重温爪哇伊斯兰教

Gedong Maulana Kabir
{"title":"重温爪哇伊斯兰教","authors":"Gedong Maulana Kabir","doi":"10.21274/dinamika.2021.21.02.315-330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article tends to revisiting Javanese Islamic studies. This study began from the European travelers’ period who noted some aspects of society such as the religious life. Those notes show the negative label that is addressed to the Javanese religious practices. These negative labels are often reproduced in Javanese Islam studies to this day. This article argues that the negative labels in Javanese Islamic studies tend to be misrepresentative. These kinds of results cannot be separated from certain paradigms in religious studies. There are two paradigms in the study of religion which are discussed in this article. First, the world religion paradigm. This paradigm, consciously or not, is often used in Javanese Islamic studies. The implication is Javanese religious practices are often portrayed as animist, syncretic, and so on. Second, the indigenous religion paradigm. This article elaborates this paradigm because of its potential in understanding Javanese Islamic religious practice more properly. The basis of this paradigm is intersubjective relation with ethical commitment, responsibility, and reciprocity.","PeriodicalId":29648,"journal":{"name":"Dinamika Penelitian Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REVISITING JAVANESE ISLAM\",\"authors\":\"Gedong Maulana Kabir\",\"doi\":\"10.21274/dinamika.2021.21.02.315-330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article tends to revisiting Javanese Islamic studies. This study began from the European travelers’ period who noted some aspects of society such as the religious life. Those notes show the negative label that is addressed to the Javanese religious practices. These negative labels are often reproduced in Javanese Islam studies to this day. This article argues that the negative labels in Javanese Islamic studies tend to be misrepresentative. These kinds of results cannot be separated from certain paradigms in religious studies. There are two paradigms in the study of religion which are discussed in this article. First, the world religion paradigm. This paradigm, consciously or not, is often used in Javanese Islamic studies. The implication is Javanese religious practices are often portrayed as animist, syncretic, and so on. Second, the indigenous religion paradigm. This article elaborates this paradigm because of its potential in understanding Javanese Islamic religious practice more properly. The basis of this paradigm is intersubjective relation with ethical commitment, responsibility, and reciprocity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dinamika Penelitian Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dinamika Penelitian Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21274/dinamika.2021.21.02.315-330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dinamika Penelitian Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21274/dinamika.2021.21.02.315-330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章倾向于重新审视爪哇的伊斯兰研究。这一研究开始于欧洲旅行者时期,他们关注社会的某些方面,如宗教生活。这些笔记显示了爪哇宗教活动的负面标签。这些负面的标签在爪哇伊斯兰教研究中经常重复出现。本文认为,爪哇伊斯兰研究中的负面标签往往具有误导性。这些结果与宗教研究中的某些范式是分不开的。本文讨论了宗教研究中的两种范式。第一,世界宗教范式。这种范式,有意无意地,经常被用于爪哇伊斯兰教研究。言下之意是爪哇人的宗教活动经常被描绘成万物有灵论、融合等等。第二,本土宗教范式。本文详细阐述了这一范式,因为它有可能更正确地理解爪哇伊斯兰教的宗教实践。这种范式的基础是主体间关系与伦理承诺、责任和互惠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
REVISITING JAVANESE ISLAM
This article tends to revisiting Javanese Islamic studies. This study began from the European travelers’ period who noted some aspects of society such as the religious life. Those notes show the negative label that is addressed to the Javanese religious practices. These negative labels are often reproduced in Javanese Islam studies to this day. This article argues that the negative labels in Javanese Islamic studies tend to be misrepresentative. These kinds of results cannot be separated from certain paradigms in religious studies. There are two paradigms in the study of religion which are discussed in this article. First, the world religion paradigm. This paradigm, consciously or not, is often used in Javanese Islamic studies. The implication is Javanese religious practices are often portrayed as animist, syncretic, and so on. Second, the indigenous religion paradigm. This article elaborates this paradigm because of its potential in understanding Javanese Islamic religious practice more properly. The basis of this paradigm is intersubjective relation with ethical commitment, responsibility, and reciprocity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊最新文献
MODEL GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN TRANSFORMATIF DALAM MENINGKATKAN DAYA SAING PENDIDIKAN DI ERA INDUSTRI 4.0 REPOSISI PERAN SUTRADARA DALAM MANAJEMEN PRODUKSI PROGRAM TELEVISI DI INDONESIA RELASI AGAMA, MEDIA DAN NARASI MODERASI BERAGAMA PADA GENERASI Z DI TULUNGAGUNG Komunikasi Spiritual Jurnalis: Alternative Activity Liputan Saat Pandemi KELOMPOK ISLAM NURCU DAN NEGARA: PENERIMAAN MUSLIM ATAS SEKULARISME
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1