持续的研究监测提高了研究人员的研究行为质量和遵守情况:监测方案的内部评估。

Q2 Multidisciplinary AAS Open Research Pub Date : 2020-11-25 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.12688/aasopenres.13117.1
Mirriam Akello, Sarah Coutinho, Mary Gorrethy N-Mboowa, Victoria D Bukirwa, Agnes Natukunda, Lawrence Lubyayi, Grace Nabakooza, Stephen Cose, Alison M Elliott
{"title":"持续的研究监测提高了研究人员的研究行为质量和遵守情况:监测方案的内部评估。","authors":"Mirriam Akello, Sarah Coutinho, Mary Gorrethy N-Mboowa, Victoria D Bukirwa, Agnes Natukunda, Lawrence Lubyayi, Grace Nabakooza, Stephen Cose, Alison M Elliott","doi":"10.12688/aasopenres.13117.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Research site monitoring (RSM) is an effective way to ensure compliance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP). However, RSM is not offered to trainees (investigators) at African Institutions routinely. The Makerere University/Uganda Virus Research Institute Centre of Excellence in Infection and Immunity Research and Training (MUII-Plus) introduced internal monitoring to promote the quality of trainees' research projects. Here, we share our monitoring model, experiences and achievements, and challenges encountered. <b>Methods:</b> We analysed investigators' project reports from monitoring visits undertaken from April 2017 to December 2019. Monitors followed a standard checklist to review investigator site files and record forms, and toured site facilities. We planned four monitoring visits for each trainee: one at site initiation, two interim, and a closeout monitoring visit. A team of two monitors conducted the visits. <b>Results:</b> We monitored 25 out of the 26 research projects in progress between April 2017 and December 2019. Compliance with protocols, standard operating procedures, GCP, and GCLP improved with each monitoring visit. Median (IQR) compliance rate was 43% (31%, 44%) at site initiation visit for different monitoring items, 70% (54%, 90%) at the 1st interim monitoring visit, 100% (92%, 100%) at 2nd interim monitoring visit and all projects achieved 100% compliance at site closeout.  All investigators had good work ethics and practice, and appropriate facilities. Initially, some investigators' files lacked essential documents, and informed consent processes needed to be improved. We realized that non-compliant investigators had not received prior training in GCP/GCLP, so we offered them this training. <b>Conclusions:</b> Routine monitoring helps identify non-compliance early and improves the quality of research. We recommend continuous internal monitoring for all research studies. Investigators conducting research involving human subjects should receive GCP/GCLP training before commencing their projects. Institutional higher degrees and research ethics committees should enforce this as a requirement for project approvals.</p>","PeriodicalId":34179,"journal":{"name":"AAS Open Research","volume":" ","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous research monitoring improves the quality of research conduct and compliance among research trainees: internal evaluation of a monitoring programme.\",\"authors\":\"Mirriam Akello, Sarah Coutinho, Mary Gorrethy N-Mboowa, Victoria D Bukirwa, Agnes Natukunda, Lawrence Lubyayi, Grace Nabakooza, Stephen Cose, Alison M Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/aasopenres.13117.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Research site monitoring (RSM) is an effective way to ensure compliance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP). However, RSM is not offered to trainees (investigators) at African Institutions routinely. The Makerere University/Uganda Virus Research Institute Centre of Excellence in Infection and Immunity Research and Training (MUII-Plus) introduced internal monitoring to promote the quality of trainees' research projects. Here, we share our monitoring model, experiences and achievements, and challenges encountered. <b>Methods:</b> We analysed investigators' project reports from monitoring visits undertaken from April 2017 to December 2019. Monitors followed a standard checklist to review investigator site files and record forms, and toured site facilities. We planned four monitoring visits for each trainee: one at site initiation, two interim, and a closeout monitoring visit. A team of two monitors conducted the visits. <b>Results:</b> We monitored 25 out of the 26 research projects in progress between April 2017 and December 2019. Compliance with protocols, standard operating procedures, GCP, and GCLP improved with each monitoring visit. Median (IQR) compliance rate was 43% (31%, 44%) at site initiation visit for different monitoring items, 70% (54%, 90%) at the 1st interim monitoring visit, 100% (92%, 100%) at 2nd interim monitoring visit and all projects achieved 100% compliance at site closeout.  All investigators had good work ethics and practice, and appropriate facilities. Initially, some investigators' files lacked essential documents, and informed consent processes needed to be improved. We realized that non-compliant investigators had not received prior training in GCP/GCLP, so we offered them this training. <b>Conclusions:</b> Routine monitoring helps identify non-compliance early and improves the quality of research. We recommend continuous internal monitoring for all research studies. Investigators conducting research involving human subjects should receive GCP/GCLP training before commencing their projects. Institutional higher degrees and research ethics committees should enforce this as a requirement for project approvals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAS Open Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170533/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAS Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13117.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAS Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13117.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究现场监控 (RSM) 是确保遵守良好临床实践 (GCP) 的有效方法。然而,非洲机构并没有为受训人员(研究人员)提供常规的 RSM。马凯雷雷大学/乌干达病毒研究所感染与免疫研究培训卓越中心(MUII-Plus)引入了内部监控,以提高受训人员研究项目的质量。在此,我们与大家分享我们的监督模式、经验和成就以及遇到的挑战。方法:我们分析了从 2017 年 4 月至 2019 年 12 月进行的监督访问中调查人员的项目报告。监督员按照标准核对表审查调查员的现场档案和记录表,并参观了现场设施。我们为每位受训者计划了四次监查访问:一次在研究点启动时,两次在中期,还有一次是结题监查访问。由两名监督员组成的小组进行了访问。结果:我们对 2017 年 4 月至 2019 年 12 月期间正在进行的 26 个研究项目中的 25 个项目进行了监督。每次监测访问后,协议、标准操作程序、GCP 和 GCLP 的合规性都有所提高。不同监测项目的合规率中位数(IQR)分别为:研究机构启动考察时43%(31%,44%),第一次中期监测考察时70%(54%,90%),第二次中期监测考察时100%(92%,100%),所有项目在研究机构结题时均达到100%合规。 所有调查员都有良好的职业道德和行为习惯,并有适当的设施。起初,一些调查员的档案缺少重要文件,知情同意程序也需要改进。我们意识到,不合规的研究人员之前没有接受过 GCP/GCLP 方面的培训,因此我们为他们提供了这方面的培训。结论:常规监控有助于及早发现违规行为,提高研究质量。我们建议对所有研究进行持续的内部监控。开展涉及人类受试者研究的研究人员应在项目开始前接受 GCP/GCLP 培训。高等院校和研究伦理委员会应将此作为项目审批的一项要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Continuous research monitoring improves the quality of research conduct and compliance among research trainees: internal evaluation of a monitoring programme.

Background: Research site monitoring (RSM) is an effective way to ensure compliance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP). However, RSM is not offered to trainees (investigators) at African Institutions routinely. The Makerere University/Uganda Virus Research Institute Centre of Excellence in Infection and Immunity Research and Training (MUII-Plus) introduced internal monitoring to promote the quality of trainees' research projects. Here, we share our monitoring model, experiences and achievements, and challenges encountered. Methods: We analysed investigators' project reports from monitoring visits undertaken from April 2017 to December 2019. Monitors followed a standard checklist to review investigator site files and record forms, and toured site facilities. We planned four monitoring visits for each trainee: one at site initiation, two interim, and a closeout monitoring visit. A team of two monitors conducted the visits. Results: We monitored 25 out of the 26 research projects in progress between April 2017 and December 2019. Compliance with protocols, standard operating procedures, GCP, and GCLP improved with each monitoring visit. Median (IQR) compliance rate was 43% (31%, 44%) at site initiation visit for different monitoring items, 70% (54%, 90%) at the 1st interim monitoring visit, 100% (92%, 100%) at 2nd interim monitoring visit and all projects achieved 100% compliance at site closeout.  All investigators had good work ethics and practice, and appropriate facilities. Initially, some investigators' files lacked essential documents, and informed consent processes needed to be improved. We realized that non-compliant investigators had not received prior training in GCP/GCLP, so we offered them this training. Conclusions: Routine monitoring helps identify non-compliance early and improves the quality of research. We recommend continuous internal monitoring for all research studies. Investigators conducting research involving human subjects should receive GCP/GCLP training before commencing their projects. Institutional higher degrees and research ethics committees should enforce this as a requirement for project approvals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AAS Open Research
AAS Open Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Delays in initiating rabies post-exposure prophylaxis among dog bite victims in Wakiso and Kampala districts, Uganda. Stigma-directed services (Stig2Health) to improve 'linkage to care' for people living with HIV in rural Tanzania: study protocol for a nested pre-post implementation study within the Kilombero and Ulanga Antiretroviral Cohort. Case studies from the experience of early career researchers in East Africa in building community engagement in research. Small area estimation for South African resource distribution and policy impacts during COVID-19 Building community and public engagement in research – the experience of early career researchers in East Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1