慢性肝病是ercp后并发症的危险因素:一项全国性的回顾性分析

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000002131
Madhav Changela, Janak Bahirwani, Ernestine Faye Tan, Nishit Patel, Sanket Basida, Maulik Kaneriya, Amanda Singh, Deep Mehta, Kaushalkumar Suthar, Rodrigo Duarte-Chavez
{"title":"慢性肝病是ercp后并发症的危险因素:一项全国性的回顾性分析","authors":"Madhav Changela, Janak Bahirwani, Ernestine Faye Tan, Nishit Patel, Sanket Basida, Maulik Kaneriya, Amanda Singh, Deep Mehta, Kaushalkumar Suthar, Rodrigo Duarte-Chavez","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is indicated for multiple pancreatic and biliary pathologies and carries a heightened risk profile compared with other endoscopic procedures. Considerable research has been directed towards discerning risk factors associated with complications such as post-ERCP pancreatitis and post-ERCP bleeding. Despite this, data on chronic liver disease (CLD) as a risk factor for complications is limited. We aimed to assess the outcomes of patients with CLD who underwent therapeutic or diagnostic ERCP to determine whether these patients had different outcomes relative to patients without CLD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to inquire for all adult patients who underwent ERCP between 2016 and 2019 using the International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) coding. The group was stratified into 2 groups: patients with CLD and those without. The main outcome we looked at was the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis, post-ERCP hemorrhage, and perforation between the 2 groups. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and length of stay. A multivariate regression model was used to estimate the association of CLD with ERCP outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 883,825 patients who underwent ERCP between 2016 and 2019. Among these, 21,212 (2.4%) had CLD and 862,613 (97.6%) did not have CLD. The mean age for patients in liver disease group was 61.66 years and in group without liver disease was 60.46 years. The predominant ethnicity in both groups was whites. Additional admission-related factors are outlined in Table 1. The rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (8.8% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.001) with adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.3; and post-ERCP hemorrhage (8.8% vs. 6.69%, P < 0.001) with aOR 1.35, was higher in the patient group with CLD. The rate of post-procedure perforation was not significantly different in both groups. For secondary outcomes; the in-hospital mortality (3.03% vs. 1.58%, P < 0.001) and length of stay (7 days vs. 3 days, P < 0.001) were higher in the patients with chronic liver disease. The outcomes are mentioned in Table 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although ERCP is considered a safe procedure, it is one of the endoscopic procedures associated with the highest risk of complications. As a result, risk stratification is crucial. Certain demographics, conditions like end-stage renal disease, liver cirrhosis, and procedural factors have been identified as risk factors for post-ERCP complications. Our study represents newer data, with use of revised ICD codes, to demonstrate increased risk in patients with liver disease. On the basis of these results, ERCP should be used judiciously in this population and further studies are required for identifying reversible risk factors to improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic Liver Disease as a Risk Factor For Post-ERCP Complications: A Nationwide Retrospective Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Madhav Changela, Janak Bahirwani, Ernestine Faye Tan, Nishit Patel, Sanket Basida, Maulik Kaneriya, Amanda Singh, Deep Mehta, Kaushalkumar Suthar, Rodrigo Duarte-Chavez\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is indicated for multiple pancreatic and biliary pathologies and carries a heightened risk profile compared with other endoscopic procedures. Considerable research has been directed towards discerning risk factors associated with complications such as post-ERCP pancreatitis and post-ERCP bleeding. Despite this, data on chronic liver disease (CLD) as a risk factor for complications is limited. We aimed to assess the outcomes of patients with CLD who underwent therapeutic or diagnostic ERCP to determine whether these patients had different outcomes relative to patients without CLD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to inquire for all adult patients who underwent ERCP between 2016 and 2019 using the International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) coding. The group was stratified into 2 groups: patients with CLD and those without. The main outcome we looked at was the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis, post-ERCP hemorrhage, and perforation between the 2 groups. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and length of stay. A multivariate regression model was used to estimate the association of CLD with ERCP outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 883,825 patients who underwent ERCP between 2016 and 2019. Among these, 21,212 (2.4%) had CLD and 862,613 (97.6%) did not have CLD. The mean age for patients in liver disease group was 61.66 years and in group without liver disease was 60.46 years. The predominant ethnicity in both groups was whites. Additional admission-related factors are outlined in Table 1. The rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (8.8% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.001) with adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.3; and post-ERCP hemorrhage (8.8% vs. 6.69%, P < 0.001) with aOR 1.35, was higher in the patient group with CLD. The rate of post-procedure perforation was not significantly different in both groups. For secondary outcomes; the in-hospital mortality (3.03% vs. 1.58%, P < 0.001) and length of stay (7 days vs. 3 days, P < 0.001) were higher in the patients with chronic liver disease. The outcomes are mentioned in Table 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although ERCP is considered a safe procedure, it is one of the endoscopic procedures associated with the highest risk of complications. As a result, risk stratification is crucial. Certain demographics, conditions like end-stage renal disease, liver cirrhosis, and procedural factors have been identified as risk factors for post-ERCP complications. Our study represents newer data, with use of revised ICD codes, to demonstrate increased risk in patients with liver disease. On the basis of these results, ERCP should be used judiciously in this population and further studies are required for identifying reversible risk factors to improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002131\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内窥镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)适用于多种胰腺和胆道病变,与其他内窥镜手术相比,具有更高的风险。相当多的研究已被用于识别与ercp后胰腺炎和ercp后出血等并发症相关的危险因素。尽管如此,慢性肝病(CLD)作为并发症危险因素的数据有限。我们的目的是评估接受治疗性或诊断性ERCP的CLD患者的结局,以确定这些患者的结局是否与没有CLD的患者不同。方法:我们使用国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库,使用国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)编码查询2016年至2019年期间接受ERCP的所有成年患者。分组分为两组:CLD患者和无CLD患者。我们观察的主要结果是两组之间ercp后胰腺炎、ercp后出血和穿孔的发生率。次要结局是住院死亡率和住院时间。采用多元回归模型估计CLD与ERCP结果的关系。结果:我们在2016年至2019年期间共确定了883,825例接受ERCP的患者。其中,21212例(2.4%)患有CLD, 862613例(97.6%)未患CLD。肝病组患者平均年龄为61.66岁,无肝病组患者平均年龄为60.46岁。两组中的主要种族都是白人。表1列出了其他与入院相关的因素。ercp后胰腺炎发生率(8.8% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.001),校正优势比(aOR) 1.3;ercp后出血(8.8% vs. 6.69%, P < 0.001), aOR为1.35,CLD患者组较高。两组术后穿孔发生率无显著性差异。次要结局;慢性肝病患者的住院死亡率(3.03%比1.58%,P < 0.001)和住院时间(7天比3天,P < 0.001)高于慢性肝病患者。结果如表2所示。结论:虽然ERCP被认为是安全的手术,但它是并发症风险最高的内镜手术之一。因此,风险分层至关重要。某些人口统计学特征、终末期肾病、肝硬化和程序性因素已被确定为ercp后并发症的危险因素。我们的研究代表了更新的数据,使用修订的ICD代码,证明肝病患者的风险增加。基于这些结果,ERCP在这一人群中应谨慎使用,并需要进一步的研究来确定可逆的危险因素以改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chronic Liver Disease as a Risk Factor For Post-ERCP Complications: A Nationwide Retrospective Analysis.

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is indicated for multiple pancreatic and biliary pathologies and carries a heightened risk profile compared with other endoscopic procedures. Considerable research has been directed towards discerning risk factors associated with complications such as post-ERCP pancreatitis and post-ERCP bleeding. Despite this, data on chronic liver disease (CLD) as a risk factor for complications is limited. We aimed to assess the outcomes of patients with CLD who underwent therapeutic or diagnostic ERCP to determine whether these patients had different outcomes relative to patients without CLD.

Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to inquire for all adult patients who underwent ERCP between 2016 and 2019 using the International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) coding. The group was stratified into 2 groups: patients with CLD and those without. The main outcome we looked at was the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis, post-ERCP hemorrhage, and perforation between the 2 groups. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and length of stay. A multivariate regression model was used to estimate the association of CLD with ERCP outcomes.

Results: We identified a total of 883,825 patients who underwent ERCP between 2016 and 2019. Among these, 21,212 (2.4%) had CLD and 862,613 (97.6%) did not have CLD. The mean age for patients in liver disease group was 61.66 years and in group without liver disease was 60.46 years. The predominant ethnicity in both groups was whites. Additional admission-related factors are outlined in Table 1. The rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (8.8% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.001) with adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.3; and post-ERCP hemorrhage (8.8% vs. 6.69%, P < 0.001) with aOR 1.35, was higher in the patient group with CLD. The rate of post-procedure perforation was not significantly different in both groups. For secondary outcomes; the in-hospital mortality (3.03% vs. 1.58%, P < 0.001) and length of stay (7 days vs. 3 days, P < 0.001) were higher in the patients with chronic liver disease. The outcomes are mentioned in Table 2.

Conclusion: Although ERCP is considered a safe procedure, it is one of the endoscopic procedures associated with the highest risk of complications. As a result, risk stratification is crucial. Certain demographics, conditions like end-stage renal disease, liver cirrhosis, and procedural factors have been identified as risk factors for post-ERCP complications. Our study represents newer data, with use of revised ICD codes, to demonstrate increased risk in patients with liver disease. On the basis of these results, ERCP should be used judiciously in this population and further studies are required for identifying reversible risk factors to improve outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Different Types of Physical Activity and Hepatic Steatosis and Liver Fibrosis: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on NHANES. Efficacy of Endoscopic Therapy in Symptomatic Pancreatic Divisum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Outcomes of ERCP in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis: A Nationwide Inpatient Assessment. Satisfaction With and Adherence to Off-Label Corticosteroids in Adolescents and Adults With Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Results of a Web-Based Survey in the United States. Do Patients With NASH-related Cirrhosis Have Better Overall Survival Compared With Other Etiologies of Cirrhosis? A Population-based Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1