数字化学习

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Topics in Clinical Nutrition Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1097/TIN.0000000000000278
Lauren E. Chan, R. Brody, S. Dobak, Sarah Peterson
{"title":"数字化学习","authors":"Lauren E. Chan, R. Brody, S. Dobak, Sarah Peterson","doi":"10.1097/TIN.0000000000000278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nutrition and dietetics education content is uncommon on online platforms. This cross-sectional study evaluated learning preferences and YouTube usage for nutrition education via a Web-based survey of 185 members of Dietitians in Nutrition Support. In-person learning (43%) and video (33%) were preferred learning modalities. Age (P = .008) and practice years (P = .02) were significantly different between modality preference. More than one-half of respondents have used and recommended a video for nutrition education. Top barriers for using educational videos were lack of relevant content and challenges identifying valid resources. Nutrition organizations should prioritize building relevant, evidenced-based video content for education.","PeriodicalId":48681,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Clinical Nutrition","volume":"37 1","pages":"89 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Learning\",\"authors\":\"Lauren E. Chan, R. Brody, S. Dobak, Sarah Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TIN.0000000000000278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nutrition and dietetics education content is uncommon on online platforms. This cross-sectional study evaluated learning preferences and YouTube usage for nutrition education via a Web-based survey of 185 members of Dietitians in Nutrition Support. In-person learning (43%) and video (33%) were preferred learning modalities. Age (P = .008) and practice years (P = .02) were significantly different between modality preference. More than one-half of respondents have used and recommended a video for nutrition education. Top barriers for using educational videos were lack of relevant content and challenges identifying valid resources. Nutrition organizations should prioritize building relevant, evidenced-based video content for education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Clinical Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"89 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Clinical Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TIN.0000000000000278\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TIN.0000000000000278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

营养和营养学教育内容在网络平台上并不常见。这项横断面研究通过对185名营养支持营养师的网络调查,评估了营养教育的学习偏好和YouTube使用情况。面对面学习(43%)和视频(33%)是首选的学习方式。模式偏好之间的年龄(P=0.008)和实践年限(P=0.02)有显著差异。超过一半的受访者使用并推荐了营养教育视频。使用教育视频的最大障碍是缺乏相关内容和识别有效资源的挑战。营养组织应优先构建相关的、基于证据的教育视频内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital Learning
Nutrition and dietetics education content is uncommon on online platforms. This cross-sectional study evaluated learning preferences and YouTube usage for nutrition education via a Web-based survey of 185 members of Dietitians in Nutrition Support. In-person learning (43%) and video (33%) were preferred learning modalities. Age (P = .008) and practice years (P = .02) were significantly different between modality preference. More than one-half of respondents have used and recommended a video for nutrition education. Top barriers for using educational videos were lack of relevant content and challenges identifying valid resources. Nutrition organizations should prioritize building relevant, evidenced-based video content for education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Clinical Nutrition
Topics in Clinical Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: ​​Topics in Clinical Nutrition (TICN) is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal designed as a resource for the continuing education and clinical practice of dietitians and nutritionists. Each issue addresses topics of interest primarily to dietitians and nutritionists, students and interns in professional training programs and other health care personnel involved in the nutritional care of patients. Articles include translational research reports (work that applies new knowledge to practical effect), practice projects, evidence-based literature reviews, case studies and book reviews, and articles that highlight education theory and applied research which share the tools and techniques of nutrition and dietetics education.
期刊最新文献
A Nationwide Survey of Clinical Dietitians' Perceptions of Precepting Thanks to Our Reviewers Association of Food Insecurity With Malnutrition and Cognitive Status in Elderly Referred to Outpatient Clinics of Milad Hospital in Tehran Preventive Effects of Prenatal Folic Acid on Postpartum Depression Food Insecurity in College Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1