德国的军事缩编?从特朗普到拜登的美国驻欧洲部队态势

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Washington Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/0163660X.2021.1894718
Alexander Lanoszka, Luis Simón
{"title":"德国的军事缩编?从特朗普到拜登的美国驻欧洲部队态势","authors":"Alexander Lanoszka, Luis Simón","doi":"10.1080/0163660X.2021.1894718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Biden administration has promised to revitalize a transatlantic alliance that has experienced much strain during Donald Trump’s presidency. Trump’s focus on strategic competition with China, equivocal attitude toward Russia, repeated criticisms of NATO and Germany, and insistence that Europeans pay for their own defense have raised questions about the future of US defense strategy in Europe. Nevertheless, his administration in fact committed additional money and troops to deterring Russia from threatening US allies. Amid such confusing signals, one of Trump’s last acts that roiled transatlantic relations was to announce in July 2020 a plan to reduce military personnel stationed in Germany from about 34,500 to 25,000, return some portion of these troops to the United States, regroup someair and commandassets in Italy andBelgium, and reinforce theUSmilitary’s rotational presence in Poland and the Black Sea region. The announcement of these measures stunned European allies, who had not been previously consulted. The Pentagon’s 2020 plan embodied the main themes and contradictions that characterized Trump’s defense strategy in Europe: its net reduction of US forces reflected Europe’s downgraded strategic importance to Washington, partly explained by the need to prioritize Asia and partly by the belief that Europeans must be responsible for their own defense; it punished Germany; and it sought","PeriodicalId":46957,"journal":{"name":"Washington Quarterly","volume":"44 1","pages":"199 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0163660X.2021.1894718","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Military Drawdown in Germany? US Force Posture in Europe from Trump to Biden\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Lanoszka, Luis Simón\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0163660X.2021.1894718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Biden administration has promised to revitalize a transatlantic alliance that has experienced much strain during Donald Trump’s presidency. Trump’s focus on strategic competition with China, equivocal attitude toward Russia, repeated criticisms of NATO and Germany, and insistence that Europeans pay for their own defense have raised questions about the future of US defense strategy in Europe. Nevertheless, his administration in fact committed additional money and troops to deterring Russia from threatening US allies. Amid such confusing signals, one of Trump’s last acts that roiled transatlantic relations was to announce in July 2020 a plan to reduce military personnel stationed in Germany from about 34,500 to 25,000, return some portion of these troops to the United States, regroup someair and commandassets in Italy andBelgium, and reinforce theUSmilitary’s rotational presence in Poland and the Black Sea region. The announcement of these measures stunned European allies, who had not been previously consulted. The Pentagon’s 2020 plan embodied the main themes and contradictions that characterized Trump’s defense strategy in Europe: its net reduction of US forces reflected Europe’s downgraded strategic importance to Washington, partly explained by the need to prioritize Asia and partly by the belief that Europeans must be responsible for their own defense; it punished Germany; and it sought\",\"PeriodicalId\":46957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Washington Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"199 - 218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0163660X.2021.1894718\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Washington Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2021.1894718\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Washington Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2021.1894718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

拜登政府承诺重振在唐纳德·特朗普总统任期内经历了巨大压力的跨大西洋联盟。特朗普对与中国的战略竞争的关注,对俄罗斯的模棱两可的态度,对北约和德国的反复批评,以及坚持让欧洲人为自己的国防买单,都引发了人们对美国在欧洲国防战略未来的质疑。尽管如此,他的政府实际上承诺投入更多的资金和军队来阻止俄罗斯威胁美国盟友。在这些令人困惑的信号中,特朗普搅乱跨大西洋关系的最后行动之一是在2020年7月宣布一项计划,将驻扎在德国的军事人员从约34500人减少到25000人,将其中一部分部队返回美国,重新集结意大利和比利时的一些空军和指挥资产,并加强美国军队在波兰和黑海地区的轮换存在。这些措施的宣布震惊了欧洲盟友,他们此前没有征求过他们的意见。五角大楼的2020年计划体现了特朗普在欧洲防御战略的主要主题和矛盾:其对美军的净削减反映了欧洲对华盛顿的战略重要性降低,部分原因是需要优先考虑亚洲,部分原因在于欧洲人必须对自己的防御负责;它惩罚了德国;它寻求
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Military Drawdown in Germany? US Force Posture in Europe from Trump to Biden
The Biden administration has promised to revitalize a transatlantic alliance that has experienced much strain during Donald Trump’s presidency. Trump’s focus on strategic competition with China, equivocal attitude toward Russia, repeated criticisms of NATO and Germany, and insistence that Europeans pay for their own defense have raised questions about the future of US defense strategy in Europe. Nevertheless, his administration in fact committed additional money and troops to deterring Russia from threatening US allies. Amid such confusing signals, one of Trump’s last acts that roiled transatlantic relations was to announce in July 2020 a plan to reduce military personnel stationed in Germany from about 34,500 to 25,000, return some portion of these troops to the United States, regroup someair and commandassets in Italy andBelgium, and reinforce theUSmilitary’s rotational presence in Poland and the Black Sea region. The announcement of these measures stunned European allies, who had not been previously consulted. The Pentagon’s 2020 plan embodied the main themes and contradictions that characterized Trump’s defense strategy in Europe: its net reduction of US forces reflected Europe’s downgraded strategic importance to Washington, partly explained by the need to prioritize Asia and partly by the belief that Europeans must be responsible for their own defense; it punished Germany; and it sought
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Washington Quarterly (TWQ) is a journal of global affairs that analyzes strategic security challenges, changes, and their public policy implications. TWQ is published out of one of the world"s preeminent international policy institutions, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and addresses topics such as: •The U.S. role in the world •Emerging great powers: Europe, China, Russia, India, and Japan •Regional issues and flashpoints, particularly in the Middle East and Asia •Weapons of mass destruction proliferation and missile defenses •Global perspectives to reduce terrorism Contributors are drawn from outside as well as inside the United States and reflect diverse political, regional, and professional perspectives.
期刊最新文献
A Fragile Equilibrium: Incentivizing Pakistan’s Regional Recalibration Befuddled: How America Can Get Its Voice Back How Putin’s Regime Survivalism Drives Russian Aggression Carbon Time Machine Can South Korea Trust the United States?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1