欧洲儿童和青少年离焦合并多段(DIMS)和高度非球面透镜(HAL)眼镜近视控制效果的比较

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS BMJ Paediatrics Open Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003187
Andrea Lembo, Irene Schiavetti, Massimiliano Serafino, Roberto Caputo, Paolo Nucci
{"title":"欧洲儿童和青少年离焦合并多段(DIMS)和高度非球面透镜(HAL)眼镜近视控制效果的比较","authors":"Andrea Lembo, Irene Schiavetti, Massimiliano Serafino, Roberto Caputo, Paolo Nucci","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A performance comparison of two myopia control spectacle lens designs, defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) and highly aspherical lenslets (HAL), at slowing myopia progression in a European child/adolescent population. Previous research directly comparing these designs has been limited to Chinese participants and 1-year follow-up. The prevalence of myopia in European child/adolescent has been estimated at 22.60%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of individuals (6-17 years) with myopia progression. Participants wore DIMS (Hoya MiyoSmart) or HAL (Essilor Stellest) spectacles for a minimum of 2 years. Axial length (AL) and cycloplegic autorefraction (spherical equivalent refraction (SER)) were measured at baseline and 1 and 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean 1-year SER changes for DIMS were -0.34D (±0.46 SD) and HAL -0.30D (±0.30); 2-year changes for DIMS were -0.50D (±0.64 SD) and HAL -0.63D (±0.56). Mean 1-year AL increases for DIMS were 0.19 mm (±0.56) and HAL 0.15 mm (±0.47); 2-year increases for DIMS were 0.29 mm (±0.63) and HAL 0.32 mm (±0.72). For equivalence margins of 0.25D and 0.50D for SER at 1 and 2 years, respectively, and similarly 0.20 mm and 0.30 mm margins for AL, DIMS and HAL lenses were equivalent apart from AL at 1 year where the 0.21 mm 95% CI upper limit just exceeded 0.20 mm. At both 1 and 2 years, none of the differences in mean SERs or ALs between DIMS and HAL were clinically or statistically significant (p≥0.05 Mann-Whitney U test). Using linear mixed model analysis, the interaction between lens type and time did not significantly affect SER or AL at 1- or 2-year follow-up (p≥0.05). 38.4% of children/adolescents with DIMS had no SER progression at 2 years, compared with 21.9% with HAL (p=0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a European population, DIMS and HAL lenses are essentially equivalent in their ability to reduce myopia progression and AL elongation over a 2-year follow-up period.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the performance of myopia control in European children and adolescents with defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) and highly aspherical lenslets (HAL) spectacles.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Lembo, Irene Schiavetti, Massimiliano Serafino, Roberto Caputo, Paolo Nucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A performance comparison of two myopia control spectacle lens designs, defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) and highly aspherical lenslets (HAL), at slowing myopia progression in a European child/adolescent population. Previous research directly comparing these designs has been limited to Chinese participants and 1-year follow-up. The prevalence of myopia in European child/adolescent has been estimated at 22.60%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of individuals (6-17 years) with myopia progression. Participants wore DIMS (Hoya MiyoSmart) or HAL (Essilor Stellest) spectacles for a minimum of 2 years. Axial length (AL) and cycloplegic autorefraction (spherical equivalent refraction (SER)) were measured at baseline and 1 and 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean 1-year SER changes for DIMS were -0.34D (±0.46 SD) and HAL -0.30D (±0.30); 2-year changes for DIMS were -0.50D (±0.64 SD) and HAL -0.63D (±0.56). Mean 1-year AL increases for DIMS were 0.19 mm (±0.56) and HAL 0.15 mm (±0.47); 2-year increases for DIMS were 0.29 mm (±0.63) and HAL 0.32 mm (±0.72). For equivalence margins of 0.25D and 0.50D for SER at 1 and 2 years, respectively, and similarly 0.20 mm and 0.30 mm margins for AL, DIMS and HAL lenses were equivalent apart from AL at 1 year where the 0.21 mm 95% CI upper limit just exceeded 0.20 mm. At both 1 and 2 years, none of the differences in mean SERs or ALs between DIMS and HAL were clinically or statistically significant (p≥0.05 Mann-Whitney U test). Using linear mixed model analysis, the interaction between lens type and time did not significantly affect SER or AL at 1- or 2-year follow-up (p≥0.05). 38.4% of children/adolescents with DIMS had no SER progression at 2 years, compared with 21.9% with HAL (p=0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a European population, DIMS and HAL lenses are essentially equivalent in their ability to reduce myopia progression and AL elongation over a 2-year follow-up period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749801/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003187\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较两种控制近视的镜片设计,离焦合并多段(DIMS)和高度非球面镜片(HAL),在减缓欧洲儿童/青少年近视进展方面的性能。先前直接比较这些设计的研究仅限于中国参与者和1年的随访。欧洲儿童/青少年的近视患病率估计为22.60%。方法:回顾性队列研究近视进展个体(6-17岁)。参与者佩戴DIMS (Hoya MiyoSmart)或HAL (Essilor Stellest)眼镜至少2年。在基线和1年和2年测量轴长(AL)和睫状体麻痹自折射(球等效折射(SER))。结果:DIMS患者1年平均SER变化为-0.34D(±0.46 SD), HAL为-0.30D(±0.30);2年DIMS变化为-0.50D(±0.64 SD), HAL变化为-0.63 3d(±0.56)。DIMS患者1年平均AL升高0.19 mm(±0.56),HAL患者平均AL升高0.15 mm(±0.47);2年DIMS增加0.29 mm(±0.63),HAL增加0.32 mm(±0.72)。对于1年和2年SER的等效边缘分别为0.25D和0.50D, AL的等效边缘同样为0.20 mm和0.30 mm,除了AL, DIMS和HAL透镜在1年的等效边缘是相等的,其中0.21 mm 95% CI上限刚刚超过0.20 mm。在1年和2年,DIMS和HAL的平均SERs或ALs均无临床或统计学差异(p≥0.05 Mann-Whitney U检验)。采用线性混合模型分析,1年或2年随访时,晶状体类型和时间的相互作用对SER或AL无显著影响(p≥0.05)。38.4%患有DIMS的儿童/青少年在2年时没有SER进展,而患有HAL的儿童/青少年为21.9% (p=0.047)。结论:在欧洲人群中,在2年的随访期内,DIMS和HAL镜片在减少近视进展和AL伸长方面的能力基本相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the performance of myopia control in European children and adolescents with defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) and highly aspherical lenslets (HAL) spectacles.

Purpose: A performance comparison of two myopia control spectacle lens designs, defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) and highly aspherical lenslets (HAL), at slowing myopia progression in a European child/adolescent population. Previous research directly comparing these designs has been limited to Chinese participants and 1-year follow-up. The prevalence of myopia in European child/adolescent has been estimated at 22.60%.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of individuals (6-17 years) with myopia progression. Participants wore DIMS (Hoya MiyoSmart) or HAL (Essilor Stellest) spectacles for a minimum of 2 years. Axial length (AL) and cycloplegic autorefraction (spherical equivalent refraction (SER)) were measured at baseline and 1 and 2 years.

Results: Mean 1-year SER changes for DIMS were -0.34D (±0.46 SD) and HAL -0.30D (±0.30); 2-year changes for DIMS were -0.50D (±0.64 SD) and HAL -0.63D (±0.56). Mean 1-year AL increases for DIMS were 0.19 mm (±0.56) and HAL 0.15 mm (±0.47); 2-year increases for DIMS were 0.29 mm (±0.63) and HAL 0.32 mm (±0.72). For equivalence margins of 0.25D and 0.50D for SER at 1 and 2 years, respectively, and similarly 0.20 mm and 0.30 mm margins for AL, DIMS and HAL lenses were equivalent apart from AL at 1 year where the 0.21 mm 95% CI upper limit just exceeded 0.20 mm. At both 1 and 2 years, none of the differences in mean SERs or ALs between DIMS and HAL were clinically or statistically significant (p≥0.05 Mann-Whitney U test). Using linear mixed model analysis, the interaction between lens type and time did not significantly affect SER or AL at 1- or 2-year follow-up (p≥0.05). 38.4% of children/adolescents with DIMS had no SER progression at 2 years, compared with 21.9% with HAL (p=0.047).

Conclusion: In a European population, DIMS and HAL lenses are essentially equivalent in their ability to reduce myopia progression and AL elongation over a 2-year follow-up period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
期刊最新文献
Neonatal unit admission and offspring mental health trajectories across childhood and adolescence: a nationally representative UK cohort study. Randomised feasibility study of an intestinal adsorbent in acute diarrhoea in The Gambia. Exceeding the limits of paediatric heat stress tolerance: the risk of losing a generation to climate inaction. Neurodevelopmental outcomes after infant heart surgery for congenital heart disease: a hospital-based multicentre prospective cohort study from India. Feasibility of engaging parents attending an adult weight management programme with child weight management support: a mixed methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1