强人总统和总统权力的两个逻辑

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Presidential Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1111/psq.12830
William G. Howell, T. Moe
{"title":"强人总统和总统权力的两个逻辑","authors":"William G. Howell, T. Moe","doi":"10.1111/psq.12830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The strongman presidency presents an acute threat to democracy. Two logics underpin its emergence, both of which implicate the administrative state. Under the fi rst, presidents have sought to deploy the vast resources of the administrative state in pursuit of power and legacy. This logic is symmetric, shaping the behavior of Republican and Democratic presidents alike. The second logic, however, sets them apart. Because most of the administrative state is the embodiment of progressive values, Democratic presidents have approached presidential power in ways that are largely compatible with its well ‐ being, whereas Republican presidents have laid claim to increasingly extreme powers in order to retrench and sabotage it. Layered on the fi rst, this asymmetric logic is the main driver of the strongman presidency — and, ultimately, a major threat to American democracy.","PeriodicalId":46768,"journal":{"name":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The strongman presidency and the two logics of presidential power\",\"authors\":\"William G. Howell, T. Moe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psq.12830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The strongman presidency presents an acute threat to democracy. Two logics underpin its emergence, both of which implicate the administrative state. Under the fi rst, presidents have sought to deploy the vast resources of the administrative state in pursuit of power and legacy. This logic is symmetric, shaping the behavior of Republican and Democratic presidents alike. The second logic, however, sets them apart. Because most of the administrative state is the embodiment of progressive values, Democratic presidents have approached presidential power in ways that are largely compatible with its well ‐ being, whereas Republican presidents have laid claim to increasingly extreme powers in order to retrench and sabotage it. Layered on the fi rst, this asymmetric logic is the main driver of the strongman presidency — and, ultimately, a major threat to American democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Presidential Studies Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Presidential Studies Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12830\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12830","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强人总统对民主构成了严重威胁。两个逻辑支撑着它的出现,这两个逻辑都涉及到行政国家。在第一种情况下,总统们试图利用行政国家的巨大资源来追求权力和遗产。这种逻辑是对称的,塑造了共和党和民主党总统的行为。然而,第二种逻辑将它们区分开来。由于大多数行政州都是进步价值观的体现,民主党总统以与总统权力基本相符的方式对待总统权力,而共和党总统则声称拥有越来越极端的权力,以紧缩和破坏总统权力,这种不对称的逻辑是强人总统任期的主要驱动力,也是对美国民主的主要威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The strongman presidency and the two logics of presidential power
The strongman presidency presents an acute threat to democracy. Two logics underpin its emergence, both of which implicate the administrative state. Under the fi rst, presidents have sought to deploy the vast resources of the administrative state in pursuit of power and legacy. This logic is symmetric, shaping the behavior of Republican and Democratic presidents alike. The second logic, however, sets them apart. Because most of the administrative state is the embodiment of progressive values, Democratic presidents have approached presidential power in ways that are largely compatible with its well ‐ being, whereas Republican presidents have laid claim to increasingly extreme powers in order to retrench and sabotage it. Layered on the fi rst, this asymmetric logic is the main driver of the strongman presidency — and, ultimately, a major threat to American democracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Presidential Studies Quarterly
Presidential Studies Quarterly POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Emotional labor in decision making: Gender, race, and relational practices in the White House The case for agency: Three dimensions of discretion in presidential agenda construction The problematic but seductive call of prerogative power Partisanship and public support for presidential norms I like Ike: The origins of broadcast presidential campaign advertising
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1