Philip Timmerman, Steve White, Neil Adcock, Cecilia Arfvidsson, Matthew Barfield, Kyra Cowan, Luca Ferrari, Michaela Golob, Lee Goodwin, Richard Hughes, Tsvetelina Ivanova, Anna Laurén, Stuart McDougall, Robert Nelson, Nico van de Merbel, Tom Verhaeghe, Michael Wright
{"title":"Feedback from a workshop by the European Bioanalysis Forum on assay validation requirements for <i>in vitro</i> assays following the publication of ICH M12 guideline - a plea for context-of-use over ICH M10 standards.","authors":"Philip Timmerman, Steve White, Neil Adcock, Cecilia Arfvidsson, Matthew Barfield, Kyra Cowan, Luca Ferrari, Michaela Golob, Lee Goodwin, Richard Hughes, Tsvetelina Ivanova, Anna Laurén, Stuart McDougall, Robert Nelson, Nico van de Merbel, Tom Verhaeghe, Michael Wright","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2025.2468596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The release of the ICH M12 Guideline on Drug Interaction Studies has reignited discussions around assay validation requirements for <i>in vitro</i> assays such as plasma protein-binding studies. Even though the ICH M12 does not directly reference the ICH M10 Guideline on Bioanalytical Method Validation and Sample Analysis, its release prompted further discussions on assay validation requirements for these studies during the 17th European Bioanalysis Forum Open Symposium held in Barcelona, Spain, from 19 to 21 November 2024, where we advocated for a Context-of-Use driven approach over rigid adherence to ICH M10 standards. Context-of-Use driven validation ensures assays are tailored to the specific scientific and regulatory needs, optimizing resource allocation and innovation in drug development. This short opinion paper explores the potential and undesired implications of ICH M12 on bioanalytical validation practices, highlights the distinction between exploratory assays and assays having a clinical impact, and underscores the necessity for tailored validation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2468596","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
ICH M12《药物相互作用研究指南》的发布再次引发了对血浆蛋白结合研究等体外检测的检测验证要求的讨论。尽管 ICH M12 并未直接参考《生物分析方法验证和样品分析 ICH M10 指南》,但它的发布还是在 2024 年 11 月 19-21 日于西班牙巴塞罗那举行的第 17 届欧洲生物分析论坛公开研讨会上引发了有关这些研究的检测验证要求的进一步讨论。以使用情境为导向的验证可确保测定符合特定的科学和监管需求,优化药物开发的资源分配和创新。这篇观点短文探讨了 ICH M12 对生物分析验证实践的潜在和不良影响,强调了探索性测定与具有临床影响的测定之间的区别,并强调了定制验证策略的必要性。
Feedback from a workshop by the European Bioanalysis Forum on assay validation requirements for in vitro assays following the publication of ICH M12 guideline - a plea for context-of-use over ICH M10 standards.
The release of the ICH M12 Guideline on Drug Interaction Studies has reignited discussions around assay validation requirements for in vitro assays such as plasma protein-binding studies. Even though the ICH M12 does not directly reference the ICH M10 Guideline on Bioanalytical Method Validation and Sample Analysis, its release prompted further discussions on assay validation requirements for these studies during the 17th European Bioanalysis Forum Open Symposium held in Barcelona, Spain, from 19 to 21 November 2024, where we advocated for a Context-of-Use driven approach over rigid adherence to ICH M10 standards. Context-of-Use driven validation ensures assays are tailored to the specific scientific and regulatory needs, optimizing resource allocation and innovation in drug development. This short opinion paper explores the potential and undesired implications of ICH M12 on bioanalytical validation practices, highlights the distinction between exploratory assays and assays having a clinical impact, and underscores the necessity for tailored validation strategies.
BioanalysisBIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍:
Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing.
The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality.
Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing.
The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques.
Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.