评估第二语言葡萄牙语写作:思想密度和句子复杂性

Signo Pub Date : 2022-01-03 DOI:10.17058/signo.v47i88.17384
Ângela Filipe Lopes, M. Pinto
{"title":"评估第二语言葡萄牙语写作:思想密度和句子复杂性","authors":"Ângela Filipe Lopes, M. Pinto","doi":"10.17058/signo.v47i88.17384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Idea density and grammatical complexity were proposed as writing assessment parameters by Snowdon et al. (1996) and by Kemper et al. (2001) in the Nun Study (Snowdon 2001). The same parameters are used here to assess advanced Portuguese L2 writing in a learning context (C1/C2) in order to confirm them as valid assessment measures in a L2. Quality in writing is expected to translate into lexical precision and richness as well as sentence complexity. Results confirmed that reading has an influence on writing quality, insofar as the students who usually read are the ones who got the highest scores in both parameters. Results were nevertheless highly variable due to the heterogeneity of the group of participants. Both measures, idea density and grammatical complexity, were found to be correlated in two writing tasks, a synthesis and a writing prompt, which led to the conclusion that participants who write with lexical precision and richness also produce higher complexity sentences regardless of language and writing task variability.\n \nKeywords: idea density; grammatical complexity; assessing writing; Portuguese L2.\n \nKeywords: dyslexia; educational measurement; learning disabilities; validation study; psychometrics.","PeriodicalId":30243,"journal":{"name":"Signo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing L2 Portuguese writing: idea density and sentence complexity\",\"authors\":\"Ângela Filipe Lopes, M. Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.17058/signo.v47i88.17384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Idea density and grammatical complexity were proposed as writing assessment parameters by Snowdon et al. (1996) and by Kemper et al. (2001) in the Nun Study (Snowdon 2001). The same parameters are used here to assess advanced Portuguese L2 writing in a learning context (C1/C2) in order to confirm them as valid assessment measures in a L2. Quality in writing is expected to translate into lexical precision and richness as well as sentence complexity. Results confirmed that reading has an influence on writing quality, insofar as the students who usually read are the ones who got the highest scores in both parameters. Results were nevertheless highly variable due to the heterogeneity of the group of participants. Both measures, idea density and grammatical complexity, were found to be correlated in two writing tasks, a synthesis and a writing prompt, which led to the conclusion that participants who write with lexical precision and richness also produce higher complexity sentences regardless of language and writing task variability.\\n \\nKeywords: idea density; grammatical complexity; assessing writing; Portuguese L2.\\n \\nKeywords: dyslexia; educational measurement; learning disabilities; validation study; psychometrics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Signo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Signo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v47i88.17384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v47i88.17384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:Snowdon等人(1996)和Kemper等人(2001)在Nun Study(Snowdon,2001)中提出了概念密度和语法复杂性作为写作评估参数。这里使用相同的参数来评估学习环境中的高级葡萄牙语二语写作(C1/C2),以确认它们是二语中的有效评估措施。写作的质量被期望转化为词汇的准确性和丰富性以及句子的复杂性。研究结果证实,阅读对写作质量有影响,因为通常阅读的学生在这两个参数中得分最高。然而,由于参与者群体的异质性,结果变化很大。研究发现,在合成和写作提示这两项写作任务中,概念密度和语法复杂性这两个指标都是相关的,这导致了这样一个结论:无论语言和写作任务的可变性如何,词汇精确和丰富的参与者也会产生更高复杂性的句子。关键词:思想密度;语法复杂性;写作评估;葡萄牙语L2。关键词:阅读障碍;教育测量;学习障碍;验证研究;心理测量学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing L2 Portuguese writing: idea density and sentence complexity
Abstract: Idea density and grammatical complexity were proposed as writing assessment parameters by Snowdon et al. (1996) and by Kemper et al. (2001) in the Nun Study (Snowdon 2001). The same parameters are used here to assess advanced Portuguese L2 writing in a learning context (C1/C2) in order to confirm them as valid assessment measures in a L2. Quality in writing is expected to translate into lexical precision and richness as well as sentence complexity. Results confirmed that reading has an influence on writing quality, insofar as the students who usually read are the ones who got the highest scores in both parameters. Results were nevertheless highly variable due to the heterogeneity of the group of participants. Both measures, idea density and grammatical complexity, were found to be correlated in two writing tasks, a synthesis and a writing prompt, which led to the conclusion that participants who write with lexical precision and richness also produce higher complexity sentences regardless of language and writing task variability.   Keywords: idea density; grammatical complexity; assessing writing; Portuguese L2.   Keywords: dyslexia; educational measurement; learning disabilities; validation study; psychometrics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Resenha: How we read now Recursos educacionais abertos: gênero ou hipergênero? Orientações para a construção de materiais digitais focados na estimulação da compreensão leitora em pessoas idosas da comunidade Modos de ler, modos de sentir: midialidades sinestésicas Compreensão leitora em postagens de grupos de WhatsApp
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1