单侧双门静脉内窥镜(UBE)脊柱手术的学习曲线洞察:熟练程度临界值及其对效率和并发症的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08632-9
Jing Peng, Rongzhen Lin, Duopei Fang, Zhaojun He, Qinghao Zhao, Qingchu Li
{"title":"单侧双门静脉内窥镜(UBE)脊柱手术的学习曲线洞察:熟练程度临界值及其对效率和并发症的影响。","authors":"Jing Peng, Rongzhen Lin, Duopei Fang, Zhaojun He, Qinghao Zhao, Qingchu Li","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08632-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study systematically assesses the learning curve of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) techniques across various spinal surgeries, focusing on its influence on operative efficiency and complication rates to guide optimized training and practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library identified studies on UBE learning curves for patients aged 18 or older, comparing early and mastery phases. Two reviewers independently extracted data on surgery type, operative time, and complications. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We performed subgroup analyses based on different UBE surgery types, examining variations in operative time and complication rates across each procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies, including 1217 patients, were included, focusing on lumbar spine surgeries. The average learning curve cutoff for UBE procedures was 32.18 cases, with the mastery phase reducing operative time by an average of 48.14 min (95% CI 35.80, 60.47; p < 0.001), although high heterogeneity observed. In the mastery phase, single-group analysis of 707 patients showed a mean operative time of 92.38 min (95% CI 77.35, 107.41). Complication analysis across 12 studies (1182 patients) revealed a significantly lower rate in the mastery phase (odds ratio, OR = 0.29; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed significant reductions in both operative time and complications for UBE-LIF and UBE-LD/ULBD during the mastery phase, while no significant changes were observed for UBE-PCF. Additionally, specific complications, such as dural tears and incomplete decompression, were significantly reduced in the mastery phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review confirms a learning curve in UBE surgery, with improvements in operative time and complications. Procedure-specific cutoff points provide guidance for training and future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning curve insights in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) spinal procedures: proficiency cutoffs and the impact on efficiency and complications.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Peng, Rongzhen Lin, Duopei Fang, Zhaojun He, Qinghao Zhao, Qingchu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-024-08632-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study systematically assesses the learning curve of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) techniques across various spinal surgeries, focusing on its influence on operative efficiency and complication rates to guide optimized training and practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library identified studies on UBE learning curves for patients aged 18 or older, comparing early and mastery phases. Two reviewers independently extracted data on surgery type, operative time, and complications. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We performed subgroup analyses based on different UBE surgery types, examining variations in operative time and complication rates across each procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies, including 1217 patients, were included, focusing on lumbar spine surgeries. The average learning curve cutoff for UBE procedures was 32.18 cases, with the mastery phase reducing operative time by an average of 48.14 min (95% CI 35.80, 60.47; p < 0.001), although high heterogeneity observed. In the mastery phase, single-group analysis of 707 patients showed a mean operative time of 92.38 min (95% CI 77.35, 107.41). Complication analysis across 12 studies (1182 patients) revealed a significantly lower rate in the mastery phase (odds ratio, OR = 0.29; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed significant reductions in both operative time and complications for UBE-LIF and UBE-LD/ULBD during the mastery phase, while no significant changes were observed for UBE-PCF. Additionally, specific complications, such as dural tears and incomplete decompression, were significantly reduced in the mastery phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review confirms a learning curve in UBE surgery, with improvements in operative time and complications. Procedure-specific cutoff points provide guidance for training and future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08632-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08632-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:系统评估单侧双门静脉内镜(UBE)技术在不同脊柱手术中的学习曲线,重点研究其对手术效率和并发症发生率的影响,以指导优化培训和实践。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆,确定18岁及以上患者的UBE学习曲线,比较早期和掌握阶段。两位评论者独立提取了手术类型、手术时间和并发症的数据。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。我们根据不同的UBE手术类型进行了亚组分析,检查了每次手术中手术时间和并发症发生率的变化。结果:纳入13项研究,包括1217例患者,重点是腰椎手术。UBE手术的平均学习曲线截止时间为32.18例,掌握阶段平均缩短手术时间48.14 min (95% CI 35.80, 60.47;结论:本系统综述证实了UBE手术的学习曲线,手术时间和并发症有所改善。程序特定的分界点为培训和未来的研究提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning curve insights in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) spinal procedures: proficiency cutoffs and the impact on efficiency and complications.

Objective: This study systematically assesses the learning curve of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) techniques across various spinal surgeries, focusing on its influence on operative efficiency and complication rates to guide optimized training and practice.

Methods: Systematic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library identified studies on UBE learning curves for patients aged 18 or older, comparing early and mastery phases. Two reviewers independently extracted data on surgery type, operative time, and complications. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We performed subgroup analyses based on different UBE surgery types, examining variations in operative time and complication rates across each procedure.

Results: Thirteen studies, including 1217 patients, were included, focusing on lumbar spine surgeries. The average learning curve cutoff for UBE procedures was 32.18 cases, with the mastery phase reducing operative time by an average of 48.14 min (95% CI 35.80, 60.47; p < 0.001), although high heterogeneity observed. In the mastery phase, single-group analysis of 707 patients showed a mean operative time of 92.38 min (95% CI 77.35, 107.41). Complication analysis across 12 studies (1182 patients) revealed a significantly lower rate in the mastery phase (odds ratio, OR = 0.29; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed significant reductions in both operative time and complications for UBE-LIF and UBE-LD/ULBD during the mastery phase, while no significant changes were observed for UBE-PCF. Additionally, specific complications, such as dural tears and incomplete decompression, were significantly reduced in the mastery phase.

Conclusion: This systematic review confirms a learning curve in UBE surgery, with improvements in operative time and complications. Procedure-specific cutoff points provide guidance for training and future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Correction: Deep learning model for automated detection of fresh and old vertebral fractures on thoracolumbar CT. Announcements. Sleep characteristics and intervertebral disc degeneration risk: an observational and Mendelian randomization study. Age-threshold for increased risk of developing back disorders: prospective cohort with 74 000 individuals from the UK Biobank. Effect and safety of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation: direct inferior endplate approach versus indirect approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1