饮食失调的反刍反应量表:葡萄牙社区样本中的双因子模型和测量不变性。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2024-01-02 Epub Date: 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1080/10640266.2023.2259676
Cristiana C Marques, Paula Castilho, Ana Telma Pereira, Kenneth Goss, Miguel Castelo-Branco, António Macedo
{"title":"饮食失调的反刍反应量表:葡萄牙社区样本中的双因子模型和测量不变性。","authors":"Cristiana C Marques, Paula Castilho, Ana Telma Pereira, Kenneth Goss, Miguel Castelo-Branco, António Macedo","doi":"10.1080/10640266.2023.2259676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Ruminative Response Scale for Eating Disorders (RRS-ED) measures ruminative thought content specifically related to eating disordered themes, assessing two domains of rumination, brooding and reflection. This study aims to examine the factor structure of the RRS-ED in a Portuguese community sample, using correlated two-factor models, unifactorial and bifactor models and test for invariance across sex. A sample of 535 adults (179 male; 356 female) filled out the RRS-ED. A subsample (<i>n</i>=347) answered additional measures of repetitive negative thinking and eating psychopathology. The bifactor model of the RRS-ED provided the best fit, demonstrating a reliable general rumination factor. Also, the bifactor model of the RRS-ED was invariant across sex. RRS-ED showed moderate to strong correlations with negative perseverative thinking and eating psychopathology. Both domain-specific factors of RRS-ED were associated with higher levels of eating psychopathology. Findings indicate that RRS-ED is a reliable and valid measure to assess the ruminative response from the general population in Portugal, showing initial evidence that supports the use of a total score of RRS-ED as an overall measure of rumination, while specific factor scores should be reported with caution. Future studies are needed to replicate the findings and further corroborate the unidimensionality of the RRS-ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":48835,"journal":{"name":"Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"60-80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ruminative response scale for eating disorders: bifactor model and measurement invariance in a Portuguese community sample.\",\"authors\":\"Cristiana C Marques, Paula Castilho, Ana Telma Pereira, Kenneth Goss, Miguel Castelo-Branco, António Macedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10640266.2023.2259676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Ruminative Response Scale for Eating Disorders (RRS-ED) measures ruminative thought content specifically related to eating disordered themes, assessing two domains of rumination, brooding and reflection. This study aims to examine the factor structure of the RRS-ED in a Portuguese community sample, using correlated two-factor models, unifactorial and bifactor models and test for invariance across sex. A sample of 535 adults (179 male; 356 female) filled out the RRS-ED. A subsample (<i>n</i>=347) answered additional measures of repetitive negative thinking and eating psychopathology. The bifactor model of the RRS-ED provided the best fit, demonstrating a reliable general rumination factor. Also, the bifactor model of the RRS-ED was invariant across sex. RRS-ED showed moderate to strong correlations with negative perseverative thinking and eating psychopathology. Both domain-specific factors of RRS-ED were associated with higher levels of eating psychopathology. Findings indicate that RRS-ED is a reliable and valid measure to assess the ruminative response from the general population in Portugal, showing initial evidence that supports the use of a total score of RRS-ED as an overall measure of rumination, while specific factor scores should be reported with caution. Future studies are needed to replicate the findings and further corroborate the unidimensionality of the RRS-ED.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"60-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2023.2259676\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2023.2259676","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进食障碍反刍反应量表(RRS-ED)测量与进食障碍主题特别相关的反刍思维内容,评估反刍、沉思和反思两个领域。本研究旨在使用相关的双因子模型,即单因子和双因子模型来检验葡萄牙社区样本中RRS-ED的因子结构,并测试跨性别的不变性。535名成年人(179名男性;356名女性)的样本填写了RRS-ED。一个子样本(n=347)回答了重复消极思维和饮食精神病理学的额外测量。RRS-ED的双因子模型提供了最佳拟合,证明了一个可靠的一般沉思因子。此外,RRS-ED的双因子模型在不同性别之间是不变的。RRS-ED与消极坚持性思维和饮食精神病理学表现出中等至强烈的相关性。RRS-ED的两个领域特异性因素都与较高水平的饮食精神病理学有关。研究结果表明,RRS-ED是评估葡萄牙普通人群反刍反应的可靠有效指标,初步证据支持使用RRS-ED总分作为反刍的总体指标,同时应谨慎报告特定因素得分。未来的研究需要复制这些发现,并进一步证实RRS-ED的单一性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ruminative response scale for eating disorders: bifactor model and measurement invariance in a Portuguese community sample.

The Ruminative Response Scale for Eating Disorders (RRS-ED) measures ruminative thought content specifically related to eating disordered themes, assessing two domains of rumination, brooding and reflection. This study aims to examine the factor structure of the RRS-ED in a Portuguese community sample, using correlated two-factor models, unifactorial and bifactor models and test for invariance across sex. A sample of 535 adults (179 male; 356 female) filled out the RRS-ED. A subsample (n=347) answered additional measures of repetitive negative thinking and eating psychopathology. The bifactor model of the RRS-ED provided the best fit, demonstrating a reliable general rumination factor. Also, the bifactor model of the RRS-ED was invariant across sex. RRS-ED showed moderate to strong correlations with negative perseverative thinking and eating psychopathology. Both domain-specific factors of RRS-ED were associated with higher levels of eating psychopathology. Findings indicate that RRS-ED is a reliable and valid measure to assess the ruminative response from the general population in Portugal, showing initial evidence that supports the use of a total score of RRS-ED as an overall measure of rumination, while specific factor scores should be reported with caution. Future studies are needed to replicate the findings and further corroborate the unidimensionality of the RRS-ED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders PSYCHIATRY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Eating Disorders is contemporary and wide ranging, and takes a fundamentally practical, humanistic, compassionate view of clients and their presenting problems. You’ll find a multidisciplinary perspective on clinical issues and prevention research that considers the essential cultural, social, familial, and personal elements that not only foster eating-related problems, but also furnish clues that facilitate the most effective possible therapies and treatment approaches.
期刊最新文献
The impact of patient weight on US mental health providers' diagnosis of bulimia nervosa. The impact of incorporating an eating disorder screening tool and an eating disorder diagnostic workshop in outpatient general psychiatry settings in publicly insured populations: a case series. Level of family involvement as a predictor of outcome in eating disorder patients with and without provisional PTSD during residential treatment. An evaluation of lived experience email peer support for young people with eating disorders. Eating disorder treatment experiences among racially/ethnically minoritized samples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1