世界尽头的疯人院:比利时人进入南极黑夜的旅程

IF 0.8 Q2 AREA STUDIES Polar Journal Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/2154896x.2021.1978995
A. Jackson
{"title":"世界尽头的疯人院:比利时人进入南极黑夜的旅程","authors":"A. Jackson","doi":"10.1080/2154896x.2021.1978995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"specific northern nations shifted their Arctic policies from the highly-militarised posture of the Cold War to encompass softer security threats in the 21st century. Russia, for example, adjusted the mandate of the Border Guard Service to include monitoring and control of fluvial sites along the northern sea route, a dynamic Alexander Sergunin outlines in his chapter on Russian Arctic realities (chapter 6). Wilfrid Greaves, P. Whitney Lackenbauer, and Andreas Osthagen addressed evolving strategic doctrines in other Arctic nations, reinforcing one of the volume’s central themes that ‘we must stop thinking of the Arctic as a single holistic place’ to understand unique national priorities (p. 13). The chapters on emerging threats (chapters 9–12) move beyond realist conceptions of security, but remain couched in the language of sovereign protection, with chapters from Petra Dolata, Gunhild Hoogensen Gjorv, Natalia Loukacheva, and Frank Sejersen. Hoogensen Gjorv argues in chapter 10 that ‘at its core, human security is concerned about how people themselves experience security and insecurity,’ [emphasis in original] (p. 206) underscoring the editors’ point that perceptions of security and sovereignty are neither fixed nor absolute. Indigenous sovereignty and security, for example, is bound up in the ability to access foods central to traditional diets and cope with effects of climate change, an idea explored in greater depth by Loukacheva in chapter 11. Although Mathieu Landriault’s media analysis of Canadian Arctic security crises (chapter 3) and P. Whitney Lackenbauer’s assessment of Canadian Arctic policies (chapter 7) read more like standalone articles than part of a cohesive edited volume, the overall thematic coherence of the book makes for a publication that is useful for Arctic students and scholars of all levels. The editors of and contributors to Breaking Through created an essential handbook for understanding security and sovereignty above the Arctic Circle. Having explored these issues from numerous angles throughout the volume, editor Wilfrid Greaves concludes with a reminder that conventional concerns of Arctic militarisation, emerging threats from global warming, and the historic political marginalisation of Indigenous groups are intrinsically bound together in shaping future challenges to Arctic sovereignty and security. Although these individual threats have typically been siloed into distinct academic or policy discussions, the contributors to this multidisciplinary volume remind readers that such divisions no longer match the Arctic’s political reality.","PeriodicalId":52117,"journal":{"name":"Polar Journal","volume":"257 1","pages":"477 - 479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Madhouse at the end of the world: the Belgica’s journey into the dark Antarctic night\",\"authors\":\"A. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2154896x.2021.1978995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"specific northern nations shifted their Arctic policies from the highly-militarised posture of the Cold War to encompass softer security threats in the 21st century. Russia, for example, adjusted the mandate of the Border Guard Service to include monitoring and control of fluvial sites along the northern sea route, a dynamic Alexander Sergunin outlines in his chapter on Russian Arctic realities (chapter 6). Wilfrid Greaves, P. Whitney Lackenbauer, and Andreas Osthagen addressed evolving strategic doctrines in other Arctic nations, reinforcing one of the volume’s central themes that ‘we must stop thinking of the Arctic as a single holistic place’ to understand unique national priorities (p. 13). The chapters on emerging threats (chapters 9–12) move beyond realist conceptions of security, but remain couched in the language of sovereign protection, with chapters from Petra Dolata, Gunhild Hoogensen Gjorv, Natalia Loukacheva, and Frank Sejersen. Hoogensen Gjorv argues in chapter 10 that ‘at its core, human security is concerned about how people themselves experience security and insecurity,’ [emphasis in original] (p. 206) underscoring the editors’ point that perceptions of security and sovereignty are neither fixed nor absolute. Indigenous sovereignty and security, for example, is bound up in the ability to access foods central to traditional diets and cope with effects of climate change, an idea explored in greater depth by Loukacheva in chapter 11. Although Mathieu Landriault’s media analysis of Canadian Arctic security crises (chapter 3) and P. Whitney Lackenbauer’s assessment of Canadian Arctic policies (chapter 7) read more like standalone articles than part of a cohesive edited volume, the overall thematic coherence of the book makes for a publication that is useful for Arctic students and scholars of all levels. The editors of and contributors to Breaking Through created an essential handbook for understanding security and sovereignty above the Arctic Circle. Having explored these issues from numerous angles throughout the volume, editor Wilfrid Greaves concludes with a reminder that conventional concerns of Arctic militarisation, emerging threats from global warming, and the historic political marginalisation of Indigenous groups are intrinsically bound together in shaping future challenges to Arctic sovereignty and security. Although these individual threats have typically been siloed into distinct academic or policy discussions, the contributors to this multidisciplinary volume remind readers that such divisions no longer match the Arctic’s political reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polar Journal\",\"volume\":\"257 1\",\"pages\":\"477 - 479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polar Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896x.2021.1978995\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896x.2021.1978995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特定的北方国家在21世纪将其北极政策从冷战时期的高度军事化姿态转变为更温和的安全威胁。例如,俄罗斯调整了边防部队的任务,将监测和控制北部海路沿线的河流遗址纳入其中,亚历山大·塞尔古宁在其关于俄罗斯北极现实的章节(第6章)中概述了这一动态。Wilfrid Greaves、P.Whitney Lackenbauer和Andreas Osthagen讨论了其他北极国家不断演变的战略学说,强化了该卷的一个中心主题,即“我们必须停止将北极视为一个单一的整体”,以理解独特的国家优先事项(第13页)。关于新出现的威胁的章节(第9-12章)超越了现实主义的安全概念,但仍以主权保护的语言表达,其中包括佩特拉·多拉塔、贡希尔德·胡根森·格约夫、纳塔利娅·卢卡切娃和弗兰克·塞杰森的章节。Hoogensen Gjorv在第10章中认为,“人类安全的核心是人们自己如何体验安全和不安全”,[原文强调](第206页)强调了编辑们的观点,即对安全和主权的看法既不是固定的,也不是绝对的。例如,土著人的主权和安全与获得传统饮食的核心食物和应对气候变化影响的能力息息相关,Loukacheva在第11章中对这一想法进行了更深入的探讨。尽管Mathieu Landriault对加拿大北极安全危机的媒体分析(第3章)和P.Whitney Lackenbauer对加拿大北极政策的评估(第7章)读起来更像是独立的文章,而不是有凝聚力的编辑卷的一部分,但这本书的整体主题连贯性使其成为一本对北极各级学生和学者有用的出版物。《突破》的编辑和撰稿人为理解北极圈上空的安全和主权编写了一本重要手册。编辑Wilfrid Greaves在整本书中从多个角度探讨了这些问题,最后提醒我们,对北极军事化的传统担忧、全球变暖带来的新威胁以及土著群体的历史性政治边缘化,在塑造未来对北极主权和安全的挑战时,有着内在的联系。尽管这些单独的威胁通常被孤立在不同的学术或政策讨论中,但这本多学科著作的作者提醒读者,这种分歧不再符合北极的政治现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Madhouse at the end of the world: the Belgica’s journey into the dark Antarctic night
specific northern nations shifted their Arctic policies from the highly-militarised posture of the Cold War to encompass softer security threats in the 21st century. Russia, for example, adjusted the mandate of the Border Guard Service to include monitoring and control of fluvial sites along the northern sea route, a dynamic Alexander Sergunin outlines in his chapter on Russian Arctic realities (chapter 6). Wilfrid Greaves, P. Whitney Lackenbauer, and Andreas Osthagen addressed evolving strategic doctrines in other Arctic nations, reinforcing one of the volume’s central themes that ‘we must stop thinking of the Arctic as a single holistic place’ to understand unique national priorities (p. 13). The chapters on emerging threats (chapters 9–12) move beyond realist conceptions of security, but remain couched in the language of sovereign protection, with chapters from Petra Dolata, Gunhild Hoogensen Gjorv, Natalia Loukacheva, and Frank Sejersen. Hoogensen Gjorv argues in chapter 10 that ‘at its core, human security is concerned about how people themselves experience security and insecurity,’ [emphasis in original] (p. 206) underscoring the editors’ point that perceptions of security and sovereignty are neither fixed nor absolute. Indigenous sovereignty and security, for example, is bound up in the ability to access foods central to traditional diets and cope with effects of climate change, an idea explored in greater depth by Loukacheva in chapter 11. Although Mathieu Landriault’s media analysis of Canadian Arctic security crises (chapter 3) and P. Whitney Lackenbauer’s assessment of Canadian Arctic policies (chapter 7) read more like standalone articles than part of a cohesive edited volume, the overall thematic coherence of the book makes for a publication that is useful for Arctic students and scholars of all levels. The editors of and contributors to Breaking Through created an essential handbook for understanding security and sovereignty above the Arctic Circle. Having explored these issues from numerous angles throughout the volume, editor Wilfrid Greaves concludes with a reminder that conventional concerns of Arctic militarisation, emerging threats from global warming, and the historic political marginalisation of Indigenous groups are intrinsically bound together in shaping future challenges to Arctic sovereignty and security. Although these individual threats have typically been siloed into distinct academic or policy discussions, the contributors to this multidisciplinary volume remind readers that such divisions no longer match the Arctic’s political reality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polar Journal
Polar Journal Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Antarctica and the Arctic are of crucial importance to global security. Their governance and the patterns of human interactions there are increasingly contentious; mining, tourism, bioprospecting, and fishing are but a few of the many issues of contention, while environmental concerns such as melting ice sheets have a global impact. The Polar Journal is a forum for the scholarly discussion of polar issues from a social science and humanities perspective and brings together the considerable number of specialists and policy makers working on these crucial regions across multiple disciplines. The journal welcomes papers on polar affairs from all fields of the social sciences and the humanities and is especially interested in publishing policy-relevant research. Each issue of the journal either features articles from different disciplines on polar affairs or is a topical theme from a range of scholarly approaches. Topics include: • Polar governance and policy • Polar history, heritage, and culture • Polar economics • Polar politics • Music, art, and literature of the polar regions • Polar tourism • Polar geography and geopolitics • Polar psychology • Polar archaeology Manuscript types accepted: • Regular articles • Research reports • Opinion pieces • Book Reviews • Conference Reports.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on the economic and political history of the Ross Sea Globalised imaginaries, Arctification and resistance in Arctic tourism – an Arctification perspective on tourism actors’ views on seasonality and growth in Ylläs tourism destination Experiencing Svalbard sustainably? Reflecting on what we can learn about polar cruise tourism from the SEES expedition The Antarctic Peninsula: Argentina and Chile in the era of global change Committing to the Antarctic: values, ecological beliefs, and social identity in national perception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1