对癌症复发的恐惧、焦虑和担忧与健康行为和健康服务使用的关系:一项系统综述

Sarah C. Reed, Julie Berrett-Abebe, Robin L. Whitney, S. Sarkar, J. Bell
{"title":"对癌症复发的恐惧、焦虑和担忧与健康行为和健康服务使用的关系:一项系统综述","authors":"Sarah C. Reed, Julie Berrett-Abebe, Robin L. Whitney, S. Sarkar, J. Bell","doi":"10.1097/OR9.0000000000000064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: This systematic review was conducted to improve our understanding of the relationship between fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), anxiety and worry, and engagement in health behaviors and/or health service use. Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA methodology was performed to identify any publications that examined FCR, anxiety and worry, and health behaviors and/or health service use in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, and PsychINFO from January 1990 to April 2021. Quality was assessed using QualSyst, a standard quality assessment for evaluating primary research articles. Results: Seventy articles met the inclusion criteria, but the outcomes were too heterogeneous to combine in statistical meta-analysis. The measurement of FCR also varied widely and was inconsistent across studies. Among FCR specific measures, 36% used some version of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory. Prevention and detection of new and recurrent cancers accounted for 60% of all included studies, with the most frequently examined health behaviors being smoking status (17%) and physical activity (16%). Most associations indicated a significant relationship between FCR and current smoking, with those who are currently smoking experiencing higher levels of FCR. Relatively few studies explored the relationship between FCR and surveillance. Associations categorized under Interventions for Late Effects included a range of health services use with largely mixed results. Overall, studies had moderate to high quality. Conclusions: Given the measurement heterogeneity of FCR, future research would benefit from consistent operationalization and measurement. Some evidence suggests that FCR is associated with poor health behaviors. More studies are needed examining the relationship between FCR and surveillance. Research and clinical interventions may choose to focus on early post-treatment survivorship, given greater opportunities for support and intervention around FCR and other psychosocial concerns.","PeriodicalId":73915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships between fear of cancer recurrence, anxiety and worry, and health behaviors and health service use: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C. Reed, Julie Berrett-Abebe, Robin L. Whitney, S. Sarkar, J. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OR9.0000000000000064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: This systematic review was conducted to improve our understanding of the relationship between fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), anxiety and worry, and engagement in health behaviors and/or health service use. Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA methodology was performed to identify any publications that examined FCR, anxiety and worry, and health behaviors and/or health service use in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, and PsychINFO from January 1990 to April 2021. Quality was assessed using QualSyst, a standard quality assessment for evaluating primary research articles. Results: Seventy articles met the inclusion criteria, but the outcomes were too heterogeneous to combine in statistical meta-analysis. The measurement of FCR also varied widely and was inconsistent across studies. Among FCR specific measures, 36% used some version of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory. Prevention and detection of new and recurrent cancers accounted for 60% of all included studies, with the most frequently examined health behaviors being smoking status (17%) and physical activity (16%). Most associations indicated a significant relationship between FCR and current smoking, with those who are currently smoking experiencing higher levels of FCR. Relatively few studies explored the relationship between FCR and surveillance. Associations categorized under Interventions for Late Effects included a range of health services use with largely mixed results. Overall, studies had moderate to high quality. Conclusions: Given the measurement heterogeneity of FCR, future research would benefit from consistent operationalization and measurement. Some evidence suggests that FCR is associated with poor health behaviors. More studies are needed examining the relationship between FCR and surveillance. Research and clinical interventions may choose to focus on early post-treatment survivorship, given greater opportunities for support and intervention around FCR and other psychosocial concerns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OR9.0000000000000064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OR9.0000000000000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要背景:本系统综述旨在提高我们对癌症复发恐惧(FCR)、焦虑和担忧与健康行为和/或医疗服务使用之间关系的理解。方法:根据PRISMA方法进行系统审查,以确定1990年1月至2021年4月在以下数据库中检查FCR、焦虑和担忧、健康行为和/或医疗服务使用的任何出版物:PubMed、CINAHL和PsychINFO。质量评估使用QualSyst,一种用于评估主要研究文章的标准质量评估。结果:70篇文章符合纳入标准,但结果过于异质,无法在统计荟萃分析中进行组合。FCR的测量也有很大差异,并且在不同的研究中不一致。在针对FCR的测量中,36%的人使用了某种版本的癌症复发恐惧量表。新发和复发癌症的预防和检测占所有纳入研究的60%,最常见的健康行为是吸烟状态(17%)和体育活动(16%)。大多数关联表明FCR与当前吸烟之间存在显著关系,当前吸烟的人FCR水平较高。相对而言,很少有研究探讨FCR与监测之间的关系。根据晚期影响干预措施分类的协会包括一系列医疗服务的使用,结果基本上喜忧参半。总体而言,研究质量从中等到高。结论:鉴于FCR的测量异质性,未来的研究将受益于一致的操作和测量。一些证据表明FCR与不良健康行为有关。需要更多的研究来检验FCR和监测之间的关系。研究和临床干预可能会选择专注于治疗后的早期生存,因为有更多的机会围绕FCR和其他心理社会问题进行支持和干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationships between fear of cancer recurrence, anxiety and worry, and health behaviors and health service use: a systematic review
Abstract Background: This systematic review was conducted to improve our understanding of the relationship between fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), anxiety and worry, and engagement in health behaviors and/or health service use. Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA methodology was performed to identify any publications that examined FCR, anxiety and worry, and health behaviors and/or health service use in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, and PsychINFO from January 1990 to April 2021. Quality was assessed using QualSyst, a standard quality assessment for evaluating primary research articles. Results: Seventy articles met the inclusion criteria, but the outcomes were too heterogeneous to combine in statistical meta-analysis. The measurement of FCR also varied widely and was inconsistent across studies. Among FCR specific measures, 36% used some version of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory. Prevention and detection of new and recurrent cancers accounted for 60% of all included studies, with the most frequently examined health behaviors being smoking status (17%) and physical activity (16%). Most associations indicated a significant relationship between FCR and current smoking, with those who are currently smoking experiencing higher levels of FCR. Relatively few studies explored the relationship between FCR and surveillance. Associations categorized under Interventions for Late Effects included a range of health services use with largely mixed results. Overall, studies had moderate to high quality. Conclusions: Given the measurement heterogeneity of FCR, future research would benefit from consistent operationalization and measurement. Some evidence suggests that FCR is associated with poor health behaviors. More studies are needed examining the relationship between FCR and surveillance. Research and clinical interventions may choose to focus on early post-treatment survivorship, given greater opportunities for support and intervention around FCR and other psychosocial concerns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the contribution of IPOS to psycho-oncology Evaluation of frailty, cognitive function, and age as prognostic factors for survival in patients with IDH1wild-type high-grade glioma Survivors of child and adolescent cancer experiences of bullying at school or work: self-report and parent proxy report Family cancer caregiver use of and benefit from an internet-delivered insomnia intervention: results from a single-group feasibility trial The role of peer support and patient navigation for empowerment in breast cancer survivors: implications for community cancer control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1