Stefano Zoroddu , Biagio Di Lorenzo , Panagiotis Paliogiannis , Arduino A. Mangoni , Ciriaco Carru , Angelo Zinellu
{"title":"Osteopontin in rheumatic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Stefano Zoroddu , Biagio Di Lorenzo , Panagiotis Paliogiannis , Arduino A. Mangoni , Ciriaco Carru , Angelo Zinellu","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2025.120209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Osteopontin (OPN), a glycoprotein involved in immune regulation and inflammation, is a potential candidate biomarker for rheumatic diseases (RDs). However, variability across studies limits its clinical utility. This <em>meta</em>-analysis evaluated OPN concentrations in RD patients compared to healthy controls and explored sources of heterogeneity. A systematic search identified 37 studies (43 comparator groups) including 3,201 RD patients and 2,543 controls. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated, and subgroup and <em>meta</em>-regression analyses examined the modulating role of demographic and clinical variables. Publication bias was assessed using Begg’s and Egger’s tests. OPN concentrations were significantly higher in RD patients than controls (SMD = 1.54, 95 % CI: 1.17–1.90, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed consistent elevations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, SMD = 0.97, I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA, SMD = 0.70, I<sup>2</sup> = 92.5 %), with osteoarthritis showing the largest effect size (SMD = 4.02). Age significantly moderated OPN concentrations (<em>p</em> = 0.030). Although publication bias was detected (<em>p</em> < 0.05), removing seven studies eliminated bias and maintained significant between-group differences (SMD = 0.78, 95 % CI: 0.62–0.93; <em>p</em> < 0.001). The high concentrations of OPN support its possible use as a candidate biomarker for RDs, particularly in SLE and RA. Resolution of heterogeneity and standardization may improve its clinical utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10205,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Chimica Acta","volume":"570 ","pages":"Article 120209"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898125000889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Osteopontin in rheumatic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Osteopontin (OPN), a glycoprotein involved in immune regulation and inflammation, is a potential candidate biomarker for rheumatic diseases (RDs). However, variability across studies limits its clinical utility. This meta-analysis evaluated OPN concentrations in RD patients compared to healthy controls and explored sources of heterogeneity. A systematic search identified 37 studies (43 comparator groups) including 3,201 RD patients and 2,543 controls. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated, and subgroup and meta-regression analyses examined the modulating role of demographic and clinical variables. Publication bias was assessed using Begg’s and Egger’s tests. OPN concentrations were significantly higher in RD patients than controls (SMD = 1.54, 95 % CI: 1.17–1.90, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed consistent elevations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, SMD = 0.97, I2 = 0 %) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA, SMD = 0.70, I2 = 92.5 %), with osteoarthritis showing the largest effect size (SMD = 4.02). Age significantly moderated OPN concentrations (p = 0.030). Although publication bias was detected (p < 0.05), removing seven studies eliminated bias and maintained significant between-group differences (SMD = 0.78, 95 % CI: 0.62–0.93; p < 0.001). The high concentrations of OPN support its possible use as a candidate biomarker for RDs, particularly in SLE and RA. Resolution of heterogeneity and standardization may improve its clinical utility.
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC)
Clinica Chimica Acta is a high-quality journal which publishes original Research Communications in the field of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, defined as the diagnostic application of chemistry, biochemistry, immunochemistry, biochemical aspects of hematology, toxicology, and molecular biology to the study of human disease in body fluids and cells.
The objective of the journal is to publish novel information leading to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of human diseases, their prevention, diagnosis, and patient management. Reports of an applied clinical character are also welcome. Papers concerned with normal metabolic processes or with constituents of normal cells or body fluids, such as reports of experimental or clinical studies in animals, are only considered when they are clearly and directly relevant to human disease. Evaluation of commercial products have a low priority for publication, unless they are novel or represent a technological breakthrough. Studies dealing with effects of drugs and natural products and studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not within the journal''s scope. Development and evaluation of novel analytical methodologies where applicable to diagnostic clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, including point-of-care testing, and topics on laboratory management and informatics will also be considered. Studies focused on emerging diagnostic technologies and (big) data analysis procedures including digitalization, mobile Health, and artificial Intelligence applied to Laboratory Medicine are also of interest.