通过专业探究实现有意义的教师问责:一位教师经历的叙事解读

IF 1.4 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education Pub Date : 2021-04-16 DOI:10.1080/1359866X.2021.1914319
Joanna Lim, L. Fickel, Janinka Greenwood
{"title":"通过专业探究实现有意义的教师问责:一位教师经历的叙事解读","authors":"Joanna Lim, L. Fickel, Janinka Greenwood","doi":"10.1080/1359866X.2021.1914319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Little is known about the way that teachers cope with the formalisation of professional inquiry in New Zealand. Despite its systemic implementation as an accountability-driven initiative to improve the quality of education, there are varied interpretations and enactments of professional inquiry. In this article, we will explore one teacher’s interpretation of these variations. Through a narrative lens, we will illuminate personal and contextual challenges that this teacher considered amidst the pressures of accountability. We will explicate how an internal, culturally bound sense of accountability can be juxtaposed alongside an external, policy-linked view of accountability. This juxtaposition illuminates how teachers may make sense of and legitimise the need for teaching accountability. The insights gleaned can aid educational researchers, school leaders and policymakers to better understand how teachers attach purpose and value to external accountability measures.","PeriodicalId":47276,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","volume":"50 1","pages":"202 - 214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1914319","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meaningful teacher accountability through professional inquiry: A narrative interpretation of one teacher’s experience\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Lim, L. Fickel, Janinka Greenwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1359866X.2021.1914319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Little is known about the way that teachers cope with the formalisation of professional inquiry in New Zealand. Despite its systemic implementation as an accountability-driven initiative to improve the quality of education, there are varied interpretations and enactments of professional inquiry. In this article, we will explore one teacher’s interpretation of these variations. Through a narrative lens, we will illuminate personal and contextual challenges that this teacher considered amidst the pressures of accountability. We will explicate how an internal, culturally bound sense of accountability can be juxtaposed alongside an external, policy-linked view of accountability. This juxtaposition illuminates how teachers may make sense of and legitimise the need for teaching accountability. The insights gleaned can aid educational researchers, school leaders and policymakers to better understand how teachers attach purpose and value to external accountability measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"202 - 214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1914319\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1914319\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1914319","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:在新西兰,教师应对专业探究形式化的方式鲜为人知。尽管它是一项以问责为导向的旨在提高教育质量的举措,但对专业调查的解释和规定各不相同。在这篇文章中,我们将探讨一位老师对这些变体的解释。通过叙述的镜头,我们将阐明这位教师在责任的压力下所考虑的个人和情境挑战。我们将阐述如何将内部的、文化约束的责任感与外部的、与政策相关的责任观并置。这种并置说明了教师如何理解教学问责制的必要性并使其合法化。收集到的见解可以帮助教育研究人员、学校领导和政策制定者更好地了解教师如何将目标和价值观附加到外部问责措施中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meaningful teacher accountability through professional inquiry: A narrative interpretation of one teacher’s experience
ABSTRACT Little is known about the way that teachers cope with the formalisation of professional inquiry in New Zealand. Despite its systemic implementation as an accountability-driven initiative to improve the quality of education, there are varied interpretations and enactments of professional inquiry. In this article, we will explore one teacher’s interpretation of these variations. Through a narrative lens, we will illuminate personal and contextual challenges that this teacher considered amidst the pressures of accountability. We will explicate how an internal, culturally bound sense of accountability can be juxtaposed alongside an external, policy-linked view of accountability. This juxtaposition illuminates how teachers may make sense of and legitimise the need for teaching accountability. The insights gleaned can aid educational researchers, school leaders and policymakers to better understand how teachers attach purpose and value to external accountability measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: This journal promotes rigorous research that makes a significant contribution to advancing knowledge in teacher education across early childhood, primary, secondary, vocational education and training, and higher education. The journal editors invite for peer review theoretically informed papers - including, but not limited to, empirically grounded research - which focus on significant issues relevant to an international audience in regards to: Teacher education (including initial teacher education and ongoing professional education) of teachers internationally; The cultural, economic, political, social and/or technological dimensions and contexts of teacher education; Change, stability, reform and resistance in (and relating to) teacher education; Improving the quality and impact of research in teacher education.
期刊最新文献
Preschool educators’ use of commanding language in China and Japan: a cross-cultural comparative study Making teacher educators’ experiences visible: seeing inside the hopeful and ambiguous dimensions of practice Second language teacher professional development: Technological innovations for post-emergency teacher education “Can’t you just tell us when to teach them how to use an apostrophe?” The worthwhile struggle to cultivate agential preservice teachers in a compliance culture How ‘academic’ should academic writing be? Or: why form should follow function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1