社区居住的非肌肉减少症老年人的肥胖、身体功能和训练成功。

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging Research Pub Date : 2019-02-18 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/5340328
O G Geirsdottir, M Chang, P V Jonsson, I Thorsdottir, A Ramel
{"title":"社区居住的非肌肉减少症老年人的肥胖、身体功能和训练成功。","authors":"O G Geirsdottir,&nbsp;M Chang,&nbsp;P V Jonsson,&nbsp;I Thorsdottir,&nbsp;A Ramel","doi":"10.1155/2019/5340328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Obesity-related physiological changes can limit improvements of obese subjects after training. The aim was to investigate obesity, muscular strength, and physical function in community-dwelling nonsarcopenic old adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nonsarcopenic subjects (<i>N</i>=229, 73.7 ± 5.7 years; 21% normal weight, 42% overweight, and 37% obese based on body mass index (BMI)) participated in a 12-week resistance exercise program. Leisure time physical activity (LTPA), body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), quadriceps strength (maximum voluntary isometric contraction; absolute and relative to body weight), and physical function in terms of 6-minutes-walk-for-distance (6MWD) and timed up and go (TUG) were measured baseline and endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, normal weight participants had lower absolute quadriceps strength (-43 ± 22 N, <i>P</i>=0.015) than obese, but better quadriceps strength relative to body weight (1.4 ± 0.7 N/kg, <i>P</i> < 0.001), 6MWD (53 ± 27 m, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and TUG (-1.4 ± 0.7 sec, <i>P</i> ≤ 0.001). LTPA was positively associated with 6MWD and TUG (both <i>P</i> < 0.05), but based on general linear models, differences in LTPA between BMI categories did not explain differences in 6MWD and TUG between BMI categories. During the program, dropout (11.9%) and attendance (85%) were similar between BMI groups. After the intervention, body composition and physical function significantly improved in all three BMI categories; however, normal weight participants lost more body fat (-1.53 ± 0.78%, <i>P</i>=0.014), gained more lean mass (0.70 ± 0.36 kg, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and relative quadriceps strength (0.31 ± 0.16 N/kg, <i>P</i>=0.017), and improved more on the 6MWD (24 ± 12 m, <i>P</i> < 0.001) but gained less grip strength (-2.4 ± 1.3 N/kg, <i>P</i>=0.020) compared to obese. There were no differences in TUG or absolute quadriceps strength changes between the BMI strata. Physical function at baseline as well as training success of overweight participants was located between the normal weight and obesity groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nonsarcopenic obese community-dwelling old adults have lower physical function than their normal weight counterparts. This difference is not explained by lower LTPA. A 12-week resistance exercise program improves body composition and physical function in normal weight, overweight, and obese old adults; however, obese participants experience less favorable changes in body composition and physical function than normal weight individuals. This trial is registered with NCT01074879.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2019 ","pages":"5340328"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/5340328","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obesity, Physical Function, and Training Success in Community-Dwelling Nonsarcopenic Old Adults.\",\"authors\":\"O G Geirsdottir,&nbsp;M Chang,&nbsp;P V Jonsson,&nbsp;I Thorsdottir,&nbsp;A Ramel\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2019/5340328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Obesity-related physiological changes can limit improvements of obese subjects after training. The aim was to investigate obesity, muscular strength, and physical function in community-dwelling nonsarcopenic old adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nonsarcopenic subjects (<i>N</i>=229, 73.7 ± 5.7 years; 21% normal weight, 42% overweight, and 37% obese based on body mass index (BMI)) participated in a 12-week resistance exercise program. Leisure time physical activity (LTPA), body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), quadriceps strength (maximum voluntary isometric contraction; absolute and relative to body weight), and physical function in terms of 6-minutes-walk-for-distance (6MWD) and timed up and go (TUG) were measured baseline and endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, normal weight participants had lower absolute quadriceps strength (-43 ± 22 N, <i>P</i>=0.015) than obese, but better quadriceps strength relative to body weight (1.4 ± 0.7 N/kg, <i>P</i> < 0.001), 6MWD (53 ± 27 m, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and TUG (-1.4 ± 0.7 sec, <i>P</i> ≤ 0.001). LTPA was positively associated with 6MWD and TUG (both <i>P</i> < 0.05), but based on general linear models, differences in LTPA between BMI categories did not explain differences in 6MWD and TUG between BMI categories. During the program, dropout (11.9%) and attendance (85%) were similar between BMI groups. After the intervention, body composition and physical function significantly improved in all three BMI categories; however, normal weight participants lost more body fat (-1.53 ± 0.78%, <i>P</i>=0.014), gained more lean mass (0.70 ± 0.36 kg, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and relative quadriceps strength (0.31 ± 0.16 N/kg, <i>P</i>=0.017), and improved more on the 6MWD (24 ± 12 m, <i>P</i> < 0.001) but gained less grip strength (-2.4 ± 1.3 N/kg, <i>P</i>=0.020) compared to obese. There were no differences in TUG or absolute quadriceps strength changes between the BMI strata. Physical function at baseline as well as training success of overweight participants was located between the normal weight and obesity groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nonsarcopenic obese community-dwelling old adults have lower physical function than their normal weight counterparts. This difference is not explained by lower LTPA. A 12-week resistance exercise program improves body composition and physical function in normal weight, overweight, and obese old adults; however, obese participants experience less favorable changes in body composition and physical function than normal weight individuals. This trial is registered with NCT01074879.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging Research\",\"volume\":\"2019 \",\"pages\":\"5340328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/5340328\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5340328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5340328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:肥胖相关的生理变化可能限制肥胖受试者训练后的改善。目的是调查居住在社区的非肌肉减少症老年人的肥胖、肌肉力量和身体功能。方法:非肌少症患者229例,73.7±5.7岁;21%的人体重正常,42%的人超重,37%的人肥胖(基于身体质量指数(BMI))参加了为期12周的阻力运动计划。闲暇时间体力活动(LTPA),身体成分(双能x线吸收仪),股四头肌力量(最大自主等长收缩;绝对体重和相对体重),以及6分钟步行距离(6MWD)和起床时间(TUG)的身体功能进行基线和终点测量。结果:在基线时,体重正常的参与者的股四头肌绝对力量(-43±22 N, P=0.015)低于肥胖的参与者,但股四头肌力量相对于体重(1.4±0.7 N/kg, P < 0.001), 6MWD(53±27 m, P < 0.001)和TUG(-1.4±0.7 sec, P≤0.001)更好。LTPA与6MWD和TUG呈正相关(均P < 0.05),但基于一般线性模型,BMI类别间LTPA的差异并不能解释BMI类别间6MWD和TUG的差异。在项目期间,BMI组之间的辍学率(11.9%)和出勤率(85%)相似。干预后,三个BMI类别的身体成分和身体功能均有显著改善;然而,与肥胖的参与者相比,正常体重的参与者减少了更多的体脂(-1.53±0.78%,P=0.014),增加了更多的瘦质量(0.70±0.36 kg, P < 0.001)和相对股四头肌力量(0.31±0.16 N/kg, P=0.017),并且在6MWD(24±12 m, P < 0.001)上改善更多,但握力(-2.4±1.3 N/kg, P=0.020)增加较少。在BMI层之间,TUG或绝对股四头肌力量变化没有差异。超重参与者在基线时的身体机能和训练成功率介于正常体重组和肥胖组之间。结论:非肌肉减少型肥胖社区老年人的身体机能低于正常体重的老年人。这种差异不能用较低的LTPA来解释。一项为期12周的抗阻运动计划可以改善正常体重、超重和肥胖老年人的身体成分和身体功能;然而,肥胖参与者在身体组成和身体功能方面的变化不如正常体重的人。该试验注册号为NCT01074879。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Obesity, Physical Function, and Training Success in Community-Dwelling Nonsarcopenic Old Adults.

Objectives: Obesity-related physiological changes can limit improvements of obese subjects after training. The aim was to investigate obesity, muscular strength, and physical function in community-dwelling nonsarcopenic old adults.

Methods: Nonsarcopenic subjects (N=229, 73.7 ± 5.7 years; 21% normal weight, 42% overweight, and 37% obese based on body mass index (BMI)) participated in a 12-week resistance exercise program. Leisure time physical activity (LTPA), body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), quadriceps strength (maximum voluntary isometric contraction; absolute and relative to body weight), and physical function in terms of 6-minutes-walk-for-distance (6MWD) and timed up and go (TUG) were measured baseline and endpoint.

Results: At baseline, normal weight participants had lower absolute quadriceps strength (-43 ± 22 N, P=0.015) than obese, but better quadriceps strength relative to body weight (1.4 ± 0.7 N/kg, P < 0.001), 6MWD (53 ± 27 m, P < 0.001), and TUG (-1.4 ± 0.7 sec, P ≤ 0.001). LTPA was positively associated with 6MWD and TUG (both P < 0.05), but based on general linear models, differences in LTPA between BMI categories did not explain differences in 6MWD and TUG between BMI categories. During the program, dropout (11.9%) and attendance (85%) were similar between BMI groups. After the intervention, body composition and physical function significantly improved in all three BMI categories; however, normal weight participants lost more body fat (-1.53 ± 0.78%, P=0.014), gained more lean mass (0.70 ± 0.36 kg, P < 0.001) and relative quadriceps strength (0.31 ± 0.16 N/kg, P=0.017), and improved more on the 6MWD (24 ± 12 m, P < 0.001) but gained less grip strength (-2.4 ± 1.3 N/kg, P=0.020) compared to obese. There were no differences in TUG or absolute quadriceps strength changes between the BMI strata. Physical function at baseline as well as training success of overweight participants was located between the normal weight and obesity groups.

Conclusion: Nonsarcopenic obese community-dwelling old adults have lower physical function than their normal weight counterparts. This difference is not explained by lower LTPA. A 12-week resistance exercise program improves body composition and physical function in normal weight, overweight, and obese old adults; however, obese participants experience less favorable changes in body composition and physical function than normal weight individuals. This trial is registered with NCT01074879.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring Changes in Barriers and Facilitators for Physical Activity during the Retirement Transition: A Qualitative Interview Study Based on the Behavior Change Wheel. Nurses' Perspectives and Understanding of Sarcopenia in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Lack of Intensity Control during an Exercise Program Is Related to a Limited Effect on Variables Responsible for Blood Pressure Regulation in Hypertensive Older Adults. Sleep Quality and Subjective Cognitive Decline among Older Adults: The Mediating Role of Anxiety/Depression and Worries. Effects of Mind-Body Qigong Exercise on Overall Health, Fatigue/Sleep, and Cognition in Older Chinese Immigrants in the US: An Intervention Study with Control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1