比较飞虫垂直力产生尺度的常用方法的评价

IF 2.2 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Current Research in Insect Science Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cris.2022.100042
Nicholas P. Burnett, Emily L. Keliher, Stacey A. Combes
{"title":"比较飞虫垂直力产生尺度的常用方法的评价","authors":"Nicholas P. Burnett,&nbsp;Emily L. Keliher,&nbsp;Stacey A. Combes","doi":"10.1016/j.cris.2022.100042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Maximum vertical force production (F<sub>vert</sub>) is an integral measure of flight performance that generally scales with size. Numerous methods of measuring F<sub>vert</sub> and body size are accessible to entomologists, but we do not know whether method selection affects inter- and intraspecific comparisons of F<sub>vert</sub>-size scaling. We compared two common techniques for measuring F<sub>vert</sub> in bumblebees (<em>Bombus impatiens</em>) and mason bees (<em>Osmia lignaria</em>), and examined F<sub>vert</sub> scaling using five size metrics. F<sub>vert</sub> results were similar with incremental or asymptotic load-lifting, but scaling analyses were sensitive to the size metric used. Analyses based on some size metrics indicated similar scaling exponents and coefficients between species, whereas other metrics indicated coefficients that differed by up to 18%. Furthermore, F<sub>vert</sub> showed isometry with body lengths and fed and starved masses, but negative allometry with dry mass. We conclude that F<sub>vert</sub> can be measured using either incremental or asymptotic loading but choosing a size metric for scaling studies requires careful consideration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34629,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Insect Science","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9387496/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of common methods for comparing the scaling of vertical force production in flying insects\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas P. Burnett,&nbsp;Emily L. Keliher,&nbsp;Stacey A. Combes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cris.2022.100042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Maximum vertical force production (F<sub>vert</sub>) is an integral measure of flight performance that generally scales with size. Numerous methods of measuring F<sub>vert</sub> and body size are accessible to entomologists, but we do not know whether method selection affects inter- and intraspecific comparisons of F<sub>vert</sub>-size scaling. We compared two common techniques for measuring F<sub>vert</sub> in bumblebees (<em>Bombus impatiens</em>) and mason bees (<em>Osmia lignaria</em>), and examined F<sub>vert</sub> scaling using five size metrics. F<sub>vert</sub> results were similar with incremental or asymptotic load-lifting, but scaling analyses were sensitive to the size metric used. Analyses based on some size metrics indicated similar scaling exponents and coefficients between species, whereas other metrics indicated coefficients that differed by up to 18%. Furthermore, F<sub>vert</sub> showed isometry with body lengths and fed and starved masses, but negative allometry with dry mass. We conclude that F<sub>vert</sub> can be measured using either incremental or asymptotic loading but choosing a size metric for scaling studies requires careful consideration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Research in Insect Science\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9387496/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Research in Insect Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515822000142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515822000142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最大垂直力产生(Fvert)是飞行性能的一个整体衡量标准,通常与尺寸成比例。昆虫学家可以使用许多方法来测量虫体大小,但我们不知道方法选择是否会影响虫体大小尺度的种间和种内比较。我们比较了测量大黄蜂(Bombus impatiens)和泥石蜂(Osmia lignaria)的两种常用技术,并使用五种尺寸指标检查了Fvert缩放。vert结果与增量或渐近负荷提升相似,但尺度分析对所使用的尺寸度量很敏感。基于一些尺度指标的分析表明,物种之间的尺度指数和系数相似,而其他指标显示的系数差异高达18%。与体长、饱食质量呈等距,与干质量呈负异速。我们的结论是,vvert可以使用增量或渐近加载来测量,但选择缩放研究的尺寸度量需要仔细考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An evaluation of common methods for comparing the scaling of vertical force production in flying insects

Maximum vertical force production (Fvert) is an integral measure of flight performance that generally scales with size. Numerous methods of measuring Fvert and body size are accessible to entomologists, but we do not know whether method selection affects inter- and intraspecific comparisons of Fvert-size scaling. We compared two common techniques for measuring Fvert in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens) and mason bees (Osmia lignaria), and examined Fvert scaling using five size metrics. Fvert results were similar with incremental or asymptotic load-lifting, but scaling analyses were sensitive to the size metric used. Analyses based on some size metrics indicated similar scaling exponents and coefficients between species, whereas other metrics indicated coefficients that differed by up to 18%. Furthermore, Fvert showed isometry with body lengths and fed and starved masses, but negative allometry with dry mass. We conclude that Fvert can be measured using either incremental or asymptotic loading but choosing a size metric for scaling studies requires careful consideration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Research in Insect Science
Current Research in Insect Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
36 days
期刊最新文献
The nutritional dimension of facultative bacterial symbiosis in aphids: Current status and methodological considerations for future research Diapause survival requires a temperature-sensitive preparatory period Identification of a receptor for the sex pheromone of the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus Response of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) genotypes to natural infestation by scale insect pest Stictococcus vayssierei Richard (Hemiptera: Stictococcidae) An enigmatic Cretaceous beetle with possible affinity to Erotylidae (Coleoptera: Cucujiformia)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1