日常情绪调节手机应用质量评价:基于手机应用评定量表的回顾与分析

S. An, Hannah Lee
{"title":"日常情绪调节手机应用质量评价:基于手机应用评定量表的回顾与分析","authors":"S. An, Hannah Lee","doi":"10.7739/jkafn.2022.30.2.180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of mobile application (app) for mood management and to assess the quality of these application using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).Methods: The Google Play store was thoroughly explored in order to find apps that could help regulate daily moods. A total of 28 apps were selected. These mobile apps were analyzed with MARS questionnaires, which includes a total of 23 evaluation criteria organized into 6 categories (Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, Information, Subjective Quality, and App specific). In addition, we examined the features contained in of 28 different apps, focusing on those that measured mood and provided coping strategies.Results: The mean MARS score for the overall quality of the 28 apps was 3.48±0.81, with a maximum of 5 and a minimum of 0. Most apps received acceptable grades for Engagement and Aesthetics.Conclusion: MARS is a useful strategy for determining which apps can be recommended to users and which features should be modify to improve the quality of apps. This review shows that some apps match predetermined criteria for quality, content, or functionality, underlining the need for additional refining to evidence-based principles.","PeriodicalId":53419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Evaluation of Mobile Application for Daily Mood Regulation: A Review and Analysis using the Mobile Application Rating Scale\",\"authors\":\"S. An, Hannah Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.7739/jkafn.2022.30.2.180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of mobile application (app) for mood management and to assess the quality of these application using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).Methods: The Google Play store was thoroughly explored in order to find apps that could help regulate daily moods. A total of 28 apps were selected. These mobile apps were analyzed with MARS questionnaires, which includes a total of 23 evaluation criteria organized into 6 categories (Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, Information, Subjective Quality, and App specific). In addition, we examined the features contained in of 28 different apps, focusing on those that measured mood and provided coping strategies.Results: The mean MARS score for the overall quality of the 28 apps was 3.48±0.81, with a maximum of 5 and a minimum of 0. Most apps received acceptable grades for Engagement and Aesthetics.Conclusion: MARS is a useful strategy for determining which apps can be recommended to users and which features should be modify to improve the quality of apps. This review shows that some apps match predetermined criteria for quality, content, or functionality, underlining the need for additional refining to evidence-based principles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2022.30.2.180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2022.30.2.180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是概述用于情绪管理的移动应用程序,并使用移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)评估这些应用程序的质量。方法:深入研究Google Play商店,以找到有助于调节日常情绪的应用程序。共选择了28个应用程序。这些移动应用程序使用MARS问卷进行了分析,其中包括23项评估标准,分为6类(参与度、功能性、美学、信息、主观质量和应用程序特定)。此外,我们还研究了28款不同应用程序中包含的功能,重点关注那些测量情绪并提供应对策略的应用程序。结果:28个应用程序的总体质量的平均MARS评分为3.48±0.81,最大值为5,最小值为0。大多数应用程序在参与度和美学方面都获得了可接受的分数。结论:MARS是一种有用的策略,可以确定哪些应用程序可以推荐给用户,哪些功能应该修改以提高应用程序的质量。这篇综述表明,一些应用程序在质量、内容或功能方面符合预先确定的标准,强调了对循证原则进行进一步完善的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality Evaluation of Mobile Application for Daily Mood Regulation: A Review and Analysis using the Mobile Application Rating Scale
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of mobile application (app) for mood management and to assess the quality of these application using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).Methods: The Google Play store was thoroughly explored in order to find apps that could help regulate daily moods. A total of 28 apps were selected. These mobile apps were analyzed with MARS questionnaires, which includes a total of 23 evaluation criteria organized into 6 categories (Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, Information, Subjective Quality, and App specific). In addition, we examined the features contained in of 28 different apps, focusing on those that measured mood and provided coping strategies.Results: The mean MARS score for the overall quality of the 28 apps was 3.48±0.81, with a maximum of 5 and a minimum of 0. Most apps received acceptable grades for Engagement and Aesthetics.Conclusion: MARS is a useful strategy for determining which apps can be recommended to users and which features should be modify to improve the quality of apps. This review shows that some apps match predetermined criteria for quality, content, or functionality, underlining the need for additional refining to evidence-based principles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Development of Pressure Ulcer Management and Fall Prevention Protocol Development of a Drainage Tube (Jackson-Pratt Drain or Hemovac) Management Protocol Factors Influencing Nurses’ Job Performance in Korea and Mongolia: A Cross-Sectional Study Validation of the Electronic Compassion Competence Scale: Paper-and-Pencil versus Web-Based Questionnaires The Impact of Symptom Burden, Social Support, Self-Efficacy, and eHealth Literacy on the Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1