双样本t检验与配对t检验的异同。

Manfei Xu, Drew Fralick, Julia Z Zheng, Bokai Wang, Xin M Tu, Changyong Feng
{"title":"双样本t检验与配对t检验的异同。","authors":"Manfei Xu,&nbsp;Drew Fralick,&nbsp;Julia Z Zheng,&nbsp;Bokai Wang,&nbsp;Xin M Tu,&nbsp;Changyong Feng","doi":"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In clinical research, comparisons of the results from experimental and control groups are often encountered. The two-sample <i>t</i>-test (also called independent samples <i>t</i>-test) and the paired <i>t</i>-test are probably the most widely used tests in statistics for the comparison of mean values between two samples. However, confusion exists with regard to the use of the two test methods, resulting in their inappropriate use. In this paper, we discuss the differences and similarities between these two <i>t</i>-tests. Three examples are used to illustrate the calculation procedures of the two-sample <i>t</i>-test and paired <i>t</i>-test.</p>","PeriodicalId":21886,"journal":{"name":"上海精神医学","volume":"29 3","pages":"184-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217070","citationCount":"116","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Differences and Similarities Between Two-Sample <i>T</i>-Test and Paired <i>T</i>-Test.\",\"authors\":\"Manfei Xu,&nbsp;Drew Fralick,&nbsp;Julia Z Zheng,&nbsp;Bokai Wang,&nbsp;Xin M Tu,&nbsp;Changyong Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In clinical research, comparisons of the results from experimental and control groups are often encountered. The two-sample <i>t</i>-test (also called independent samples <i>t</i>-test) and the paired <i>t</i>-test are probably the most widely used tests in statistics for the comparison of mean values between two samples. However, confusion exists with regard to the use of the two test methods, resulting in their inappropriate use. In this paper, we discuss the differences and similarities between these two <i>t</i>-tests. Three examples are used to illustrate the calculation procedures of the two-sample <i>t</i>-test and paired <i>t</i>-test.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"上海精神医学\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"184-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217070\",\"citationCount\":\"116\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"上海精神医学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海精神医学","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 116

摘要

在临床研究中,经常会遇到比较实验组和对照组的结果。两样本t检验(也称为独立样本t检验)和配对t检验可能是统计学中最广泛使用的检验,用于比较两个样本之间的平均值。然而,对于这两种测试方法的使用存在混淆,导致其使用不当。在本文中,我们讨论了这两个t检验之间的异同。用三个例子说明了两样本t检验和配对t检验的计算过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Differences and Similarities Between Two-Sample T-Test and Paired T-Test.

In clinical research, comparisons of the results from experimental and control groups are often encountered. The two-sample t-test (also called independent samples t-test) and the paired t-test are probably the most widely used tests in statistics for the comparison of mean values between two samples. However, confusion exists with regard to the use of the two test methods, resulting in their inappropriate use. In this paper, we discuss the differences and similarities between these two t-tests. Three examples are used to illustrate the calculation procedures of the two-sample t-test and paired t-test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2341
期刊介绍: Shanghai archives of psychiatry (bimonthly) was founded in 1959 and is sponsored by Shanghai Mental Health Center. The journal is aimed at mental health workers across the country, including psychiatrists and nurses, clinical psychologists, social workers, and people who are committed to the cause of mental health. It focuses on reporting clinical research results and practical experience in the field of psychiatry, and introduces the latest knowledge in psychiatry and related fields. The columns include monographs, case reports, clinical case discussions, reviews, mental health and law, and debates and discussions.
期刊最新文献
Research Progress in Biological Studies of Schizophrenia in China in 2017. An Association Study on the Cognitive Function and the Cerebral Grey Matter Volume of Patients with First-Episode Schizophrenia. A Comparison Study of Working Memory Deficits between Patients with Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Patients with Schizophrenia. Comparison of Olanzapine versus Other Second-Generation Antipsychotics in the Improvement of Insight and Medication Discontinuation Rate in Schizophrenia. The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Reinstatement of Methamphetamine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference in Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1