Daniel Bar-David;Laura Bar-David;Yinon Shapira;Rina Leibu;Dalia Dori;Aseel Gebara;Ronit Schneor;Anath Fischer;Shiri Soudry
{"title":"用于深度学习模型训练的糖尿病黄斑水肿光学相干断层扫描图像的弹性变形:还有多远?","authors":"Daniel Bar-David;Laura Bar-David;Yinon Shapira;Rina Leibu;Dalia Dori;Aseel Gebara;Ronit Schneor;Anath Fischer;Shiri Soudry","doi":"10.1109/JTEHM.2023.3294904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"– Objective: To explore the clinical validity of elastic deformation of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images for data augmentation in the development of deep-learning model for detection of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Prospective evaluation of OCT images of DME (n = 320) subject to elastic transformation, with the deformation intensity represented by (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\sigma$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n). Three sets of images, each comprising 100 pairs of scans (100 original & 100 modified), were grouped according to the range of (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\sigma$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n), including low-, medium- and high-degree of augmentation; (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\sigma $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n = 1-6), (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\sigma $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n = 7-12), and (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\sigma $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n = 13-18), respectively. Three retina specialists evaluated all datasets in a blinded manner and designated each image as ’original‘ versus ’modified‘. The rate of assignment of ’original‘ value to modified images (false-negative) was determined for each grader in each dataset. Results: The false-negative rates ranged between 71-77% for the low-, 63-76% for the medium-, and 50-75% for the high-augmentation categories. The corresponding rates of correct identification of original images ranged between 75-85% (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\text{p}>$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n0.05) in the low-, 73-85% (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\text{p}>$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n0.05 for graders 1 & 2, p = 0.01 for grader 3) in the medium-, and 81-91% (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\text{p} < 0.005$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n) in the high-augmentation categories. In the subcategory (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\sigma $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n = 7-9) the false-negative rates were 93-83%, whereas the rates of correctly identifying original images ranged between 89-99% (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\text{p}>$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n0.05 for all graders). Conclusions: Deformation of low-medium intensity (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\sigma $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n = 1-9) may be applied without compromising OCT image representativeness in DME. Clinical and Translational Impact Statement—Elastic deformation may efficiently augment the size, robustness, and diversity of training datasets without altering their clinical value, enhancing the development of high-accuracy algorithms for automated interpretation of OCT images.","PeriodicalId":54255,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine-Jtehm","volume":"11 ","pages":"487-494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/b0/jtehm-bardavid-3294904.PMC10561735.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elastic Deformation of Optical Coherence Tomography Images of Diabetic Macular Edema for Deep-Learning Models Training: How Far to Go?\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Bar-David;Laura Bar-David;Yinon Shapira;Rina Leibu;Dalia Dori;Aseel Gebara;Ronit Schneor;Anath Fischer;Shiri Soudry\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JTEHM.2023.3294904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"– Objective: To explore the clinical validity of elastic deformation of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images for data augmentation in the development of deep-learning model for detection of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Prospective evaluation of OCT images of DME (n = 320) subject to elastic transformation, with the deformation intensity represented by (\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\sigma$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n). Three sets of images, each comprising 100 pairs of scans (100 original & 100 modified), were grouped according to the range of (\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\sigma$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n), including low-, medium- and high-degree of augmentation; (\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\sigma $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n = 1-6), (\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\sigma $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n = 7-12), and (\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\sigma $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n = 13-18), respectively. Three retina specialists evaluated all datasets in a blinded manner and designated each image as ’original‘ versus ’modified‘. The rate of assignment of ’original‘ value to modified images (false-negative) was determined for each grader in each dataset. Results: The false-negative rates ranged between 71-77% for the low-, 63-76% for the medium-, and 50-75% for the high-augmentation categories. The corresponding rates of correct identification of original images ranged between 75-85% (\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\text{p}>$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n0.05) in the low-, 73-85% (\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\text{p}>$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n0.05 for graders 1 & 2, p = 0.01 for grader 3) in the medium-, and 81-91% (\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\text{p} < 0.005$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n) in the high-augmentation categories. In the subcategory (\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\sigma $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n = 7-9) the false-negative rates were 93-83%, whereas the rates of correctly identifying original images ranged between 89-99% (\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\text{p}>$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n0.05 for all graders). Conclusions: Deformation of low-medium intensity (\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\sigma $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n = 1-9) may be applied without compromising OCT image representativeness in DME. Clinical and Translational Impact Statement—Elastic deformation may efficiently augment the size, robustness, and diversity of training datasets without altering their clinical value, enhancing the development of high-accuracy algorithms for automated interpretation of OCT images.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine-Jtehm\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"487-494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/b0/jtehm-bardavid-3294904.PMC10561735.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine-Jtehm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10192390/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine-Jtehm","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10192390/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Elastic Deformation of Optical Coherence Tomography Images of Diabetic Macular Edema for Deep-Learning Models Training: How Far to Go?
– Objective: To explore the clinical validity of elastic deformation of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images for data augmentation in the development of deep-learning model for detection of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Prospective evaluation of OCT images of DME (n = 320) subject to elastic transformation, with the deformation intensity represented by (
$\sigma$
). Three sets of images, each comprising 100 pairs of scans (100 original & 100 modified), were grouped according to the range of (
$\sigma$
), including low-, medium- and high-degree of augmentation; (
$\sigma $
= 1-6), (
$\sigma $
= 7-12), and (
$\sigma $
= 13-18), respectively. Three retina specialists evaluated all datasets in a blinded manner and designated each image as ’original‘ versus ’modified‘. The rate of assignment of ’original‘ value to modified images (false-negative) was determined for each grader in each dataset. Results: The false-negative rates ranged between 71-77% for the low-, 63-76% for the medium-, and 50-75% for the high-augmentation categories. The corresponding rates of correct identification of original images ranged between 75-85% (
$\text{p}>$
0.05) in the low-, 73-85% (
$\text{p}>$
0.05 for graders 1 & 2, p = 0.01 for grader 3) in the medium-, and 81-91% (
$\text{p} < 0.005$
) in the high-augmentation categories. In the subcategory (
$\sigma $
= 7-9) the false-negative rates were 93-83%, whereas the rates of correctly identifying original images ranged between 89-99% (
$\text{p}>$
0.05 for all graders). Conclusions: Deformation of low-medium intensity (
$\sigma $
= 1-9) may be applied without compromising OCT image representativeness in DME. Clinical and Translational Impact Statement—Elastic deformation may efficiently augment the size, robustness, and diversity of training datasets without altering their clinical value, enhancing the development of high-accuracy algorithms for automated interpretation of OCT images.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine is an open access product that bridges the engineering and clinical worlds, focusing on detailed descriptions of advanced technical solutions to a clinical need along with clinical results and healthcare relevance. The journal provides a platform for state-of-the-art technology directions in the interdisciplinary field of biomedical engineering, embracing engineering, life sciences and medicine. A unique aspect of the journal is its ability to foster a collaboration between physicians and engineers for presenting broad and compelling real world technological and engineering solutions that can be implemented in the interest of improving quality of patient care and treatment outcomes, thereby reducing costs and improving efficiency. The journal provides an active forum for clinical research and relevant state-of the-art technology for members of all the IEEE societies that have an interest in biomedical engineering as well as reaching out directly to physicians and the medical community through the American Medical Association (AMA) and other clinical societies. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited, to topics on: Medical devices, healthcare delivery systems, global healthcare initiatives, and ICT based services; Technological relevance to healthcare cost reduction; Technology affecting healthcare management, decision-making, and policy; Advanced technical work that is applied to solving specific clinical needs.