应用临床模拟评估MSW学生的参与技能

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Teaching in Social Work Pub Date : 2023-03-14 DOI:10.1080/08841233.2023.2169434
Dolly Sacristan, C. D. Martinez
{"title":"应用临床模拟评估MSW学生的参与技能","authors":"Dolly Sacristan, C. D. Martinez","doi":"10.1080/08841233.2023.2169434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Social work educators are compelled to use reliable and valid methods to assess student learning outcomes. This study adapted a clinical simulation by integrating traditional role-play of case scenarios and elements of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination, which is often used to assess students’ practice skills. Master of Social Work (MSW) students’ engagement skills were assessed at the end of the first semester of their foundation year using the clinical simulation. Participants were first-year MSW students from two theory and practice courses. The study demonstrated the value of using a clinical simulation in practice courses to assess engagement skills. Correlations of self, peer, and instructor performance scores were compared and interrater reliability was assessed. Peers rated their classmates’ performance the highest, and some peer ratings were negatively correlated with instructor ratings. There was higher correspondence in self- and instructor ratings in some skills and poor correspondence in others. Peers tended to rate their classmates’ performance as showing intermediate proficiency, while self- and instructor ratings of engagement skills indicated basic proficiency. Overall, there was poor interrater reliability. Challenges relating to the implementation of a clinical simulation and its implications for social work education are examined.","PeriodicalId":51728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teaching in Social Work","volume":"43 1","pages":"155 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Clinical Simulation to Assess MSW Students’ Engagement Skills\",\"authors\":\"Dolly Sacristan, C. D. Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08841233.2023.2169434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Social work educators are compelled to use reliable and valid methods to assess student learning outcomes. This study adapted a clinical simulation by integrating traditional role-play of case scenarios and elements of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination, which is often used to assess students’ practice skills. Master of Social Work (MSW) students’ engagement skills were assessed at the end of the first semester of their foundation year using the clinical simulation. Participants were first-year MSW students from two theory and practice courses. The study demonstrated the value of using a clinical simulation in practice courses to assess engagement skills. Correlations of self, peer, and instructor performance scores were compared and interrater reliability was assessed. Peers rated their classmates’ performance the highest, and some peer ratings were negatively correlated with instructor ratings. There was higher correspondence in self- and instructor ratings in some skills and poor correspondence in others. Peers tended to rate their classmates’ performance as showing intermediate proficiency, while self- and instructor ratings of engagement skills indicated basic proficiency. Overall, there was poor interrater reliability. Challenges relating to the implementation of a clinical simulation and its implications for social work education are examined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Teaching in Social Work\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"155 - 174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Teaching in Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2023.2169434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teaching in Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2023.2169434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要社会工作教育工作者必须使用可靠有效的方法来评估学生的学习成果。这项研究通过整合病例场景的传统角色扮演和目标结构化临床考试的元素,对临床模拟进行了调整,该考试通常用于评估学生的实践技能。社会工作硕士(MSW)学生的参与技能在基础年第一学期末使用临床模拟进行评估。参与者是来自两门理论和实践课程的MSW一年级学生。该研究证明了在实践课程中使用临床模拟来评估参与技能的价值。比较了自我、同伴和教练表现得分的相关性,并评估了参与者之间的可靠性。同龄人对同学的表现评价最高,一些同龄人的评价与导师的评价呈负相关。在某些技能中,自我和教练的对应性较高,而在其他技能中,对应性较差。同龄人倾向于将同学的表现评为中等水平,而自我和教练对参与技能的评分则表明基本水平。总体而言,参与者之间的可靠性较差。研究了与临床模拟实施相关的挑战及其对社会工作教育的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Clinical Simulation to Assess MSW Students’ Engagement Skills
ABSTRACT Social work educators are compelled to use reliable and valid methods to assess student learning outcomes. This study adapted a clinical simulation by integrating traditional role-play of case scenarios and elements of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination, which is often used to assess students’ practice skills. Master of Social Work (MSW) students’ engagement skills were assessed at the end of the first semester of their foundation year using the clinical simulation. Participants were first-year MSW students from two theory and practice courses. The study demonstrated the value of using a clinical simulation in practice courses to assess engagement skills. Correlations of self, peer, and instructor performance scores were compared and interrater reliability was assessed. Peers rated their classmates’ performance the highest, and some peer ratings were negatively correlated with instructor ratings. There was higher correspondence in self- and instructor ratings in some skills and poor correspondence in others. Peers tended to rate their classmates’ performance as showing intermediate proficiency, while self- and instructor ratings of engagement skills indicated basic proficiency. Overall, there was poor interrater reliability. Challenges relating to the implementation of a clinical simulation and its implications for social work education are examined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Teaching in Social Work
Journal of Teaching in Social Work EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Teaching in Social Work fills a long-standing gap in the social work literature by providing opportunities for creative and able teachers—in schools, agency-based training programs, and direct practice—to share with their colleagues what experience and systematic study has taught them about successful teaching. Through articles focusing on the teacher, the teaching process, and new contexts of teaching, the journal is an essential forum for teaching and learning processes and the factors affecting their quality. The journal recognizes that all social work practitioners who wish to teach (whatever their specialty) should know the philosophies of teaching and learning as well as educational methods and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Anti-Racism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Perspectives Across the Explicit Curriculum: Insights and Efforts from a School of Social Work Suicide Prevention Training for Social Work Students in Rural Practicum Placements: Current Opportunities and Areas for Growth The Moral Conundrum of Reproductive Justice in Social Work Indicators of Wellness Among Social Work Students within an Urban Setting During Times of Crisis Teaching Social Justice After the Dobbs Decision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1