教师教育的创新伦理——访Anne Phelan

IF 1.4 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/1359866X.2021.2022095
Anne M. Phelan
{"title":"教师教育的创新伦理——访Anne Phelan","authors":"Anne M. Phelan","doi":"10.1080/1359866X.2021.2022095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the abiding challenges for teacher education is to create and sustain a sense of educational possibility. This means putting conditions in place that can help preserve the capacity of each new teacher to renew the educational conversation, that is, to question, to articulate what matters, and to imagine yet unthought educational purposes and practices. This means that teacher education programmes and policies not only welcome but nourish the difference that each newcomer brings to the profession. Put simply, the challenge is how to keep the question of a future open. This is a perennial educational challenge of course but one currently haunted by neo-liberal learning utopias, on the one hand, and pandemic dystopias, on the other. Utopian thought provides enticing visions of a better future. In its neo-liberal variety, the future is defined within the terms of global economics. Oriented towards uncontested and predetermined destinations, neo-liberalism offers a sort of user manual for living and teaching (Clarke & Phelan, 2017). It provides direction without inviting an articulation of meaningful purpose (Brown, 2017). This means that the need for ethical judgment or political consideration is erased because, we are told, there are no alternatives to consider. Dion Rüsselbæk Hansen and I have written about how the neo-liberal utopian ideal of a better economic future is entangled with education (Phelan & Rüsselbæk Hansen, 2021). Education becomes little more than “a ‘resource’ to be used as part of the standing reserve in the game of national economic competition” (Peters & Humes, 2003, p. 432). Teachers become the instrumental means to commercial ends and good teaching, directed towards predetermined effects – improvement of student test scores on international comparative tests (Hattie, 2013; McMahon, Forde, & Dickson, 2015) – is seen as merely “a clinical practice positioned within an audit culture” (Peters & Humes, 2003, p. 68). In this scenario, teacher education prepares teachers as:","PeriodicalId":47276,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ethics of innovation for teacher education: an interview with Anne Phelan\",\"authors\":\"Anne M. Phelan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1359866X.2021.2022095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the abiding challenges for teacher education is to create and sustain a sense of educational possibility. This means putting conditions in place that can help preserve the capacity of each new teacher to renew the educational conversation, that is, to question, to articulate what matters, and to imagine yet unthought educational purposes and practices. This means that teacher education programmes and policies not only welcome but nourish the difference that each newcomer brings to the profession. Put simply, the challenge is how to keep the question of a future open. This is a perennial educational challenge of course but one currently haunted by neo-liberal learning utopias, on the one hand, and pandemic dystopias, on the other. Utopian thought provides enticing visions of a better future. In its neo-liberal variety, the future is defined within the terms of global economics. Oriented towards uncontested and predetermined destinations, neo-liberalism offers a sort of user manual for living and teaching (Clarke & Phelan, 2017). It provides direction without inviting an articulation of meaningful purpose (Brown, 2017). This means that the need for ethical judgment or political consideration is erased because, we are told, there are no alternatives to consider. Dion Rüsselbæk Hansen and I have written about how the neo-liberal utopian ideal of a better economic future is entangled with education (Phelan & Rüsselbæk Hansen, 2021). Education becomes little more than “a ‘resource’ to be used as part of the standing reserve in the game of national economic competition” (Peters & Humes, 2003, p. 432). Teachers become the instrumental means to commercial ends and good teaching, directed towards predetermined effects – improvement of student test scores on international comparative tests (Hattie, 2013; McMahon, Forde, & Dickson, 2015) – is seen as merely “a clinical practice positioned within an audit culture” (Peters & Humes, 2003, p. 68). In this scenario, teacher education prepares teachers as:\",\"PeriodicalId\":47276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2021.2022095\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2021.2022095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教师教育面临的长期挑战之一是创造和维持一种教育可能性的意识。这意味着要创造条件,帮助每位新教师保持更新教育对话的能力,也就是说,提出问题,阐明什么是重要的,并想象尚未考虑的教育目的和实践。这意味着教师教育项目和政策不仅欢迎,而且会滋养每个新人给这个职业带来的差异。简而言之,挑战在于如何保持未来的开放性。当然,这是一个长期存在的教育挑战,但目前一方面是新自由主义的学习乌托邦,另一方面是流行的反乌托邦。乌托邦思想提供了美好未来的诱人愿景。在它的新自由主义变种中,未来是在全球经济的条件下定义的。面向无争议和预定的目的地,新自由主义为生活和教学提供了一种用户手册(Clarke & Phelan, 2017)。它提供了方向,而不需要表达有意义的目的(Brown, 2017)。这意味着对道德判断或政治考虑的需要被抹去了,因为我们被告知,没有其他选择可以考虑。Dion r sselbæk Hansen和我写过关于更好的经济未来的新自由主义乌托邦理想是如何与教育纠缠在一起的(Phelan & r sselbæk Hansen, 2021)。教育只不过是“一种‘资源’,在国家经济竞争的游戏中被用作常设储备的一部分”(彼得斯和休谟,2003年,第432页)。教师成为商业目的和良好教学的工具手段,指向预定的效果-提高学生在国际比较测试中的测试成绩(Hattie, 2013;McMahon, Forde, & Dickson, 2015) -被视为仅仅是“在审计文化中定位的临床实践”(Peters & Humes, 2003, p. 68)。在这种情况下,教师教育将教师培养为:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An ethics of innovation for teacher education: an interview with Anne Phelan
One of the abiding challenges for teacher education is to create and sustain a sense of educational possibility. This means putting conditions in place that can help preserve the capacity of each new teacher to renew the educational conversation, that is, to question, to articulate what matters, and to imagine yet unthought educational purposes and practices. This means that teacher education programmes and policies not only welcome but nourish the difference that each newcomer brings to the profession. Put simply, the challenge is how to keep the question of a future open. This is a perennial educational challenge of course but one currently haunted by neo-liberal learning utopias, on the one hand, and pandemic dystopias, on the other. Utopian thought provides enticing visions of a better future. In its neo-liberal variety, the future is defined within the terms of global economics. Oriented towards uncontested and predetermined destinations, neo-liberalism offers a sort of user manual for living and teaching (Clarke & Phelan, 2017). It provides direction without inviting an articulation of meaningful purpose (Brown, 2017). This means that the need for ethical judgment or political consideration is erased because, we are told, there are no alternatives to consider. Dion Rüsselbæk Hansen and I have written about how the neo-liberal utopian ideal of a better economic future is entangled with education (Phelan & Rüsselbæk Hansen, 2021). Education becomes little more than “a ‘resource’ to be used as part of the standing reserve in the game of national economic competition” (Peters & Humes, 2003, p. 432). Teachers become the instrumental means to commercial ends and good teaching, directed towards predetermined effects – improvement of student test scores on international comparative tests (Hattie, 2013; McMahon, Forde, & Dickson, 2015) – is seen as merely “a clinical practice positioned within an audit culture” (Peters & Humes, 2003, p. 68). In this scenario, teacher education prepares teachers as:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: This journal promotes rigorous research that makes a significant contribution to advancing knowledge in teacher education across early childhood, primary, secondary, vocational education and training, and higher education. The journal editors invite for peer review theoretically informed papers - including, but not limited to, empirically grounded research - which focus on significant issues relevant to an international audience in regards to: Teacher education (including initial teacher education and ongoing professional education) of teachers internationally; The cultural, economic, political, social and/or technological dimensions and contexts of teacher education; Change, stability, reform and resistance in (and relating to) teacher education; Improving the quality and impact of research in teacher education.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking expert teachers’ theory construction experiences: a case study Preschool educators’ use of commanding language in China and Japan: a cross-cultural comparative study Making teacher educators’ experiences visible: seeing inside the hopeful and ambiguous dimensions of practice Assessment of Chinese primary school mathematics teachers’ knowledge of students’ misconceptions regarding space and shape Enacting the signature pedagogies of arts education in the online learning environment for primary teacher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1