Bokai Wang, Pan Wu, Brian Kwan, Xin M Tu, Changyong Feng
{"title":"辛普森悖论:例子。","authors":"Bokai Wang, Pan Wu, Brian Kwan, Xin M Tu, Changyong Feng","doi":"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.218026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Simpson's paradox is very prevalent in many areas. It characterizes the inconsistency between the conditional and marginal interpretations of the data. In this paper, we illustrate through some examples how the Simpson's paradox can happen in continuous, categorical, and time-to-event data.</p>","PeriodicalId":21886,"journal":{"name":"Shanghai archives of psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/cd/sap-30-139.PMC5936043.pdf","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simpson's Paradox: Examples.\",\"authors\":\"Bokai Wang, Pan Wu, Brian Kwan, Xin M Tu, Changyong Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.218026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Simpson's paradox is very prevalent in many areas. It characterizes the inconsistency between the conditional and marginal interpretations of the data. In this paper, we illustrate through some examples how the Simpson's paradox can happen in continuous, categorical, and time-to-event data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shanghai archives of psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/cd/sap-30-139.PMC5936043.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shanghai archives of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.218026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shanghai archives of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.218026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simpson's paradox is very prevalent in many areas. It characterizes the inconsistency between the conditional and marginal interpretations of the data. In this paper, we illustrate through some examples how the Simpson's paradox can happen in continuous, categorical, and time-to-event data.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
