Nurcan Duman, R. C. Sarınoğlu, Beyza Nur Kuzan, Mehmet Mucahit Güncü, Bülent Aslan, Nuri Çagatay Cimşit, A. Karahasan
{"title":"BioFire Filmarray小组对呼吸道病原体的评估:土耳其伊斯坦布尔的人口统计学和临床分析","authors":"Nurcan Duman, R. C. Sarınoğlu, Beyza Nur Kuzan, Mehmet Mucahit Güncü, Bülent Aslan, Nuri Çagatay Cimşit, A. Karahasan","doi":"10.22354/24223794.1127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aimed to analyze the distribution of respiratory pathogens(RP) detected by a multiplex PCR-based method (BioFire Diagnostics, USA) among patients with suspected respiratory tract infections (RTI) and to evaluate the demographic, clinical and radiological characteristics of infected individuals . RP were detected in 1621/6376 (25.4%) of the samples in the years 2018-2020. Rhinovirus/enterovirus (RV/EV) were the most commonly detected pathogens (38.1%) followed by influenza A and B viruses (21%) and parainfluenza virus (PIV) (9.5%). Single pathogen was detected in 1361 (84%) and multi pathogens in 260 (16%) of 1621 samples. At least one comorbidity was present in 379 (30.5%) of the patients. Fever was the most common sign followed by cough and dyspnea. Thorax CT was present in 426 of 1243 RP positive patients (34.3%). Any radiological findings was found significantly related for a specific pathogen. No medication was given to 52.9% whereas antibiotics in 35.7% and antivirals in 3.8% of the patients. Film Array panel as a multiplex PCR test is not used rationally in our hospital and results were not dramatically improve management of RTI. A better communication between clinician and microbiologist is required for efficient use of laboratory and rational use of antimicrobials.","PeriodicalId":38132,"journal":{"name":"Infectio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of BioFire Filmarray panel for respiratory pathogens: a demographic and clinical analysis in Istanbul, Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Nurcan Duman, R. C. Sarınoğlu, Beyza Nur Kuzan, Mehmet Mucahit Güncü, Bülent Aslan, Nuri Çagatay Cimşit, A. Karahasan\",\"doi\":\"10.22354/24223794.1127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We aimed to analyze the distribution of respiratory pathogens(RP) detected by a multiplex PCR-based method (BioFire Diagnostics, USA) among patients with suspected respiratory tract infections (RTI) and to evaluate the demographic, clinical and radiological characteristics of infected individuals . RP were detected in 1621/6376 (25.4%) of the samples in the years 2018-2020. Rhinovirus/enterovirus (RV/EV) were the most commonly detected pathogens (38.1%) followed by influenza A and B viruses (21%) and parainfluenza virus (PIV) (9.5%). Single pathogen was detected in 1361 (84%) and multi pathogens in 260 (16%) of 1621 samples. At least one comorbidity was present in 379 (30.5%) of the patients. Fever was the most common sign followed by cough and dyspnea. Thorax CT was present in 426 of 1243 RP positive patients (34.3%). Any radiological findings was found significantly related for a specific pathogen. No medication was given to 52.9% whereas antibiotics in 35.7% and antivirals in 3.8% of the patients. Film Array panel as a multiplex PCR test is not used rationally in our hospital and results were not dramatically improve management of RTI. A better communication between clinician and microbiologist is required for efficient use of laboratory and rational use of antimicrobials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectio\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22354/24223794.1127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22354/24223794.1127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of BioFire Filmarray panel for respiratory pathogens: a demographic and clinical analysis in Istanbul, Turkey
We aimed to analyze the distribution of respiratory pathogens(RP) detected by a multiplex PCR-based method (BioFire Diagnostics, USA) among patients with suspected respiratory tract infections (RTI) and to evaluate the demographic, clinical and radiological characteristics of infected individuals . RP were detected in 1621/6376 (25.4%) of the samples in the years 2018-2020. Rhinovirus/enterovirus (RV/EV) were the most commonly detected pathogens (38.1%) followed by influenza A and B viruses (21%) and parainfluenza virus (PIV) (9.5%). Single pathogen was detected in 1361 (84%) and multi pathogens in 260 (16%) of 1621 samples. At least one comorbidity was present in 379 (30.5%) of the patients. Fever was the most common sign followed by cough and dyspnea. Thorax CT was present in 426 of 1243 RP positive patients (34.3%). Any radiological findings was found significantly related for a specific pathogen. No medication was given to 52.9% whereas antibiotics in 35.7% and antivirals in 3.8% of the patients. Film Array panel as a multiplex PCR test is not used rationally in our hospital and results were not dramatically improve management of RTI. A better communication between clinician and microbiologist is required for efficient use of laboratory and rational use of antimicrobials.