{"title":"废物和环境水中烟草(尼古丁)和酒精(乙醇)残留物的发生、归宿和测定","authors":"Taja Verovšek , David Heath , Ester Heath","doi":"10.1016/j.teac.2022.e00164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This review includes one hundred and two peer reviewed papers that focus on metabolic residues of the two most used licit drugs globally, nicotine (nicotine, cotinine, trans-3’-hydroxycotinine – HCOT) and alcohol (ethyl sulphate and ethyl glucuronide), in waste- and environmental waters. Sampling strategies and analytical methods are also summarised and discussed. Although grab sampling is the most widely applied method for collecting environmental samples (74% cases), wastewater samples are typically composite samples collected automatically at the wastewater treatment plants (66% cases). Sample preparation and analysis usually include solid-phase extraction (SPE) followed by reverse-phased liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection (RP-LC-MS/MS) for nicotine residues. In contrast, alcohol residues are commonly determined via direct injection onto the LC-MS/MS using an ion-pair reagent to improve retention, leaving room for method improvement, e.g., introducing a suitable extraction procedure to achieve lower detection limits and quantification. In comparison to alcohol residues, more studies look into nicotine residues (85% of the studies). Concentration ranges for nicotine, cotinine, HCOT and ethyl sulphate were < 424,000, < 42,300, 50–52,000 and 500–33,000 ng/L in wastewater influents and 15–32,000, < 18,000, 15–1,552 and < 500 ng/L in effluents, while nicotine (12.6–947 ng/L) and cotinine (17–62 ng/L) were detected in reclaimed waters. Among environmental waters, the highest concentrations of nicotine residues were measured in surface waters (nicotine: < 9,340 ng/L, cotinine: < 6,582 ng/L and HCOT: 14–777 ng/L), while their concentrations in groundwater and drinking water were generally in the low ng/L range. This review also reveals the discrepancy between the number of studies in developed countries (90%) compared to developing countries and the need for more studies in the former, where most wastewater flows untreated into the environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56032,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article e00164"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158822000113/pdfft?md5=8ea02722a8ecfafdd6ad529a638158a1&pid=1-s2.0-S2214158822000113-main.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occurrence, fate and determination of tobacco (nicotine) and alcohol (ethanol) residues in waste- and environmental waters\",\"authors\":\"Taja Verovšek , David Heath , Ester Heath\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teac.2022.e00164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This review includes one hundred and two peer reviewed papers that focus on metabolic residues of the two most used licit drugs globally, nicotine (nicotine, cotinine, trans-3’-hydroxycotinine – HCOT) and alcohol (ethyl sulphate and ethyl glucuronide), in waste- and environmental waters. Sampling strategies and analytical methods are also summarised and discussed. Although grab sampling is the most widely applied method for collecting environmental samples (74% cases), wastewater samples are typically composite samples collected automatically at the wastewater treatment plants (66% cases). Sample preparation and analysis usually include solid-phase extraction (SPE) followed by reverse-phased liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection (RP-LC-MS/MS) for nicotine residues. In contrast, alcohol residues are commonly determined via direct injection onto the LC-MS/MS using an ion-pair reagent to improve retention, leaving room for method improvement, e.g., introducing a suitable extraction procedure to achieve lower detection limits and quantification. In comparison to alcohol residues, more studies look into nicotine residues (85% of the studies). Concentration ranges for nicotine, cotinine, HCOT and ethyl sulphate were < 424,000, < 42,300, 50–52,000 and 500–33,000 ng/L in wastewater influents and 15–32,000, < 18,000, 15–1,552 and < 500 ng/L in effluents, while nicotine (12.6–947 ng/L) and cotinine (17–62 ng/L) were detected in reclaimed waters. Among environmental waters, the highest concentrations of nicotine residues were measured in surface waters (nicotine: < 9,340 ng/L, cotinine: < 6,582 ng/L and HCOT: 14–777 ng/L), while their concentrations in groundwater and drinking water were generally in the low ng/L range. This review also reveals the discrepancy between the number of studies in developed countries (90%) compared to developing countries and the need for more studies in the former, where most wastewater flows untreated into the environment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158822000113/pdfft?md5=8ea02722a8ecfafdd6ad529a638158a1&pid=1-s2.0-S2214158822000113-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158822000113\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158822000113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Occurrence, fate and determination of tobacco (nicotine) and alcohol (ethanol) residues in waste- and environmental waters
This review includes one hundred and two peer reviewed papers that focus on metabolic residues of the two most used licit drugs globally, nicotine (nicotine, cotinine, trans-3’-hydroxycotinine – HCOT) and alcohol (ethyl sulphate and ethyl glucuronide), in waste- and environmental waters. Sampling strategies and analytical methods are also summarised and discussed. Although grab sampling is the most widely applied method for collecting environmental samples (74% cases), wastewater samples are typically composite samples collected automatically at the wastewater treatment plants (66% cases). Sample preparation and analysis usually include solid-phase extraction (SPE) followed by reverse-phased liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection (RP-LC-MS/MS) for nicotine residues. In contrast, alcohol residues are commonly determined via direct injection onto the LC-MS/MS using an ion-pair reagent to improve retention, leaving room for method improvement, e.g., introducing a suitable extraction procedure to achieve lower detection limits and quantification. In comparison to alcohol residues, more studies look into nicotine residues (85% of the studies). Concentration ranges for nicotine, cotinine, HCOT and ethyl sulphate were < 424,000, < 42,300, 50–52,000 and 500–33,000 ng/L in wastewater influents and 15–32,000, < 18,000, 15–1,552 and < 500 ng/L in effluents, while nicotine (12.6–947 ng/L) and cotinine (17–62 ng/L) were detected in reclaimed waters. Among environmental waters, the highest concentrations of nicotine residues were measured in surface waters (nicotine: < 9,340 ng/L, cotinine: < 6,582 ng/L and HCOT: 14–777 ng/L), while their concentrations in groundwater and drinking water were generally in the low ng/L range. This review also reveals the discrepancy between the number of studies in developed countries (90%) compared to developing countries and the need for more studies in the former, where most wastewater flows untreated into the environment.
期刊介绍:
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry is an authoritative journal that focuses on the dynamic field of environmental analytical chemistry. It aims to deliver concise yet insightful overviews of the latest advancements in this field. By acquiring high-quality chemical data and effectively interpreting it, we can deepen our understanding of the environment. TrEAC is committed to keeping up with the fast-paced nature of environmental analytical chemistry by providing timely coverage of innovative analytical methods used in studying environmentally relevant substances and addressing related issues.