饮食失调的反刍反应量表:葡萄牙社区样本中的双因子模型和测量不变性。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2024-01-02 Epub Date: 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1080/10640266.2023.2259676
Cristiana C Marques, Paula Castilho, Ana Telma Pereira, Kenneth Goss, Miguel Castelo-Branco, António Macedo
{"title":"饮食失调的反刍反应量表:葡萄牙社区样本中的双因子模型和测量不变性。","authors":"Cristiana C Marques, Paula Castilho, Ana Telma Pereira, Kenneth Goss, Miguel Castelo-Branco, António Macedo","doi":"10.1080/10640266.2023.2259676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Ruminative Response Scale for Eating Disorders (RRS-ED) measures ruminative thought content specifically related to eating disordered themes, assessing two domains of rumination, brooding and reflection. This study aims to examine the factor structure of the RRS-ED in a Portuguese community sample, using correlated two-factor models, unifactorial and bifactor models and test for invariance across sex. A sample of 535 adults (179 male; 356 female) filled out the RRS-ED. A subsample (<i>n</i>=347) answered additional measures of repetitive negative thinking and eating psychopathology. The bifactor model of the RRS-ED provided the best fit, demonstrating a reliable general rumination factor. Also, the bifactor model of the RRS-ED was invariant across sex. RRS-ED showed moderate to strong correlations with negative perseverative thinking and eating psychopathology. Both domain-specific factors of RRS-ED were associated with higher levels of eating psychopathology. Findings indicate that RRS-ED is a reliable and valid measure to assess the ruminative response from the general population in Portugal, showing initial evidence that supports the use of a total score of RRS-ED as an overall measure of rumination, while specific factor scores should be reported with caution. Future studies are needed to replicate the findings and further corroborate the unidimensionality of the RRS-ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":48835,"journal":{"name":"Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"60-80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ruminative response scale for eating disorders: bifactor model and measurement invariance in a Portuguese community sample.\",\"authors\":\"Cristiana C Marques, Paula Castilho, Ana Telma Pereira, Kenneth Goss, Miguel Castelo-Branco, António Macedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10640266.2023.2259676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Ruminative Response Scale for Eating Disorders (RRS-ED) measures ruminative thought content specifically related to eating disordered themes, assessing two domains of rumination, brooding and reflection. This study aims to examine the factor structure of the RRS-ED in a Portuguese community sample, using correlated two-factor models, unifactorial and bifactor models and test for invariance across sex. A sample of 535 adults (179 male; 356 female) filled out the RRS-ED. A subsample (<i>n</i>=347) answered additional measures of repetitive negative thinking and eating psychopathology. The bifactor model of the RRS-ED provided the best fit, demonstrating a reliable general rumination factor. Also, the bifactor model of the RRS-ED was invariant across sex. RRS-ED showed moderate to strong correlations with negative perseverative thinking and eating psychopathology. Both domain-specific factors of RRS-ED were associated with higher levels of eating psychopathology. Findings indicate that RRS-ED is a reliable and valid measure to assess the ruminative response from the general population in Portugal, showing initial evidence that supports the use of a total score of RRS-ED as an overall measure of rumination, while specific factor scores should be reported with caution. Future studies are needed to replicate the findings and further corroborate the unidimensionality of the RRS-ED.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"60-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2023.2259676\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2023.2259676","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进食障碍反刍反应量表(RRS-ED)测量与进食障碍主题特别相关的反刍思维内容,评估反刍、沉思和反思两个领域。本研究旨在使用相关的双因子模型,即单因子和双因子模型来检验葡萄牙社区样本中RRS-ED的因子结构,并测试跨性别的不变性。535名成年人(179名男性;356名女性)的样本填写了RRS-ED。一个子样本(n=347)回答了重复消极思维和饮食精神病理学的额外测量。RRS-ED的双因子模型提供了最佳拟合,证明了一个可靠的一般沉思因子。此外,RRS-ED的双因子模型在不同性别之间是不变的。RRS-ED与消极坚持性思维和饮食精神病理学表现出中等至强烈的相关性。RRS-ED的两个领域特异性因素都与较高水平的饮食精神病理学有关。研究结果表明,RRS-ED是评估葡萄牙普通人群反刍反应的可靠有效指标,初步证据支持使用RRS-ED总分作为反刍的总体指标,同时应谨慎报告特定因素得分。未来的研究需要复制这些发现,并进一步证实RRS-ED的单一性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ruminative response scale for eating disorders: bifactor model and measurement invariance in a Portuguese community sample.

The Ruminative Response Scale for Eating Disorders (RRS-ED) measures ruminative thought content specifically related to eating disordered themes, assessing two domains of rumination, brooding and reflection. This study aims to examine the factor structure of the RRS-ED in a Portuguese community sample, using correlated two-factor models, unifactorial and bifactor models and test for invariance across sex. A sample of 535 adults (179 male; 356 female) filled out the RRS-ED. A subsample (n=347) answered additional measures of repetitive negative thinking and eating psychopathology. The bifactor model of the RRS-ED provided the best fit, demonstrating a reliable general rumination factor. Also, the bifactor model of the RRS-ED was invariant across sex. RRS-ED showed moderate to strong correlations with negative perseverative thinking and eating psychopathology. Both domain-specific factors of RRS-ED were associated with higher levels of eating psychopathology. Findings indicate that RRS-ED is a reliable and valid measure to assess the ruminative response from the general population in Portugal, showing initial evidence that supports the use of a total score of RRS-ED as an overall measure of rumination, while specific factor scores should be reported with caution. Future studies are needed to replicate the findings and further corroborate the unidimensionality of the RRS-ED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders PSYCHIATRY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Eating Disorders is contemporary and wide ranging, and takes a fundamentally practical, humanistic, compassionate view of clients and their presenting problems. You’ll find a multidisciplinary perspective on clinical issues and prevention research that considers the essential cultural, social, familial, and personal elements that not only foster eating-related problems, but also furnish clues that facilitate the most effective possible therapies and treatment approaches.
期刊最新文献
Peer mentors' experiences of delivering peer support for individuals with eating disorders: giving back and supporting processes of change. Absolute and relative outcomes of cognitive behavior therapy for eating disorders in adults: a meta-analysis. Differential effects of community involvement on eating disorder prevention outcomes in sexual minority men. Developing a justice-focused body image program for U.S. middle schoolers: a school-based community-engaged research process. The need for more inclusive measurement to advance equity in eating disorders prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1