阿尔茨海默病的行为障碍:一种非药物治疗方法

A Silvestri, G Rosano, G Zannino, F Ricca, V Marigliano, M Fini
{"title":"阿尔茨海默病的行为障碍:一种非药物治疗方法","authors":"A Silvestri,&nbsp;G Rosano,&nbsp;G Zannino,&nbsp;F Ricca,&nbsp;V Marigliano,&nbsp;M Fini","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavioral disturbances in patients with dementia are among the primary causes of institutionalization. Although the majority of authors agree that such symptoms are well controlled with non-pharmacological support, almost all studies have been focused on symptomatic drug therapy (typical or atypical neuroleptics). The aim of our study was to evaluate the reduction of psychiatric symptoms revealed with the test called empirical behavioral pathology in Alzheimer disease (E-Behave-AD) in a population of patients with AD whose caregivers underwent training to learn various communication strategies to utilize with family members. We evaluated 35 patients with AD (18 males, 17 females, average age 76.5 +/- 5.9 years). Of these patients, 18 (9 males, 9 females, average age 75.1 +/- 6.5 years) were relatives of caregivers who underwent training for six months, four group meetings and two individual ones. During the training, caregivers learned about the possibility of communication with persons with AD. They were taught how to interact with the AD patients in various phases of the illness and how to utilize effectively both verbal and non-verbal language. Other 17 patients (9 males, 8 females, average age 76.1 +/- 4.9 years) were followed as a control group. During the period of observation, all patients were given rivastigmine or donezepil. The two groups were homogenous for age, sex, antipsychotic drug therapy, and initial scores on mini-mental state examination (MMSE), activity of daily living (ADL), instrumental activity of daily living (IADL), and E-Behave-AD. After six months, we evaluated the patients with an analogous battery of tests. The analysis of data proceeded from the verification of homogeneity of test subjects and of the control group with t-test for non-paired data. We used the chi2 statistics to compare the qualitative variables between test subjects and the control group. For all statistical tests, a p < 0.05 was considered significant. In the group of patients with caregivers who underwent training, a statistically significant decrease in the E-Behave-AD score (p < 0.001) was observed after six months (7.7 vs. 10.5; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant modification in the scores for the ADL, IADL, and MMSE (ADL 4.7 vs. 4.3, p = 0.09; IADL 3.2 vs. 3.1, p =0.4; MMSE 17.3 vs. 15.1, p = 0.1). Numerous evidences in literature underline the centrality of the language deficit in dementia, particularly in AD. A re-establishment, even if partial, of the channels of communication between AD patients and doctors, as well as between patients and caregivers, can reduce the frequency and intensity of behavioral disturbances in persons with AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":77833,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.048","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavioral disturbances in Alzheimer's disease: a non-pharmacological therapeutic approach.\",\"authors\":\"A Silvestri,&nbsp;G Rosano,&nbsp;G Zannino,&nbsp;F Ricca,&nbsp;V Marigliano,&nbsp;M Fini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Behavioral disturbances in patients with dementia are among the primary causes of institutionalization. Although the majority of authors agree that such symptoms are well controlled with non-pharmacological support, almost all studies have been focused on symptomatic drug therapy (typical or atypical neuroleptics). The aim of our study was to evaluate the reduction of psychiatric symptoms revealed with the test called empirical behavioral pathology in Alzheimer disease (E-Behave-AD) in a population of patients with AD whose caregivers underwent training to learn various communication strategies to utilize with family members. We evaluated 35 patients with AD (18 males, 17 females, average age 76.5 +/- 5.9 years). Of these patients, 18 (9 males, 9 females, average age 75.1 +/- 6.5 years) were relatives of caregivers who underwent training for six months, four group meetings and two individual ones. During the training, caregivers learned about the possibility of communication with persons with AD. They were taught how to interact with the AD patients in various phases of the illness and how to utilize effectively both verbal and non-verbal language. Other 17 patients (9 males, 8 females, average age 76.1 +/- 4.9 years) were followed as a control group. During the period of observation, all patients were given rivastigmine or donezepil. The two groups were homogenous for age, sex, antipsychotic drug therapy, and initial scores on mini-mental state examination (MMSE), activity of daily living (ADL), instrumental activity of daily living (IADL), and E-Behave-AD. After six months, we evaluated the patients with an analogous battery of tests. The analysis of data proceeded from the verification of homogeneity of test subjects and of the control group with t-test for non-paired data. We used the chi2 statistics to compare the qualitative variables between test subjects and the control group. For all statistical tests, a p < 0.05 was considered significant. In the group of patients with caregivers who underwent training, a statistically significant decrease in the E-Behave-AD score (p < 0.001) was observed after six months (7.7 vs. 10.5; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant modification in the scores for the ADL, IADL, and MMSE (ADL 4.7 vs. 4.3, p = 0.09; IADL 3.2 vs. 3.1, p =0.4; MMSE 17.3 vs. 15.1, p = 0.1). Numerous evidences in literature underline the centrality of the language deficit in dementia, particularly in AD. A re-establishment, even if partial, of the channels of communication between AD patients and doctors, as well as between patients and caregivers, can reduce the frequency and intensity of behavioral disturbances in persons with AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.048\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

痴呆患者的行为障碍是入院的主要原因之一。尽管大多数作者同意这些症状在非药物支持下得到很好的控制,但几乎所有的研究都集中在对症药物治疗上(典型或非典型抗精神病药)。我们研究的目的是评估阿尔茨海默病经验行为病理学(e- behavior -AD)测试显示的阿尔茨海默病患者的精神症状的减少,这些患者的护理人员接受了培训,学习了与家庭成员使用的各种沟通策略。我们评估了35例AD患者(男性18例,女性17例,平均年龄76.5±5.9岁)。在这些患者中,18例(男9例,女9例,平均年龄75.1±6.5岁)是护理者的亲属,他们接受了6个月的培训,4次小组会议和2次个人会议。在培训期间,护理人员了解了与AD患者沟通的可能性。他们被教导如何在疾病的各个阶段与阿尔茨海默病患者互动,以及如何有效地利用语言和非语言语言。其余17例患者(男9例,女8例,平均年龄76.1±4.9岁)作为对照组。观察期间,所有患者均给予利瓦斯汀或多奈哌。两组在年龄、性别、抗精神病药物治疗、最小精神状态检查(MMSE)、日常生活活动(ADL)、日常生活工具性活动(IADL)和e- behavior - ad的初始得分均相同。六个月后,我们用类似的一系列测试对患者进行评估。数据的分析从检验被试和对照组的同质性开始,对非配对数据进行t检验。采用chi2统计方法比较被试与对照组的定性变量。对于所有的统计检验,p < 0.05被认为是显著的。在有护理人员接受培训的患者组中,6个月后e- behavior - ad评分有统计学意义的显著下降(p < 0.001)(7.7比10.5;P < 0.001)。ADL、IADL和MMSE评分差异无统计学意义(ADL 4.7 vs. 4.3, p = 0.09;IADL 3.2 vs. 3.1, p =0.4;MMSE为17.3比15.1,p = 0.1)。文献中的大量证据强调了语言缺陷在痴呆症,特别是阿尔茨海默氏症中的中心地位。即使是部分地重建阿尔茨海默病患者和医生之间以及患者和护理人员之间的沟通渠道,也可以减少阿尔茨海默病患者行为障碍的频率和强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Behavioral disturbances in Alzheimer's disease: a non-pharmacological therapeutic approach.

Behavioral disturbances in patients with dementia are among the primary causes of institutionalization. Although the majority of authors agree that such symptoms are well controlled with non-pharmacological support, almost all studies have been focused on symptomatic drug therapy (typical or atypical neuroleptics). The aim of our study was to evaluate the reduction of psychiatric symptoms revealed with the test called empirical behavioral pathology in Alzheimer disease (E-Behave-AD) in a population of patients with AD whose caregivers underwent training to learn various communication strategies to utilize with family members. We evaluated 35 patients with AD (18 males, 17 females, average age 76.5 +/- 5.9 years). Of these patients, 18 (9 males, 9 females, average age 75.1 +/- 6.5 years) were relatives of caregivers who underwent training for six months, four group meetings and two individual ones. During the training, caregivers learned about the possibility of communication with persons with AD. They were taught how to interact with the AD patients in various phases of the illness and how to utilize effectively both verbal and non-verbal language. Other 17 patients (9 males, 8 females, average age 76.1 +/- 4.9 years) were followed as a control group. During the period of observation, all patients were given rivastigmine or donezepil. The two groups were homogenous for age, sex, antipsychotic drug therapy, and initial scores on mini-mental state examination (MMSE), activity of daily living (ADL), instrumental activity of daily living (IADL), and E-Behave-AD. After six months, we evaluated the patients with an analogous battery of tests. The analysis of data proceeded from the verification of homogeneity of test subjects and of the control group with t-test for non-paired data. We used the chi2 statistics to compare the qualitative variables between test subjects and the control group. For all statistical tests, a p < 0.05 was considered significant. In the group of patients with caregivers who underwent training, a statistically significant decrease in the E-Behave-AD score (p < 0.001) was observed after six months (7.7 vs. 10.5; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant modification in the scores for the ADL, IADL, and MMSE (ADL 4.7 vs. 4.3, p = 0.09; IADL 3.2 vs. 3.1, p =0.4; MMSE 17.3 vs. 15.1, p = 0.1). Numerous evidences in literature underline the centrality of the language deficit in dementia, particularly in AD. A re-establishment, even if partial, of the channels of communication between AD patients and doctors, as well as between patients and caregivers, can reduce the frequency and intensity of behavioral disturbances in persons with AD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease: a "real world" study. Assessment of the health status in the Massa Lombarda cohort: a preliminary description of the program evaluating cardio-cerebro-vascular disease risk factors and quality of life in an elderly population. Unconventional affective symptoms and executive functions after stroke in the elderly. Sleep disturbances in elderly: a subjective evaluation over 65. Prevalence of delirium in a geriatric convalescence hospitalization unit: patient's clinical characteristics and risk precipitating factor analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1