{"title":"忧郁如风景:本杰明,帕慕克,塞博尔德,斯雷雅","authors":"J. Alvizu","doi":"10.5325/complitstudies.60.2.0336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article locates the work of Walter Benjamin, Orhan Pamuk, W. G. Sebald, and Cemal Süreya in a minor tradition of writers preoccupied with melancholy since the Baroque. By pushing the notion of melancholy outside the experience of the individual subject, melancholy can be understood beyond its inherited descriptions, which treat it either as an impetus for artistic creativity or as a medical condition. Instead, drawing on work in global modernist studies and ecocriticism, melancholy can be productively considered relationally and nonanthropocentrically. This article traces how in İstanbul: Hatıralar ve Şehir (Istanbul: Memories and the City), Pamuk, channeling strands of Islamic melancholy (ḥuzn), closely links the Turkish notion of hüzün (Turkish melancholy) to landscape (manzara), which notably troubles the human–nonhuman divide. Then it will be shown how Sebald's lamentations on destruction and the ruinated landscape in his poetry and the novel Die Ringe des Saturn (Rings of Saturn) both collapse distinctions between nature and culture and articulate a melancholy at the extremes of visual perception. In closing, a reading of Cemal Süreya's poem \"Fotoğraf\" (\"Photograph\") brings the work of all three authors together under the notion of a promising and critical \"melancholy present.\"","PeriodicalId":55969,"journal":{"name":"COMPARATIVE LITERATURE STUDIES","volume":"60 1","pages":"336 - 373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Melancholy as Landscape: Benjamin, Pamuk, Sebald, Süreya\",\"authors\":\"J. Alvizu\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/complitstudies.60.2.0336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This article locates the work of Walter Benjamin, Orhan Pamuk, W. G. Sebald, and Cemal Süreya in a minor tradition of writers preoccupied with melancholy since the Baroque. By pushing the notion of melancholy outside the experience of the individual subject, melancholy can be understood beyond its inherited descriptions, which treat it either as an impetus for artistic creativity or as a medical condition. Instead, drawing on work in global modernist studies and ecocriticism, melancholy can be productively considered relationally and nonanthropocentrically. This article traces how in İstanbul: Hatıralar ve Şehir (Istanbul: Memories and the City), Pamuk, channeling strands of Islamic melancholy (ḥuzn), closely links the Turkish notion of hüzün (Turkish melancholy) to landscape (manzara), which notably troubles the human–nonhuman divide. Then it will be shown how Sebald's lamentations on destruction and the ruinated landscape in his poetry and the novel Die Ringe des Saturn (Rings of Saturn) both collapse distinctions between nature and culture and articulate a melancholy at the extremes of visual perception. In closing, a reading of Cemal Süreya's poem \\\"Fotoğraf\\\" (\\\"Photograph\\\") brings the work of all three authors together under the notion of a promising and critical \\\"melancholy present.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":55969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMPARATIVE LITERATURE STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"336 - 373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMPARATIVE LITERATURE STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/complitstudies.60.2.0336\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPARATIVE LITERATURE STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/complitstudies.60.2.0336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文将Walter Benjamin、Orhan Pamuk、w.g. Sebald和Cemal sastreya的作品定位于自巴洛克以来专注于忧郁的作家的小传统中。通过将忧郁的概念推到个体主体的经验之外,忧郁可以超越其继承的描述来理解,这些描述将其视为艺术创造力的动力或医疗状况。相反,借鉴全球现代主义研究和生态批评的工作,忧郁可以被有效地视为关系和非人类中心主义。本文追溯了在İstanbul: Hatıralar ve Şehir(伊斯坦布尔:记忆与城市)中,Pamuk如何引导伊斯兰忧郁的线索(ḥuzn),将土耳其的h z n(土耳其忧郁)概念与景观(manzara)紧密联系起来,后者明显困扰着人类与非人类的分歧。然后,我们将看到西博尔德在他的诗歌和小说《土星之环》中对破坏和被毁景观的哀叹是如何瓦解自然与文化之间的区别,并在视觉感知的极端下表达出一种忧郁。最后,阅读Cemal sreya的诗“Fotoğraf”(“照片”)将三位作者的作品在一个充满希望和批判性的“忧郁当下”的概念下结合在一起。
Melancholy as Landscape: Benjamin, Pamuk, Sebald, Süreya
abstract:This article locates the work of Walter Benjamin, Orhan Pamuk, W. G. Sebald, and Cemal Süreya in a minor tradition of writers preoccupied with melancholy since the Baroque. By pushing the notion of melancholy outside the experience of the individual subject, melancholy can be understood beyond its inherited descriptions, which treat it either as an impetus for artistic creativity or as a medical condition. Instead, drawing on work in global modernist studies and ecocriticism, melancholy can be productively considered relationally and nonanthropocentrically. This article traces how in İstanbul: Hatıralar ve Şehir (Istanbul: Memories and the City), Pamuk, channeling strands of Islamic melancholy (ḥuzn), closely links the Turkish notion of hüzün (Turkish melancholy) to landscape (manzara), which notably troubles the human–nonhuman divide. Then it will be shown how Sebald's lamentations on destruction and the ruinated landscape in his poetry and the novel Die Ringe des Saturn (Rings of Saturn) both collapse distinctions between nature and culture and articulate a melancholy at the extremes of visual perception. In closing, a reading of Cemal Süreya's poem "Fotoğraf" ("Photograph") brings the work of all three authors together under the notion of a promising and critical "melancholy present."
期刊介绍:
Comparative Literature Studies publishes comparative articles in literature and culture, critical theory, and cultural and literary relations within and beyond the Western tradition. It brings you the work of eminent critics, scholars, theorists, and literary historians, whose essays range across the rich traditions of Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. One of its regular issues every two years concerns East-West literary and cultural relations and is edited in conjunction with members of the College of International Relations at Nihon University. Each issue includes reviews of significant books by prominent comparatists.