyeon Soo Kim
具有疾病敏感单倍型的非亲属供体脐带血移植后的1型糖尿病
IF 3.2 3区 医学Journal of Diabetes InvestigationPub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13939
Kensuke Matsumoto, Taisuke Matsuyama, Ritsu Sumiyoshi, Matsuo Takuji, Tadashi Yamamoto, Ryosuke Shirasaki, Haruko Tashiro
封面:蛋白质组学分析确定IRSp53和fastin是PRV输出和直接细胞-细胞传播的关键
IF 3.4 4区 生物学ProteomicsPub Date : 2019-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201970201
Fei-Long Yu, Huan Miao, Jinjin Xia, Fan Jia, Huadong Wang, Fuqiang Xu, Lin Guo
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge Assessment of Hospital Nursing Staff in Saudi Arabia Regarding Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study. The Benefits of Caring Massage® for Patients and Nurses: A Delphi Study. Bridging the Gap: A Phenomenological Study of Transfer Students' Journey into Professional Nursing. A Scoping Review Protocol: Parenting Experiences and Family Dynamics in Pediatric Burn Care Settings from Hospitalization to the Return Home. Vocation of Human Care and Soft Skills in Nursing and Physiotherapy Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1