从碱性土壤中去除无机碳:在高CO2实验中对土壤有机碳测量的未被充分认识的影响

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Biogeochemistry Pub Date : 2023-08-06 DOI:10.1007/s10533-023-01073-4
Kelsey H. Jensen, Jed P. Sparks
{"title":"从碱性土壤中去除无机碳:在高CO2实验中对土壤有机碳测量的未被充分认识的影响","authors":"Kelsey H. Jensen,&nbsp;Jed P. Sparks","doi":"10.1007/s10533-023-01073-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Isolating soil organic carbon (SOC) from soil inorganic carbon (SIC) is necessary to quantify SOC stocks and understanding SOC dynamics. Inorganic acids are commonly used to remove SIC and several methods have been developed to minimize the impacts these acid treatments have on the residual SOC. Negative impacts on the SOC pool, such as underestimating SOC stocks, are caused in part due to differences in the amount and composition of the organic matter pool. The effects of SIC removal on SOC are often ignored within experimental studies based on the assumption that soils from the same site do not differ enough to impact results. However, some experimental treatments, such as elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, change SOC pools in both concentration and composition. Therefore, SIC removal can introduce different biases in control and treatment soils that may differ by method. In this work, we compare two commonly used methods of SIC removal on a set of soil samples from the same elevated CO<sub>2</sub>?experiment. We use soils from the Nevada Desert Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment Facility to quantify how SIC removal with either acid washing or acid fumigation affect SOC in control and elevated CO<sub>2</sub> plots. We then use the difference in SOC (%C and δ<sup>13</sup>C) between methods to infer changes in the SOC pool driven by the elevated CO<sub>2</sub> treatment. Our results show that acid washing underestimates SOC relative to fumigation and that this difference is larger in soils from control CO<sub>2</sub> plots than elevated CO<sub>2</sub> plots. This may suggest that stabilization mechanisms sensitive to acidification, such as calcium bridging, are disrupted under elevated CO<sub>2</sub> treatment and therefore are less susceptible to SOC loss during acid washing. Our results present future research avenues for exploring the effects of acidic organic compounds, such as root exudates, on SOC stability in alkaline soils.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8901,"journal":{"name":"Biogeochemistry","volume":"165 1","pages":"15 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inorganic carbon removal from alkaline soils: an underappreciated influence on soil organic carbon measurements in an elevated CO2 experiment\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey H. Jensen,&nbsp;Jed P. Sparks\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10533-023-01073-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Isolating soil organic carbon (SOC) from soil inorganic carbon (SIC) is necessary to quantify SOC stocks and understanding SOC dynamics. Inorganic acids are commonly used to remove SIC and several methods have been developed to minimize the impacts these acid treatments have on the residual SOC. Negative impacts on the SOC pool, such as underestimating SOC stocks, are caused in part due to differences in the amount and composition of the organic matter pool. The effects of SIC removal on SOC are often ignored within experimental studies based on the assumption that soils from the same site do not differ enough to impact results. However, some experimental treatments, such as elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, change SOC pools in both concentration and composition. Therefore, SIC removal can introduce different biases in control and treatment soils that may differ by method. In this work, we compare two commonly used methods of SIC removal on a set of soil samples from the same elevated CO<sub>2</sub>?experiment. We use soils from the Nevada Desert Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment Facility to quantify how SIC removal with either acid washing or acid fumigation affect SOC in control and elevated CO<sub>2</sub> plots. We then use the difference in SOC (%C and δ<sup>13</sup>C) between methods to infer changes in the SOC pool driven by the elevated CO<sub>2</sub> treatment. Our results show that acid washing underestimates SOC relative to fumigation and that this difference is larger in soils from control CO<sub>2</sub> plots than elevated CO<sub>2</sub> plots. This may suggest that stabilization mechanisms sensitive to acidification, such as calcium bridging, are disrupted under elevated CO<sub>2</sub> treatment and therefore are less susceptible to SOC loss during acid washing. Our results present future research avenues for exploring the effects of acidic organic compounds, such as root exudates, on SOC stability in alkaline soils.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biogeochemistry\",\"volume\":\"165 1\",\"pages\":\"15 - 27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biogeochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10533-023-01073-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10533-023-01073-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分离土壤有机碳(SOC)和无机碳(SIC)是定量土壤有机碳储量和了解土壤有机碳动态的必要条件。无机酸通常用于去除SIC,并且已经开发了几种方法来最小化这些酸处理对残余SOC的影响。对有机碳库的负面影响,如低估有机碳储量,部分是由于有机质库数量和组成的差异造成的。在实验研究中,SIC去除对有机碳的影响常常被忽略,因为假设同一地点的土壤差异不足以影响结果。然而,一些实验处理,如大气CO2浓度升高,改变了有机碳库的浓度和组成。因此,SIC去除会在控制和处理土壤中引入不同的偏差,这些偏差可能因方法而异。在这项工作中,我们比较了两种常用的去除SIC的方法,这些方法来自同一升高的CO2实验的一组土壤样品。我们使用来自内华达州沙漠自由空气二氧化碳富集设施的土壤来量化酸洗或酸熏蒸去除SIC对对照和升高CO2地块的有机碳的影响。然后,我们利用两种方法之间的有机碳(%C和δ13C)差异来推断二氧化碳处理升高导致的有机碳池变化。我们的研究结果表明,相对于熏蒸,酸洗低估了土壤的有机碳,这种差异在控制二氧化碳浓度的土壤中比在二氧化碳浓度升高的土壤中更大。这可能表明,对酸化敏感的稳定机制,如钙桥接,在高浓度CO2处理下被破坏,因此在酸洗过程中不太容易受到SOC损失的影响。我们的研究结果为探索酸性有机化合物(如根分泌物)对碱性土壤有机碳稳定性的影响提供了未来的研究途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inorganic carbon removal from alkaline soils: an underappreciated influence on soil organic carbon measurements in an elevated CO2 experiment

Isolating soil organic carbon (SOC) from soil inorganic carbon (SIC) is necessary to quantify SOC stocks and understanding SOC dynamics. Inorganic acids are commonly used to remove SIC and several methods have been developed to minimize the impacts these acid treatments have on the residual SOC. Negative impacts on the SOC pool, such as underestimating SOC stocks, are caused in part due to differences in the amount and composition of the organic matter pool. The effects of SIC removal on SOC are often ignored within experimental studies based on the assumption that soils from the same site do not differ enough to impact results. However, some experimental treatments, such as elevated atmospheric CO2, change SOC pools in both concentration and composition. Therefore, SIC removal can introduce different biases in control and treatment soils that may differ by method. In this work, we compare two commonly used methods of SIC removal on a set of soil samples from the same elevated CO2?experiment. We use soils from the Nevada Desert Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment Facility to quantify how SIC removal with either acid washing or acid fumigation affect SOC in control and elevated CO2 plots. We then use the difference in SOC (%C and δ13C) between methods to infer changes in the SOC pool driven by the elevated CO2 treatment. Our results show that acid washing underestimates SOC relative to fumigation and that this difference is larger in soils from control CO2 plots than elevated CO2 plots. This may suggest that stabilization mechanisms sensitive to acidification, such as calcium bridging, are disrupted under elevated CO2 treatment and therefore are less susceptible to SOC loss during acid washing. Our results present future research avenues for exploring the effects of acidic organic compounds, such as root exudates, on SOC stability in alkaline soils.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biogeochemistry
Biogeochemistry 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3.2 months
期刊介绍: Biogeochemistry publishes original and synthetic papers dealing with biotic controls on the chemistry of the environment, or with the geochemical control of the structure and function of ecosystems. Cycles are considered, either of individual elements or of specific classes of natural or anthropogenic compounds in ecosystems. Particular emphasis is given to coupled interactions of element cycles. The journal spans from the molecular to global scales to elucidate the mechanisms driving patterns in biogeochemical cycles through space and time. Studies on both natural and artificial ecosystems are published when they contribute to a general understanding of biogeochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Cycling of dissolved organic nutrients and indications for nutrient limitations in contrasting Amazon rainforest ecosystems Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration declines with climate warming in subalpine and alpine grassland soils Iron fertilization and soil carbon sequestration in rice paddies How the effect of earthworms on soil organic matter mineralization and stabilization is affected by litter quality and stage of soil development Rainfall events stimulate episodic associative nitrogen fixation in switchgrass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1