中国有色水足迹不平等的新型评估框架

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113350
Xiaoling Li , Yu Song
{"title":"中国有色水足迹不平等的新型评估框架","authors":"Xiaoling Li ,&nbsp;Yu Song","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study establishes a novel model capable of diagnosing the inequality of China’s colored-water footprint (CWF) allocation through a multi-dimensional perspective for the years 2012, 2015, and 2017. The results indicate the following: (1) The grey water footprint (<em>WF<sub>grey</sub></em>) exceeds both the blue water footprint (<em>WF<sub>blue</sub></em>) and the green water footprint (<em>WF<sub>green</sub></em>). Provinces with higher CWF values are primarily located in the central, eastern, and southern geographical regions of China. (2) Provinces with substantial CWF outflow are primarily those with high GDP or extensive agricultural production, such as Jiangsu, Guangdong, Shandong, Henan, Zhejiang, and Sichuan. The sectors contributing most to net CWF outflows are agriculture and industry. (3) Although the Gini coefficients for CWF and socio-economic factors all remain below the warning threshold of 0.4, the Imbalance indices deviate significantly from the absolute balance line in most provinces, except for the WF<sub>green</sub>-population. Additionally, the Gini coefficient of water stress index (WSI) (0.608 ∼ 0.703) is substantially higher than that of CWF (0.000 ∼ 0.327). (4) The CWF Primacy Index for all provinces is significantly below the ideal level, indicating a polycentric spatial structure for CWF distribution across China. These findings offer valuable scientific insights for informing equitable CWF distribution strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 113350"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel assessment framework for colored-water footprint inequality in China\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoling Li ,&nbsp;Yu Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study establishes a novel model capable of diagnosing the inequality of China’s colored-water footprint (CWF) allocation through a multi-dimensional perspective for the years 2012, 2015, and 2017. The results indicate the following: (1) The grey water footprint (<em>WF<sub>grey</sub></em>) exceeds both the blue water footprint (<em>WF<sub>blue</sub></em>) and the green water footprint (<em>WF<sub>green</sub></em>). Provinces with higher CWF values are primarily located in the central, eastern, and southern geographical regions of China. (2) Provinces with substantial CWF outflow are primarily those with high GDP or extensive agricultural production, such as Jiangsu, Guangdong, Shandong, Henan, Zhejiang, and Sichuan. The sectors contributing most to net CWF outflows are agriculture and industry. (3) Although the Gini coefficients for CWF and socio-economic factors all remain below the warning threshold of 0.4, the Imbalance indices deviate significantly from the absolute balance line in most provinces, except for the WF<sub>green</sub>-population. Additionally, the Gini coefficient of water stress index (WSI) (0.608 ∼ 0.703) is substantially higher than that of CWF (0.000 ∼ 0.327). (4) The CWF Primacy Index for all provinces is significantly below the ideal level, indicating a polycentric spatial structure for CWF distribution across China. These findings offer valuable scientific insights for informing equitable CWF distribution strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2500281X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2500281X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过多维视角建立了中国有色水足迹(CWF)分配不平等的新模型,并对2012年、2015年和2017年进行了分析。结果表明:(1)灰水足迹(WFgrey)超过蓝水足迹(WFblue)和绿水足迹(WFgreen)。CWF值较高的省份主要分布在中国中部、东部和南部地理区域。(2) CWF大量流出的省份主要是国内生产总值高或农业生产粗放的省份,如江苏、广东、山东、河南、浙江和四川。对CWF净流出贡献最大的行业是农业和工业。(3)虽然CWF和社会经济因素的基尼系数均低于预警阈值0.4,但除wf -population外,大多数省份的不平衡指数均明显偏离绝对平衡线。此外,水分胁迫指数(WSI)的基尼系数(0.608 ~ 0.703)显著高于CWF(0.000 ~ 0.327)。④各省区CWF首位度指数均显著低于理想水平,表明中国CWF分布呈多中心空间结构。这些发现为制定公平的CWF分配策略提供了有价值的科学见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel assessment framework for colored-water footprint inequality in China
This study establishes a novel model capable of diagnosing the inequality of China’s colored-water footprint (CWF) allocation through a multi-dimensional perspective for the years 2012, 2015, and 2017. The results indicate the following: (1) The grey water footprint (WFgrey) exceeds both the blue water footprint (WFblue) and the green water footprint (WFgreen). Provinces with higher CWF values are primarily located in the central, eastern, and southern geographical regions of China. (2) Provinces with substantial CWF outflow are primarily those with high GDP or extensive agricultural production, such as Jiangsu, Guangdong, Shandong, Henan, Zhejiang, and Sichuan. The sectors contributing most to net CWF outflows are agriculture and industry. (3) Although the Gini coefficients for CWF and socio-economic factors all remain below the warning threshold of 0.4, the Imbalance indices deviate significantly from the absolute balance line in most provinces, except for the WFgreen-population. Additionally, the Gini coefficient of water stress index (WSI) (0.608 ∼ 0.703) is substantially higher than that of CWF (0.000 ∼ 0.327). (4) The CWF Primacy Index for all provinces is significantly below the ideal level, indicating a polycentric spatial structure for CWF distribution across China. These findings offer valuable scientific insights for informing equitable CWF distribution strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
Overstorey features provide stronger indicators of fine shrub fuel load than biophysical variables across tree species in northern Spain Dynamic assessment of dual droughts (SED-EED) in the East River basin under global change: A hybrid SWAT-SWSDI-copula framework based on coupled blue-green water analysis Rare bacteria with low absolute abundance as sensitive bioindicators of riverine pollution: A comparative study across river water, sediment, and riparian soils From plants to vertebrates: Vegetation-derived ecological indicator values reveal habitat drivers of a micro-endemic alpine salamander Evaluating multi-species indicators as tools for reserve-scale species distribution and abundance modelling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1