Marcela Tatsch Terres, Marcus Vinicius de Carvalho Souza, Lucas Manoel Oliveira Costa, Laiz Novaes, Marina Ferreira de Avila, Serafim Garcia Barros, Henrique Provinciatto, Anna Paula Piovezan
{"title":"分娩球练习减少分娩疼痛和剖宫产率的疗效:一项随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析。","authors":"Marcela Tatsch Terres, Marcus Vinicius de Carvalho Souza, Lucas Manoel Oliveira Costa, Laiz Novaes, Marina Ferreira de Avila, Serafim Garcia Barros, Henrique Provinciatto, Anna Paula Piovezan","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07930-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of a birthing ball (BB) exercises on low-risk parturients during labor, offering a more comprehensive understanding through a larger sample size, robust analysis, and focus on relevant endpoints that were underexplored in previous studies due to limited data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BB (also named Swiss ball) exercises with no intervention or standard care in parturients undergoing low-risk labor. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using a random-effects model. I<sup>2</sup> heterogeneity was assessed. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 10 RCTs with 1,008 parturients, 51.2% of whom were assigned to BB exercises. In the pooled analysis, the BB group showed significantly lower cesarean section rates (MD 0.55, p = 0.007, I<sup>2</sup> = 32%), reduced pain scores at 4 and 8 cm dilation by approximately 20% (p < 0.001), and a reduction of over two hours in the duration of the first stage of labor (MD -130.12 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in the duration of the second stage of labor (p = 0.090) and in the incidence of instrumental delivery, amniotomy, labor induction, oxytocin use, or epidural analgesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BB exercises significantly reduced cesarean section rates, alleviated labor pain, and shortened the first stage of labor, supporting their use as a safe and effective non-pharmacological intervention in low-risk labor management.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of birthing ball exercises to reduce labor pain and cesarean rates: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Marcela Tatsch Terres, Marcus Vinicius de Carvalho Souza, Lucas Manoel Oliveira Costa, Laiz Novaes, Marina Ferreira de Avila, Serafim Garcia Barros, Henrique Provinciatto, Anna Paula Piovezan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07930-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of a birthing ball (BB) exercises on low-risk parturients during labor, offering a more comprehensive understanding through a larger sample size, robust analysis, and focus on relevant endpoints that were underexplored in previous studies due to limited data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BB (also named Swiss ball) exercises with no intervention or standard care in parturients undergoing low-risk labor. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using a random-effects model. I<sup>2</sup> heterogeneity was assessed. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 10 RCTs with 1,008 parturients, 51.2% of whom were assigned to BB exercises. In the pooled analysis, the BB group showed significantly lower cesarean section rates (MD 0.55, p = 0.007, I<sup>2</sup> = 32%), reduced pain scores at 4 and 8 cm dilation by approximately 20% (p < 0.001), and a reduction of over two hours in the duration of the first stage of labor (MD -130.12 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in the duration of the second stage of labor (p = 0.090) and in the incidence of instrumental delivery, amniotomy, labor induction, oxytocin use, or epidural analgesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BB exercises significantly reduced cesarean section rates, alleviated labor pain, and shortened the first stage of labor, supporting their use as a safe and effective non-pharmacological intervention in low-risk labor management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07930-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07930-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of birthing ball exercises to reduce labor pain and cesarean rates: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Purpose: This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of a birthing ball (BB) exercises on low-risk parturients during labor, offering a more comprehensive understanding through a larger sample size, robust analysis, and focus on relevant endpoints that were underexplored in previous studies due to limited data.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BB (also named Swiss ball) exercises with no intervention or standard care in parturients undergoing low-risk labor. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using a random-effects model. I2 heterogeneity was assessed. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.
Results: We included 10 RCTs with 1,008 parturients, 51.2% of whom were assigned to BB exercises. In the pooled analysis, the BB group showed significantly lower cesarean section rates (MD 0.55, p = 0.007, I2 = 32%), reduced pain scores at 4 and 8 cm dilation by approximately 20% (p < 0.001), and a reduction of over two hours in the duration of the first stage of labor (MD -130.12 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in the duration of the second stage of labor (p = 0.090) and in the incidence of instrumental delivery, amniotomy, labor induction, oxytocin use, or epidural analgesia.
Conclusions: BB exercises significantly reduced cesarean section rates, alleviated labor pain, and shortened the first stage of labor, supporting their use as a safe and effective non-pharmacological intervention in low-risk labor management.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report".
The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.