{"title":"学术研究成果和尼日利亚讲师对掠夺性期刊的脆弱性","authors":"Ogagaoghene Uzezi IDHALAMA (CLN), Kingsley Efe OSAWARU (CLN), Magnus Osahon IGBINOVIA (CLN), Prisca Iheoma Nwachukwu","doi":"10.22158/wjer.v10n1p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated scholarly research outputs and vulnerability of Nigerian lecturers to predatory journals. Five objectives were formulated to guide the study. A descriptive survey research design was adopted using the online Google Form to collect data/responses from lecturers across board in Nigeria. The population of the study comprised lecturers in Nigeria. The sampling technique used for the study was the total enumeration sampling technique (107) as the whole responses were analysed using frequencies, percentages, mean and standard deviation for easy appreciation and comprehension, with the aid of SPSS Version 23. It was found out that: The research outputs by Nigerian lecturers appear to be a little bit low, Nigerian lecturers obviously know the reputable journals that are available, many Nigerian authors and writers do not publish in high reputable journals, some of the challenges recorded are high cost/finance, problem of delayed review process, high rejection rate by reputable journal and rigorous online submission process. Also, the idea of compulsorily publishing in high impact journals rather than focus on the quality of the research output, before promoting lecturers is misplaced and should be reviewed. Recommendations were made in line with the findings of the study.","PeriodicalId":93059,"journal":{"name":"World journal of educational research (Los Angeles, Calif.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scholarly Research Outputs and Vulnerability of Nigerian Lecturers to Predatory Journals\",\"authors\":\"Ogagaoghene Uzezi IDHALAMA (CLN), Kingsley Efe OSAWARU (CLN), Magnus Osahon IGBINOVIA (CLN), Prisca Iheoma Nwachukwu\",\"doi\":\"10.22158/wjer.v10n1p1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated scholarly research outputs and vulnerability of Nigerian lecturers to predatory journals. Five objectives were formulated to guide the study. A descriptive survey research design was adopted using the online Google Form to collect data/responses from lecturers across board in Nigeria. The population of the study comprised lecturers in Nigeria. The sampling technique used for the study was the total enumeration sampling technique (107) as the whole responses were analysed using frequencies, percentages, mean and standard deviation for easy appreciation and comprehension, with the aid of SPSS Version 23. It was found out that: The research outputs by Nigerian lecturers appear to be a little bit low, Nigerian lecturers obviously know the reputable journals that are available, many Nigerian authors and writers do not publish in high reputable journals, some of the challenges recorded are high cost/finance, problem of delayed review process, high rejection rate by reputable journal and rigorous online submission process. Also, the idea of compulsorily publishing in high impact journals rather than focus on the quality of the research output, before promoting lecturers is misplaced and should be reviewed. Recommendations were made in line with the findings of the study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of educational research (Los Angeles, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of educational research (Los Angeles, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22158/wjer.v10n1p1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of educational research (Los Angeles, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/wjer.v10n1p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究调查了学术研究成果和尼日利亚讲师对掠夺性期刊的脆弱性。制定了五个目标来指导研究。采用描述性调查研究设计,使用在线谷歌表格收集尼日利亚各地讲师的数据/回复。研究对象包括尼日利亚的讲师。研究中使用的抽样技术是总枚举抽样技术(107),因为整个响应使用频率,百分比,平均值和标准差进行分析,以便于欣赏和理解,借助SPSS Version 23。研究发现:尼日利亚讲师的研究产出似乎有点低,尼日利亚讲师显然知道可用的知名期刊,许多尼日利亚作者和作者不在知名期刊上发表文章,记录的一些挑战是高成本/财务,审稿过程延迟的问题,知名期刊的高退稿率和严格的在线提交程序。此外,在提拔讲师之前,强制在高影响力期刊上发表论文,而不是把重点放在研究成果的质量上,这种想法是错误的,应该加以审查。建议是根据研究结果提出的。
Scholarly Research Outputs and Vulnerability of Nigerian Lecturers to Predatory Journals
This study investigated scholarly research outputs and vulnerability of Nigerian lecturers to predatory journals. Five objectives were formulated to guide the study. A descriptive survey research design was adopted using the online Google Form to collect data/responses from lecturers across board in Nigeria. The population of the study comprised lecturers in Nigeria. The sampling technique used for the study was the total enumeration sampling technique (107) as the whole responses were analysed using frequencies, percentages, mean and standard deviation for easy appreciation and comprehension, with the aid of SPSS Version 23. It was found out that: The research outputs by Nigerian lecturers appear to be a little bit low, Nigerian lecturers obviously know the reputable journals that are available, many Nigerian authors and writers do not publish in high reputable journals, some of the challenges recorded are high cost/finance, problem of delayed review process, high rejection rate by reputable journal and rigorous online submission process. Also, the idea of compulsorily publishing in high impact journals rather than focus on the quality of the research output, before promoting lecturers is misplaced and should be reviewed. Recommendations were made in line with the findings of the study.