{"title":"为什么领导力培训评估很重要","authors":"M. Jamieson, T. Wall, N. Moore","doi":"10.24384/PRB0-S320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence suggests organisations’ significant investment in leadership coaching is characterised by two evaluation paradoxes: despite high strategic expectations and substantial budgets, evaluation has low strategic status; and, where organisations do attempt to evaluate, focus contradicts espoused overarching leadership outcomes. In response to criticism that research methodologies fail to replicate complex leadership environments, this study adopts ambidexterity to produce new moderators to explore the contradictory environment for evaluation and potential for a wider strategic contribution.","PeriodicalId":44889,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring","volume":"1 1","pages":"3-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts\",\"authors\":\"M. Jamieson, T. Wall, N. Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.24384/PRB0-S320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence suggests organisations’ significant investment in leadership coaching is characterised by two evaluation paradoxes: despite high strategic expectations and substantial budgets, evaluation has low strategic status; and, where organisations do attempt to evaluate, focus contradicts espoused overarching leadership outcomes. In response to criticism that research methodologies fail to replicate complex leadership environments, this study adopts ambidexterity to produce new moderators to explore the contradictory environment for evaluation and potential for a wider strategic contribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"3-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24384/PRB0-S320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24384/PRB0-S320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evidence suggests organisations’ significant investment in leadership coaching is characterised by two evaluation paradoxes: despite high strategic expectations and substantial budgets, evaluation has low strategic status; and, where organisations do attempt to evaluate, focus contradicts espoused overarching leadership outcomes. In response to criticism that research methodologies fail to replicate complex leadership environments, this study adopts ambidexterity to produce new moderators to explore the contradictory environment for evaluation and potential for a wider strategic contribution.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
