利用长短期记忆(LSTM)模型预测韩国 PM2.5。

IF 2.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s13143-022-00293-2
Chang-Hoi Ho, Ingyu Park, Jinwon Kim, Jae-Bum Lee
{"title":"利用长短期记忆(LSTM)模型预测韩国 PM2.5。","authors":"Chang-Hoi Ho,&nbsp;Ingyu Park,&nbsp;Jinwon Kim,&nbsp;Jae-Bum Lee","doi":"10.1007/s13143-022-00293-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The National Institute of Environmental Research, under the Ministry of Environment of Korea, provides two-day forecasts, through AirKorea, of the concentration of particulate matter with diameters of ≤ 2.5 μm (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) in terms of four grades (low, moderate, high, and very high) over 19 districts nationwide. Particulate grades are subjectively designated by human forecasters based on forecast results from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) and artificial intelligence (AI) models in conjunction with weather patterns. This study evaluates forecasts from the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm relative to those from CMAQ-solely and AirKorea using observations from 2019. The skills of the one-day PM<sub>2.5</sub> forecasts over the 19 districts were 39–70% for CMAQ, 72–79% for LSTM, and 73–80% for AirKorea; the AI forecasts showed comparable skills to the human forecasters at AirKorea. The one-day forecast skill levels of high and very high PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution grades are 31–98%, 31–74%, and 39–81% for the CMAQ-solely, the LSTM, and the AirKorea forecasts, respectively. Despite good skills for forecasting the high and very high events, CMAQ-solely forecasts also generate substantially higher false alarm rates (up to 86%) than the LSTM and AirKorea forecasts (up to 58%). Hence, applying only the LSTM model to the CMAQ forecasts can yield reasonable forecast skill levels comparable to the operational AirKorea forecasts that elaborately combine the CMAQ model, AI models, and human forecasters. The present results suggest that applications of appropriate AI models can greatly enhance PM<sub>2.5</sub> forecast skills for Korea in a more objective way.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8556,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences","volume":"59 5","pages":"563 - 576"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PM2.5 Forecast in Korea using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Model\",\"authors\":\"Chang-Hoi Ho,&nbsp;Ingyu Park,&nbsp;Jinwon Kim,&nbsp;Jae-Bum Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13143-022-00293-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The National Institute of Environmental Research, under the Ministry of Environment of Korea, provides two-day forecasts, through AirKorea, of the concentration of particulate matter with diameters of ≤ 2.5 μm (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) in terms of four grades (low, moderate, high, and very high) over 19 districts nationwide. Particulate grades are subjectively designated by human forecasters based on forecast results from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) and artificial intelligence (AI) models in conjunction with weather patterns. This study evaluates forecasts from the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm relative to those from CMAQ-solely and AirKorea using observations from 2019. The skills of the one-day PM<sub>2.5</sub> forecasts over the 19 districts were 39–70% for CMAQ, 72–79% for LSTM, and 73–80% for AirKorea; the AI forecasts showed comparable skills to the human forecasters at AirKorea. The one-day forecast skill levels of high and very high PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution grades are 31–98%, 31–74%, and 39–81% for the CMAQ-solely, the LSTM, and the AirKorea forecasts, respectively. Despite good skills for forecasting the high and very high events, CMAQ-solely forecasts also generate substantially higher false alarm rates (up to 86%) than the LSTM and AirKorea forecasts (up to 58%). Hence, applying only the LSTM model to the CMAQ forecasts can yield reasonable forecast skill levels comparable to the operational AirKorea forecasts that elaborately combine the CMAQ model, AI models, and human forecasters. The present results suggest that applications of appropriate AI models can greatly enhance PM<sub>2.5</sub> forecast skills for Korea in a more objective way.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences\",\"volume\":\"59 5\",\"pages\":\"563 - 576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483905/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13143-022-00293-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13143-022-00293-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

韩国环境部下属的国立环境研究院通过 AirKorea 提供全国 19 个地区直径 ≤ 2.5 μm 的颗粒物(PM2.5)浓度的两天预报,分为四个等级(低、中、高和极高)。颗粒物等级由人工预报员根据社区多尺度空气质量(CMAQ)和人工智能(AI)模型的预报结果,结合天气模式主观指定。本研究利用2019年的观测数据,评估了长短期记忆(LSTM)算法相对于CMAQ-solely和AirKorea算法的预测结果。CMAQ 对 19 个地区 PM2.5 的单日预报技能为 39-70%,LSTM 为 72-79%,AirKorea 为 73-80%;人工智能预报技能与 AirKorea 的人类预报员相当。CMAQ单独预测、LSTM预测和AirKorea预测的高和极高PM2.5污染等级的单日预测技能水平分别为31-98%、31-74%和39-81%。尽管 CMAQ-solely 对高和极高事件的预测能力很强,但其产生的误报率(高达 86%)也大大高于 LSTM 和 AirKorea 预测(高达 58%)。因此,仅将 LSTM 模型应用于 CMAQ 预测可产生合理的预测技能水平,可与将 CMAQ 模型、人工智能模型和人类预测人员精心组合的 AirKorea 运行预测相媲美。本结果表明,应用适当的人工智能模型可以更客观地大大提高韩国的 PM2.5 预测技能:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s13143-022-00293-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PM2.5 Forecast in Korea using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Model

The National Institute of Environmental Research, under the Ministry of Environment of Korea, provides two-day forecasts, through AirKorea, of the concentration of particulate matter with diameters of ≤ 2.5 μm (PM2.5) in terms of four grades (low, moderate, high, and very high) over 19 districts nationwide. Particulate grades are subjectively designated by human forecasters based on forecast results from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) and artificial intelligence (AI) models in conjunction with weather patterns. This study evaluates forecasts from the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm relative to those from CMAQ-solely and AirKorea using observations from 2019. The skills of the one-day PM2.5 forecasts over the 19 districts were 39–70% for CMAQ, 72–79% for LSTM, and 73–80% for AirKorea; the AI forecasts showed comparable skills to the human forecasters at AirKorea. The one-day forecast skill levels of high and very high PM2.5 pollution grades are 31–98%, 31–74%, and 39–81% for the CMAQ-solely, the LSTM, and the AirKorea forecasts, respectively. Despite good skills for forecasting the high and very high events, CMAQ-solely forecasts also generate substantially higher false alarm rates (up to 86%) than the LSTM and AirKorea forecasts (up to 58%). Hence, applying only the LSTM model to the CMAQ forecasts can yield reasonable forecast skill levels comparable to the operational AirKorea forecasts that elaborately combine the CMAQ model, AI models, and human forecasters. The present results suggest that applications of appropriate AI models can greatly enhance PM2.5 forecast skills for Korea in a more objective way.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (APJAS) is an international journal of the Korean Meteorological Society (KMS), published fully in English. It has started from 2008 by succeeding the KMS'' former journal, the Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society (JKMS), which published a total of 47 volumes as of 2011, in its time-honored tradition since 1965. Since 2008, the APJAS is included in the journal list of Thomson Reuters’ SCIE (Science Citation Index Expanded) and also in SCOPUS, the Elsevier Bibliographic Database, indicating the increased awareness and quality of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Variations in Wind Speed Intensity Across China and Their Association with Atmospheric Circulation Patterns Impact of Cloud Vertical Overlap on Cloud Radiative Effect in the Korean Integrated Model (KIM) Seasonal Simulations during Boreal Summer and Winter The Sensitivity of Extreme Rainfall Simulations to WRF Parameters During Two Intense Southwest Monsoon Events in the Philippines Abnormal Climate in 2022 Summer in Korea and Asia Correction to: Effects of Long-term Climate Change on Typhoon Rainfall Associated with Southwesterly Monsoon Flow near Taiwan: Mindulle (2004) and Morakot (2009)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1