“有机脾气”和新石器时代早期的陶器生产:解释性挑战

IF 0.4 4区 文学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY ACTA ARCHAEOLOGICA Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0390.2020.12228.x
Tanya Dzhanfezova
{"title":"“有机脾气”和新石器时代早期的陶器生产:解释性挑战","authors":"Tanya Dzhanfezova","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0390.2020.12228.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the hallmarks of the Early Neolithic pottery production at many sites along the Eurasian Neolithisation trajectories (e.g. Todorova & Vaysov 1993; Elenski 2006; Özdoğan 2011; Çilingiroğlu 2012; Vuković 2016). The hidden potential of this archaeobotanical inclusion (see Kreiter et al. 2013; 2014; Pető & Vrydaghs 2016; Mariotti Lippi & Pallecchi 2016) lies in revealing the interplay between two fundamental aspects, which defi ne the Southeast European Early Neolithic – the agricultural (farming/crop husbandry) and the technological cycle (pottery production) – integrated locally, within a settlement-specifi c environment. To explore this, however, it is essential to establish whether the vegetal remains are those of cultivated crops (cereal plant parts), as well as whether their presence in the fabrics plausibly refl ects the intentional addition of organic materials to the clay paste as temper, rather than incidental inclusion. Thus, the article is focused on these two main questions, rather than examining all possible research avenues in detail (see Fig. 1). Based on the contrasting preliminary results obtained from three Early Neolithic Eastern Balkan key study sites, located in present-day Romania and Bulgaria (Fig. 2), this study explores a series of challenges and potential biases when interpreting such vegetal remains in the Early Neolithic context. Temper, as a pottery-making component that refl ects shared values incorporated in technological activity (e.g. Stark et al. 2000), is traditionally studied from the perspective of fabric variation, to help outline cultural group membership and classify ware types (Rice 1987, 406). Here, a range of plant inclusion variables is considered with an aim to diff erentiate between the intentional adABSTRACT Well-preserved plant remains found in clay bodies of Early Neolithic pottery of Southeastern Europe have been largely understudied. The characteristics and provenance of this ‘organic temper’ remain mostly unknown, making interpretations obscure. Based on a range of research methods, this article explores the macro and micro plant remains within the pottery clays, considering such aspects as the use of domesticated versus wild plants and actual functional temper versus organic inclusions as background noise. This innovative approach is applied to explore three diff erent Early Neolithic Balkan sites, demonstrating the importance in distinguishing between (a) deliberate addition of selected temper as a technological prerequisite; (b) sporadic occurrence of plant parts in (domestic) areas where pottery was made, (c) natural characteristics of the local clays containing organics and used as raw materials, and (d) plant use pointing towards more specifi c pottery-making techniques. Possible misinterpretations and pitfalls are discussed in using the applied integrated methodology, thus revealing crucial details on the variability of the technological approaches applied during the Early Neolithic of Southeastern Europe.","PeriodicalId":44857,"journal":{"name":"ACTA ARCHAEOLOGICA","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1600-0390.2020.12228.x","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘ORGANIC TEMPER’ AND THE EARLY NEOLITHIC POTTERY PRODUCTION: INTERPRETATIONAL CHALLENGES\",\"authors\":\"Tanya Dzhanfezova\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1600-0390.2020.12228.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the hallmarks of the Early Neolithic pottery production at many sites along the Eurasian Neolithisation trajectories (e.g. Todorova & Vaysov 1993; Elenski 2006; Özdoğan 2011; Çilingiroğlu 2012; Vuković 2016). The hidden potential of this archaeobotanical inclusion (see Kreiter et al. 2013; 2014; Pető & Vrydaghs 2016; Mariotti Lippi & Pallecchi 2016) lies in revealing the interplay between two fundamental aspects, which defi ne the Southeast European Early Neolithic – the agricultural (farming/crop husbandry) and the technological cycle (pottery production) – integrated locally, within a settlement-specifi c environment. To explore this, however, it is essential to establish whether the vegetal remains are those of cultivated crops (cereal plant parts), as well as whether their presence in the fabrics plausibly refl ects the intentional addition of organic materials to the clay paste as temper, rather than incidental inclusion. Thus, the article is focused on these two main questions, rather than examining all possible research avenues in detail (see Fig. 1). Based on the contrasting preliminary results obtained from three Early Neolithic Eastern Balkan key study sites, located in present-day Romania and Bulgaria (Fig. 2), this study explores a series of challenges and potential biases when interpreting such vegetal remains in the Early Neolithic context. Temper, as a pottery-making component that refl ects shared values incorporated in technological activity (e.g. Stark et al. 2000), is traditionally studied from the perspective of fabric variation, to help outline cultural group membership and classify ware types (Rice 1987, 406). Here, a range of plant inclusion variables is considered with an aim to diff erentiate between the intentional adABSTRACT Well-preserved plant remains found in clay bodies of Early Neolithic pottery of Southeastern Europe have been largely understudied. The characteristics and provenance of this ‘organic temper’ remain mostly unknown, making interpretations obscure. Based on a range of research methods, this article explores the macro and micro plant remains within the pottery clays, considering such aspects as the use of domesticated versus wild plants and actual functional temper versus organic inclusions as background noise. This innovative approach is applied to explore three diff erent Early Neolithic Balkan sites, demonstrating the importance in distinguishing between (a) deliberate addition of selected temper as a technological prerequisite; (b) sporadic occurrence of plant parts in (domestic) areas where pottery was made, (c) natural characteristics of the local clays containing organics and used as raw materials, and (d) plant use pointing towards more specifi c pottery-making techniques. Possible misinterpretations and pitfalls are discussed in using the applied integrated methodology, thus revealing crucial details on the variability of the technological approaches applied during the Early Neolithic of Southeastern Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACTA ARCHAEOLOGICA\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1600-0390.2020.12228.x\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACTA ARCHAEOLOGICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0390.2020.12228.x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACTA ARCHAEOLOGICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0390.2020.12228.x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

欧亚新石器时代轨迹上许多遗址的新石器时代早期陶器生产的特征(例如Todorova和Vaysov 1993;Elenski 2006;Özdoğan 2011;Çilingiroğlu 2012;Vuković2016)。这种古植物包容性的隐藏潜力(见Kreiter et al.2013;2014;Petõ&Vrydaghs 2016;Mariotti Lippi和Pallecchi 2016)在于揭示了两个基本方面之间的相互作用,这两个方面定义了东南欧新石器时代早期——农业(农业/作物饲养)和技术循环(陶器生产)——在当地整合,在定居点特定的环境中。然而,为了探索这一点,有必要确定植物遗骸是否是栽培作物(谷物植物部分)的植物遗骸,以及它们在织物中的存在是否合理地反映了有意将有机材料添加到粘土浆中作为调和剂,而不是偶然包含。因此,本文专注于这两个主要问题,而不是详细研究所有可能的研究途径(见图1)。基于从位于今天罗马尼亚和保加利亚的三个新石器时代早期东巴尔干关键研究遗址获得的对比初步结果(图2),本研究探讨了在新石器时代初期解释此类植物遗骸时的一系列挑战和潜在偏见。回火作为一种反映技术活动中共同价值观的陶器制造组件(例如Stark等人,2000年),传统上从织物变化的角度进行研究,以帮助概述文化群体成员关系并对陶器类型进行分类(Rice 1987406)。在这里,考虑了一系列植物内含物变量,目的是区分有意的和抽象的。在东南欧新石器时代早期陶器的粘土体中发现的保存完好的植物遗骸在很大程度上没有得到充分的研究。这种“有机脾气”的特征和来源大多不为人知,使得解释变得模糊不清。本文基于一系列研究方法,从驯化植物与野生植物的使用、实际功能状态与有机内含物作为背景噪声等方面,探讨了陶粘土中的宏观和微观植物遗迹。这一创新方法被应用于探索三个不同的新石器时代早期巴尔干遗址,证明了区分(a)故意添加选定的回火作为技术先决条件的重要性;(b) 在(国内)制陶地区偶尔出现植物部分,(c)当地含有有机物并用作原材料的粘土的自然特征,以及(d)指向更具体的制陶技术的植物使用。在使用应用综合方法论时,讨论了可能的误解和陷阱,从而揭示了东南欧新石器时代早期应用的技术方法可变性的关键细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘ORGANIC TEMPER’ AND THE EARLY NEOLITHIC POTTERY PRODUCTION: INTERPRETATIONAL CHALLENGES
the hallmarks of the Early Neolithic pottery production at many sites along the Eurasian Neolithisation trajectories (e.g. Todorova & Vaysov 1993; Elenski 2006; Özdoğan 2011; Çilingiroğlu 2012; Vuković 2016). The hidden potential of this archaeobotanical inclusion (see Kreiter et al. 2013; 2014; Pető & Vrydaghs 2016; Mariotti Lippi & Pallecchi 2016) lies in revealing the interplay between two fundamental aspects, which defi ne the Southeast European Early Neolithic – the agricultural (farming/crop husbandry) and the technological cycle (pottery production) – integrated locally, within a settlement-specifi c environment. To explore this, however, it is essential to establish whether the vegetal remains are those of cultivated crops (cereal plant parts), as well as whether their presence in the fabrics plausibly refl ects the intentional addition of organic materials to the clay paste as temper, rather than incidental inclusion. Thus, the article is focused on these two main questions, rather than examining all possible research avenues in detail (see Fig. 1). Based on the contrasting preliminary results obtained from three Early Neolithic Eastern Balkan key study sites, located in present-day Romania and Bulgaria (Fig. 2), this study explores a series of challenges and potential biases when interpreting such vegetal remains in the Early Neolithic context. Temper, as a pottery-making component that refl ects shared values incorporated in technological activity (e.g. Stark et al. 2000), is traditionally studied from the perspective of fabric variation, to help outline cultural group membership and classify ware types (Rice 1987, 406). Here, a range of plant inclusion variables is considered with an aim to diff erentiate between the intentional adABSTRACT Well-preserved plant remains found in clay bodies of Early Neolithic pottery of Southeastern Europe have been largely understudied. The characteristics and provenance of this ‘organic temper’ remain mostly unknown, making interpretations obscure. Based on a range of research methods, this article explores the macro and micro plant remains within the pottery clays, considering such aspects as the use of domesticated versus wild plants and actual functional temper versus organic inclusions as background noise. This innovative approach is applied to explore three diff erent Early Neolithic Balkan sites, demonstrating the importance in distinguishing between (a) deliberate addition of selected temper as a technological prerequisite; (b) sporadic occurrence of plant parts in (domestic) areas where pottery was made, (c) natural characteristics of the local clays containing organics and used as raw materials, and (d) plant use pointing towards more specifi c pottery-making techniques. Possible misinterpretations and pitfalls are discussed in using the applied integrated methodology, thus revealing crucial details on the variability of the technological approaches applied during the Early Neolithic of Southeastern Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACTA ARCHAEOLOGICA
ACTA ARCHAEOLOGICA ARCHAEOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Acta Archaeologica, founded in 1930, is the leading scientific international archaeological periodical in Scandinavia. Acta Archaeologica is published annually and contains 200 to 250 large pages, beautifully illustrated. The papers are in English, German, French, or Italian, well-edited, and of lasting value. Acta Archaeologica covers the archaeology of Scandinavia, including the North Atlantic, until about 1500 AD. At the same time, Acta Archaeologica is underscoring the position of Northern Europe in its wider continental context. Mediterranean (and Near Eastern) archaeology plays a particular role. Contributions from arctic, maritime and other branches of archaeology, as well as from other continents, are included.
期刊最新文献
Køge 2. A Clinker-built Shipwreck from the Medieval Harbour of Køge, Zealand, Denmark Interim Report on Gribshunden (1495) Excavations: 2019–2021 Managing Data from Maritime Archaeology Investigations: AIR at Gribshunden Apollo and Maria: Two 17th-Century Warships Found at Vaxholm, Sweden Creating Order or Revealing Disorder? Some Preliminary Results Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) in Studying Archaeological Boat Finds from Norway (AD 1050–1700)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1