分娩球练习减少分娩疼痛和剖宫产率的疗效:一项随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07930-3
Marcela Tatsch Terres, Marcus Vinicius de Carvalho Souza, Lucas Manoel Oliveira Costa, Laiz Novaes, Marina Ferreira de Avila, Serafim Garcia Barros, Henrique Provinciatto, Anna Paula Piovezan
{"title":"分娩球练习减少分娩疼痛和剖宫产率的疗效:一项随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析。","authors":"Marcela Tatsch Terres, Marcus Vinicius de Carvalho Souza, Lucas Manoel Oliveira Costa, Laiz Novaes, Marina Ferreira de Avila, Serafim Garcia Barros, Henrique Provinciatto, Anna Paula Piovezan","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07930-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of a birthing ball (BB) exercises on low-risk parturients during labor, offering a more comprehensive understanding through a larger sample size, robust analysis, and focus on relevant endpoints that were underexplored in previous studies due to limited data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BB (also named Swiss ball) exercises with no intervention or standard care in parturients undergoing low-risk labor. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using a random-effects model. I<sup>2</sup> heterogeneity was assessed. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 10 RCTs with 1,008 parturients, 51.2% of whom were assigned to BB exercises. In the pooled analysis, the BB group showed significantly lower cesarean section rates (MD 0.55, p = 0.007, I<sup>2</sup> = 32%), reduced pain scores at 4 and 8 cm dilation by approximately 20% (p < 0.001), and a reduction of over two hours in the duration of the first stage of labor (MD -130.12 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in the duration of the second stage of labor (p = 0.090) and in the incidence of instrumental delivery, amniotomy, labor induction, oxytocin use, or epidural analgesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BB exercises significantly reduced cesarean section rates, alleviated labor pain, and shortened the first stage of labor, supporting their use as a safe and effective non-pharmacological intervention in low-risk labor management.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of birthing ball exercises to reduce labor pain and cesarean rates: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Marcela Tatsch Terres, Marcus Vinicius de Carvalho Souza, Lucas Manoel Oliveira Costa, Laiz Novaes, Marina Ferreira de Avila, Serafim Garcia Barros, Henrique Provinciatto, Anna Paula Piovezan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07930-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of a birthing ball (BB) exercises on low-risk parturients during labor, offering a more comprehensive understanding through a larger sample size, robust analysis, and focus on relevant endpoints that were underexplored in previous studies due to limited data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BB (also named Swiss ball) exercises with no intervention or standard care in parturients undergoing low-risk labor. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using a random-effects model. I<sup>2</sup> heterogeneity was assessed. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 10 RCTs with 1,008 parturients, 51.2% of whom were assigned to BB exercises. In the pooled analysis, the BB group showed significantly lower cesarean section rates (MD 0.55, p = 0.007, I<sup>2</sup> = 32%), reduced pain scores at 4 and 8 cm dilation by approximately 20% (p < 0.001), and a reduction of over two hours in the duration of the first stage of labor (MD -130.12 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in the duration of the second stage of labor (p = 0.090) and in the incidence of instrumental delivery, amniotomy, labor induction, oxytocin use, or epidural analgesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BB exercises significantly reduced cesarean section rates, alleviated labor pain, and shortened the first stage of labor, supporting their use as a safe and effective non-pharmacological intervention in low-risk labor management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07930-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07930-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本更新的系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估分娩球(BB)练习对分娩过程中低风险产妇的影响,通过更大的样本量,稳健的分析,并关注先前研究中由于数据有限而未充分探索的相关终点,提供更全面的了解。方法:我们检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane Central,寻找比较BB(也称为瑞士球)运动与无干预或标准护理的低风险分娩产妇的随机对照试验(rct)。采用随机效应模型计算风险比(RR)和平均差异(MD)。评估I2异质性。所有统计分析均使用Review Manager 5.4进行。结果:我们纳入了10项随机对照试验,共1008名产妇,其中51.2%的人被分配到BB练习。在综合分析中,BB组剖宫产率显著降低(MD = 0.55, p = 0.007, I2 = 32%), 4 cm和8 cm扩张时疼痛评分降低约20% (p结论:BB运动显著降低剖宫产率,减轻分娩疼痛,缩短第一产程,支持其作为一种安全有效的低风险分娩管理非药物干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of birthing ball exercises to reduce labor pain and cesarean rates: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Purpose: This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of a birthing ball (BB) exercises on low-risk parturients during labor, offering a more comprehensive understanding through a larger sample size, robust analysis, and focus on relevant endpoints that were underexplored in previous studies due to limited data.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BB (also named Swiss ball) exercises with no intervention or standard care in parturients undergoing low-risk labor. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using a random-effects model. I2 heterogeneity was assessed. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.

Results: We included 10 RCTs with 1,008 parturients, 51.2% of whom were assigned to BB exercises. In the pooled analysis, the BB group showed significantly lower cesarean section rates (MD 0.55, p = 0.007, I2 = 32%), reduced pain scores at 4 and 8 cm dilation by approximately 20% (p < 0.001), and a reduction of over two hours in the duration of the first stage of labor (MD -130.12 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in the duration of the second stage of labor (p = 0.090) and in the incidence of instrumental delivery, amniotomy, labor induction, oxytocin use, or epidural analgesia.

Conclusions: BB exercises significantly reduced cesarean section rates, alleviated labor pain, and shortened the first stage of labor, supporting their use as a safe and effective non-pharmacological intervention in low-risk labor management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
期刊最新文献
The outcome of early perineal rehabilitation in obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a single-center experience. Comparison of complications and surgery outcomes in skin closure methods following cesarean sections. Impact of a new image enhancement technology on the nuchal translucency thickness. The effect of intrapartum deinfibulation on obstetric outcomes and postpartum sexual function in pregnant women with Type 3 Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. Unmet clinical needs in women with polycystic ovary syndrome regarding fertility and obesity: a cross-sectional study from the patient's perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1