不对称下的合作?中美核关系的未来

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Washington Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/0163660X.2021.1934253
Fiona S. Cunningham
{"title":"不对称下的合作?中美核关系的未来","authors":"Fiona S. Cunningham","doi":"10.1080/0163660X.2021.1934253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Warning signs that nuclear weapons could become a key component of US-China competition have appeared in the last two years, after those weapons have remained firmly in the background of the relationship for decades. On October 1, 2019, China showcased a series of sophisticated nuclear missiles as the finale to its military parade commemorating the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic. In April 2020, the United States insisted on Chinese participation in trilateral negotiations with Russia about a future nuclear arms control agreement. Chinese officials flatly refused to participate. In May 2020, an op-ed by the editor of theGlobal Times, a Chinese tabloid known for its hardline, nationalistic editorial line, called for China to increase its arsenal size. US officials seized on the op-ed as evidence that China was planning a sprint to nuclear parity with the United States and Russia. In China, the op-ed sparked public debate and a vocal defense of the adequacy of China’s small arsenal by a recently retired Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) nuclear researcher.","PeriodicalId":46957,"journal":{"name":"Washington Quarterly","volume":"44 1","pages":"159 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0163660X.2021.1934253","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cooperation under Asymmetry? The Future of US-China Nuclear Relations\",\"authors\":\"Fiona S. Cunningham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0163660X.2021.1934253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Warning signs that nuclear weapons could become a key component of US-China competition have appeared in the last two years, after those weapons have remained firmly in the background of the relationship for decades. On October 1, 2019, China showcased a series of sophisticated nuclear missiles as the finale to its military parade commemorating the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic. In April 2020, the United States insisted on Chinese participation in trilateral negotiations with Russia about a future nuclear arms control agreement. Chinese officials flatly refused to participate. In May 2020, an op-ed by the editor of theGlobal Times, a Chinese tabloid known for its hardline, nationalistic editorial line, called for China to increase its arsenal size. US officials seized on the op-ed as evidence that China was planning a sprint to nuclear parity with the United States and Russia. In China, the op-ed sparked public debate and a vocal defense of the adequacy of China’s small arsenal by a recently retired Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) nuclear researcher.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Washington Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"159 - 180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0163660X.2021.1934253\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Washington Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2021.1934253\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Washington Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2021.1934253","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

过去两年出现了核武器可能成为美中竞争关键组成部分的警告信号,而几十年来,这些武器一直是两国关系的重要背景。2019年10月1日,中国在纪念中华人民共和国成立70周年阅兵式上展示了一系列先进的核导弹。2020年4月,美国坚持要求中国参与与俄罗斯关于未来核军备控制协议的三边谈判。中国官员断然拒绝参加。2020年5月,以强硬的民族主义社论路线而闻名的中国小报《环球时报》的一篇社论呼吁中国扩大其武器库规模。美国官员抓住这篇专栏文章作为证据,证明中国正计划加速实现与美国和俄罗斯的核均势。在中国,这篇专栏文章引发了公众的讨论,一位最近退休的中国人民解放军(PLA)核研究人员对中国小型核武库的充足性进行了直言不讳的辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cooperation under Asymmetry? The Future of US-China Nuclear Relations
Warning signs that nuclear weapons could become a key component of US-China competition have appeared in the last two years, after those weapons have remained firmly in the background of the relationship for decades. On October 1, 2019, China showcased a series of sophisticated nuclear missiles as the finale to its military parade commemorating the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic. In April 2020, the United States insisted on Chinese participation in trilateral negotiations with Russia about a future nuclear arms control agreement. Chinese officials flatly refused to participate. In May 2020, an op-ed by the editor of theGlobal Times, a Chinese tabloid known for its hardline, nationalistic editorial line, called for China to increase its arsenal size. US officials seized on the op-ed as evidence that China was planning a sprint to nuclear parity with the United States and Russia. In China, the op-ed sparked public debate and a vocal defense of the adequacy of China’s small arsenal by a recently retired Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) nuclear researcher.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Washington Quarterly (TWQ) is a journal of global affairs that analyzes strategic security challenges, changes, and their public policy implications. TWQ is published out of one of the world"s preeminent international policy institutions, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and addresses topics such as: •The U.S. role in the world •Emerging great powers: Europe, China, Russia, India, and Japan •Regional issues and flashpoints, particularly in the Middle East and Asia •Weapons of mass destruction proliferation and missile defenses •Global perspectives to reduce terrorism Contributors are drawn from outside as well as inside the United States and reflect diverse political, regional, and professional perspectives.
期刊最新文献
A Fragile Equilibrium: Incentivizing Pakistan’s Regional Recalibration Befuddled: How America Can Get Its Voice Back How Putin’s Regime Survivalism Drives Russian Aggression Carbon Time Machine Can South Korea Trust the United States?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1