全卷积结构与滑动窗口CNN在角膜内皮细胞分割中的应用。

BMC biomedical engineering Pub Date : 2019-01-30 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s42490-019-0003-2
Juan P Vigueras-Guillén, Busra Sari, Stanley F Goes, Hans G Lemij, Jeroen van Rooij, Koenraad A Vermeer, Lucas J van Vliet
{"title":"全卷积结构与滑动窗口CNN在角膜内皮细胞分割中的应用。","authors":"Juan P Vigueras-Guillén,&nbsp;Busra Sari,&nbsp;Stanley F Goes,&nbsp;Hans G Lemij,&nbsp;Jeroen van Rooij,&nbsp;Koenraad A Vermeer,&nbsp;Lucas J van Vliet","doi":"10.1186/s42490-019-0003-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corneal endothelium (CE) images provide valuable clinical information regarding the health state of the cornea. Computation of the clinical morphometric parameters requires the segmentation of endothelial cell images. Current techniques to image the endothelium in vivo deliver low quality images, which makes automatic segmentation a complicated task. Here, we present two convolutional neural networks (CNN) to segment CE images: a global fully convolutional approach based on U-net, and a local sliding-window network (SW-net). We propose to use probabilistic labels instead of binary, we evaluate a preprocessing method to enhance the contrast of images, and we introduce a postprocessing method based on Fourier analysis and watershed to convert the CNN output images into the final cell segmentation. Both methods are applied to 50 images acquired with an SP-1P Topcon specular microscope. Estimates are compared against a manual delineation made by a trained observer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>U-net (AUC=0.9938) yields slightly sharper, clearer images than SW-net (AUC=0.9921). After postprocessing, U-net obtains a DICE=0.981 and a MHD=0.22 (modified Hausdorff distance), whereas SW-net yields a DICE=0.978 and a MHD=0.30. U-net generates a wrong cell segmentation in only 0.48% of the cells, versus 0.92% for the SW-net. U-net achieves statistically significant better precision and accuracy than both, Topcon and SW-net, for the estimates of three clinical parameters: cell density (ECD), polymegethism (CV), and pleomorphism (HEX). The mean relative error in U-net for the parameters is 0.4% in ECD, 2.8% in CV, and 1.3% in HEX. The computation time to segment an image and estimate the parameters is barely a few seconds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both methods presented here provide a statistically significant improvement over the state of the art. U-net has reached the smallest error rate. We suggest a segmentation refinement based on our previous work to further improve the performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":72425,"journal":{"name":"BMC biomedical engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s42490-019-0003-2","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fully convolutional architecture vs sliding-window CNN for corneal endothelium cell segmentation.\",\"authors\":\"Juan P Vigueras-Guillén,&nbsp;Busra Sari,&nbsp;Stanley F Goes,&nbsp;Hans G Lemij,&nbsp;Jeroen van Rooij,&nbsp;Koenraad A Vermeer,&nbsp;Lucas J van Vliet\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42490-019-0003-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corneal endothelium (CE) images provide valuable clinical information regarding the health state of the cornea. Computation of the clinical morphometric parameters requires the segmentation of endothelial cell images. Current techniques to image the endothelium in vivo deliver low quality images, which makes automatic segmentation a complicated task. Here, we present two convolutional neural networks (CNN) to segment CE images: a global fully convolutional approach based on U-net, and a local sliding-window network (SW-net). We propose to use probabilistic labels instead of binary, we evaluate a preprocessing method to enhance the contrast of images, and we introduce a postprocessing method based on Fourier analysis and watershed to convert the CNN output images into the final cell segmentation. Both methods are applied to 50 images acquired with an SP-1P Topcon specular microscope. Estimates are compared against a manual delineation made by a trained observer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>U-net (AUC=0.9938) yields slightly sharper, clearer images than SW-net (AUC=0.9921). After postprocessing, U-net obtains a DICE=0.981 and a MHD=0.22 (modified Hausdorff distance), whereas SW-net yields a DICE=0.978 and a MHD=0.30. U-net generates a wrong cell segmentation in only 0.48% of the cells, versus 0.92% for the SW-net. U-net achieves statistically significant better precision and accuracy than both, Topcon and SW-net, for the estimates of three clinical parameters: cell density (ECD), polymegethism (CV), and pleomorphism (HEX). The mean relative error in U-net for the parameters is 0.4% in ECD, 2.8% in CV, and 1.3% in HEX. The computation time to segment an image and estimate the parameters is barely a few seconds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both methods presented here provide a statistically significant improvement over the state of the art. U-net has reached the smallest error rate. We suggest a segmentation refinement based on our previous work to further improve the performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC biomedical engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s42490-019-0003-2\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC biomedical engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42490-019-0003-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42490-019-0003-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

背景:角膜内皮(CE)图像提供了有关角膜健康状况的有价值的临床信息。临床形态学参数的计算需要对内皮细胞图像进行分割。目前的活体内皮成像技术图像质量较差,使得自动分割成为一项复杂的任务。在这里,我们提出了两个卷积神经网络(CNN)来分割CE图像:一个基于U-net的全局全卷积方法,和一个局部滑动窗口网络(ws -net)。我们提出用概率标记代替二值化,评估了一种增强图像对比度的预处理方法,并引入了一种基于傅里叶分析和分水岭的后处理方法,将CNN输出图像转换为最终的细胞分割。两种方法应用于SP-1P Topcon镜面显微镜获得的50幅图像。将估计值与训练有素的观察员所作的人工描述进行比较。结果:U-net (AUC=0.9938)的图像比SW-net (AUC=0.9921)略清晰。经过后处理,U-net得到DICE=0.981, MHD=0.22(修正Hausdorff距离),而w -net得到DICE=0.978, MHD=0.30。U-net仅在0.48%的细胞中产生错误的细胞分割,而SW-net为0.92%。在三个临床参数:细胞密度(ECD)、多聚性(CV)和多形性(HEX)的估计方面,U-net比Topcon和SW-net具有统计学上显著的精度和准确性。在U-net中,ECD参数的平均相对误差为0.4%,CV为2.8%,HEX为1.3%。分割图像和估计参数的计算时间仅为几秒钟。结论:这里提出的两种方法都提供了统计上显著的改进。U-net已经达到了最小的错误率。我们建议在之前工作的基础上进行细分细化,以进一步提高性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fully convolutional architecture vs sliding-window CNN for corneal endothelium cell segmentation.

Background: Corneal endothelium (CE) images provide valuable clinical information regarding the health state of the cornea. Computation of the clinical morphometric parameters requires the segmentation of endothelial cell images. Current techniques to image the endothelium in vivo deliver low quality images, which makes automatic segmentation a complicated task. Here, we present two convolutional neural networks (CNN) to segment CE images: a global fully convolutional approach based on U-net, and a local sliding-window network (SW-net). We propose to use probabilistic labels instead of binary, we evaluate a preprocessing method to enhance the contrast of images, and we introduce a postprocessing method based on Fourier analysis and watershed to convert the CNN output images into the final cell segmentation. Both methods are applied to 50 images acquired with an SP-1P Topcon specular microscope. Estimates are compared against a manual delineation made by a trained observer.

Results: U-net (AUC=0.9938) yields slightly sharper, clearer images than SW-net (AUC=0.9921). After postprocessing, U-net obtains a DICE=0.981 and a MHD=0.22 (modified Hausdorff distance), whereas SW-net yields a DICE=0.978 and a MHD=0.30. U-net generates a wrong cell segmentation in only 0.48% of the cells, versus 0.92% for the SW-net. U-net achieves statistically significant better precision and accuracy than both, Topcon and SW-net, for the estimates of three clinical parameters: cell density (ECD), polymegethism (CV), and pleomorphism (HEX). The mean relative error in U-net for the parameters is 0.4% in ECD, 2.8% in CV, and 1.3% in HEX. The computation time to segment an image and estimate the parameters is barely a few seconds.

Conclusions: Both methods presented here provide a statistically significant improvement over the state of the art. U-net has reached the smallest error rate. We suggest a segmentation refinement based on our previous work to further improve the performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
The neurophysiology of sensorimotor prosthetic control. Multi-parameter viscoelastic material model for denture adhesives based on time-temperature superposition and multiple linear regression analysis. The effect of using the hip exoskeleton assistive (HEXA) robot compared to conventional physiotherapy on clinical functional outcomes in stroke patients with hemiplegia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Short-term epileptic seizures prediction based on cepstrum analysis and signal morphology. A handheld device for intra-cavity and ex vivo fluorescence imaging of breast conserving surgery margins with 5-aminolevulinic acid.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1