低损耗EELS地图的应用噪声模型。

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 MICROSCOPY Ultramicroscopy Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ultramic.2024.114101
Christian Zietlow, Jörg K N Lindner
{"title":"低损耗EELS地图的应用噪声模型。","authors":"Christian Zietlow, Jörg K N Lindner","doi":"10.1016/j.ultramic.2024.114101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) performed in a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) is susceptible to noise, just like every other measurement. EELS measurements are also affected by signal blurring, related to the energy distribution of the electron beam and the detector point spread function (PSF). Moreover, the signal blurring caused by the detector introduces correlation effects, which smooth the noise. A general understanding of the noise is essential for evaluating the quality of measurements or for designing more effective post-processing techniques such as deconvolution, which especially in the context of EELS is a common practice to enhance signals. Therefore, we offer theoretical insight into the noise smoothing by convolution and characterize the resulting noise correlations by Pearson coefficients. Additional effects play a role in EELS mapping, where multiple spectra are acquired sequentially at various specimen positions. These three-dimensional datasets are affected by energy drifts of the electron beam, causing spectra to shift relative to each other, and by beam current deviations, which alter their relative proportion. We investigate several energy alignment techniques to correct energy drifts on a sub-channel level and describe the intensity normalization necessary to correct for beam current deviations. Both procedures affect noises and uncertainties of the measurement to various degrees. In this paper, we mathematically derive an applied noise model for EELS measurements, which is straightforward to use. Therefore, we provide the necessary methods to determine the most important noise parameters of the EELS detector enabling users to adapt the model. In summary, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the noises faced in EELS and offer the necessary tools to apply this knowledge in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23439,"journal":{"name":"Ultramicroscopy","volume":"270 ","pages":"114101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An applied noise model for low-loss EELS maps.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Zietlow, Jörg K N Lindner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultramic.2024.114101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) performed in a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) is susceptible to noise, just like every other measurement. EELS measurements are also affected by signal blurring, related to the energy distribution of the electron beam and the detector point spread function (PSF). Moreover, the signal blurring caused by the detector introduces correlation effects, which smooth the noise. A general understanding of the noise is essential for evaluating the quality of measurements or for designing more effective post-processing techniques such as deconvolution, which especially in the context of EELS is a common practice to enhance signals. Therefore, we offer theoretical insight into the noise smoothing by convolution and characterize the resulting noise correlations by Pearson coefficients. Additional effects play a role in EELS mapping, where multiple spectra are acquired sequentially at various specimen positions. These three-dimensional datasets are affected by energy drifts of the electron beam, causing spectra to shift relative to each other, and by beam current deviations, which alter their relative proportion. We investigate several energy alignment techniques to correct energy drifts on a sub-channel level and describe the intensity normalization necessary to correct for beam current deviations. Both procedures affect noises and uncertainties of the measurement to various degrees. In this paper, we mathematically derive an applied noise model for EELS measurements, which is straightforward to use. Therefore, we provide the necessary methods to determine the most important noise parameters of the EELS detector enabling users to adapt the model. In summary, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the noises faced in EELS and offer the necessary tools to apply this knowledge in practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultramicroscopy\",\"volume\":\"270 \",\"pages\":\"114101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultramicroscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2024.114101\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROSCOPY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultramicroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2024.114101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在扫描透射电子显微镜(STEM)中进行的电子能量损失光谱(EELS)与其他测量一样容易受到噪声的影响。EELS测量也受到信号模糊的影响,这与电子束的能量分布和检波器点扩展函数(PSF)有关。此外,探测器引起的信号模糊引入了相关效应,从而平滑了噪声。对噪声的一般理解对于评估测量质量或设计更有效的后处理技术(如反褶积)至关重要,特别是在EELS的背景下,这是增强信号的常用做法。因此,我们提供了对卷积噪声平滑的理论见解,并通过皮尔逊系数表征了产生的噪声相关性。附加效应在EELS制图中发挥作用,在不同的样品位置依次获得多个光谱。这些三维数据集受到电子束能量漂移和电子束电流偏差的影响,电子束的能量漂移会导致光谱相对偏移,电子束电流偏差会改变它们的相对比例。我们研究了几种能量对准技术来纠正子通道水平上的能量漂移,并描述了纠正光束电流偏差所需的强度归一化。这两种方法对测量噪声和不确定度都有不同程度的影响。在本文中,我们从数学上推导了一个用于EELS测量的应用噪声模型,该模型易于使用。因此,我们提供了必要的方法来确定EELS检测器最重要的噪声参数,使用户能够适应模型。总之,我们的目标是提供对EELS中所面临的噪声的全面理解,并提供在实践中应用这些知识的必要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An applied noise model for low-loss EELS maps.

Electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) performed in a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) is susceptible to noise, just like every other measurement. EELS measurements are also affected by signal blurring, related to the energy distribution of the electron beam and the detector point spread function (PSF). Moreover, the signal blurring caused by the detector introduces correlation effects, which smooth the noise. A general understanding of the noise is essential for evaluating the quality of measurements or for designing more effective post-processing techniques such as deconvolution, which especially in the context of EELS is a common practice to enhance signals. Therefore, we offer theoretical insight into the noise smoothing by convolution and characterize the resulting noise correlations by Pearson coefficients. Additional effects play a role in EELS mapping, where multiple spectra are acquired sequentially at various specimen positions. These three-dimensional datasets are affected by energy drifts of the electron beam, causing spectra to shift relative to each other, and by beam current deviations, which alter their relative proportion. We investigate several energy alignment techniques to correct energy drifts on a sub-channel level and describe the intensity normalization necessary to correct for beam current deviations. Both procedures affect noises and uncertainties of the measurement to various degrees. In this paper, we mathematically derive an applied noise model for EELS measurements, which is straightforward to use. Therefore, we provide the necessary methods to determine the most important noise parameters of the EELS detector enabling users to adapt the model. In summary, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the noises faced in EELS and offer the necessary tools to apply this knowledge in practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ultramicroscopy
Ultramicroscopy 工程技术-显微镜技术
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Ultramicroscopy is an established journal that provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, invited reviews and rapid communications. The scope of Ultramicroscopy is to describe advances in instrumentation, methods and theory related to all modes of microscopical imaging, diffraction and spectroscopy in the life and physical sciences.
期刊最新文献
Aberration calculation of microlens array using differential algebraic method. Relativistic EELS scattering cross-sections for microanalysis based on Dirac solutions. Improved precision and accuracy of electron energy-loss spectroscopy quantification via fine structure fitting with constrained optimization. Workflow automation of SEM acquisitions and feature tracking. Enhancing subsurface imaging in ultrasonic atomic force microscopy with optimized contact force.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1