Arvi Grotenfelt和新康德主义的历史哲学

L. Kallio
{"title":"Arvi Grotenfelt和新康德主义的历史哲学","authors":"L. Kallio","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.3864911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses Arvi Grotenfelt's (1863 – 1941), professor of philosophy in Helsinki 1905 – 29, reading of Heinrich Rickert's (1863 – 1936) philosophy of history. Rickert was one of the key figures of the so-called south-west German neo-Kantianism. In the center of attention of the south- west neo-Kantians was the topic that Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) himself had omitted: how to philosophically establish the humanities and the social sciences and separate them from the natural sciences? Rickert's philosophy of history was essentially an attempt to ground the historical knowledge in a strictly transcendental philosophy in the Kantian sense. His argumentation relied on his concept of value (Wert). Grotenfelt did not share Rickert's definition of values. According to his view, the fundamental foundation of our judgements of value is beyond scientific reasoning. I will also argue that Grotenfelt's standpoint has a general affinity to Wilhelm Dilthey's (1833 – 1911) philosophy of world view (Weltanschauung).","PeriodicalId":41959,"journal":{"name":"Con-textos Kantianos-International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":"336-351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arvi Grotenfelt and neo-Kantian philosophy of history\",\"authors\":\"L. Kallio\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.3864911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper discusses Arvi Grotenfelt's (1863 – 1941), professor of philosophy in Helsinki 1905 – 29, reading of Heinrich Rickert's (1863 – 1936) philosophy of history. Rickert was one of the key figures of the so-called south-west German neo-Kantianism. In the center of attention of the south- west neo-Kantians was the topic that Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) himself had omitted: how to philosophically establish the humanities and the social sciences and separate them from the natural sciences? Rickert's philosophy of history was essentially an attempt to ground the historical knowledge in a strictly transcendental philosophy in the Kantian sense. His argumentation relied on his concept of value (Wert). Grotenfelt did not share Rickert's definition of values. According to his view, the fundamental foundation of our judgements of value is beyond scientific reasoning. I will also argue that Grotenfelt's standpoint has a general affinity to Wilhelm Dilthey's (1833 – 1911) philosophy of world view (Weltanschauung).\",\"PeriodicalId\":41959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Con-textos Kantianos-International Journal of Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"336-351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Con-textos Kantianos-International Journal of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3864911\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Con-textos Kantianos-International Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3864911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了1905 - 29年赫尔辛基哲学教授阿尔维·格罗滕费尔特(1863 - 1941)对海因里希·里克尔特(1863 - 1936)历史哲学的阅读。里克特是所谓德国西南新康德主义的关键人物之一。西南新康德主义者关注的中心是伊曼努尔·康德(1724 - 1804)自己忽略的话题:如何从哲学上建立人文科学和社会科学,并将它们与自然科学分开?里克特的历史哲学本质上是一种将历史知识建立在康德意义上的严格先验哲学基础上的尝试。他的论证依赖于他的价值观念。格罗滕费尔特并不认同里克特对价值的定义。根据他的观点,我们判断价值的根本基础是超越科学推理的。我还将论证格罗滕费尔特的观点与威廉·狄尔泰(1833 - 1911)的世界观哲学(Weltanschauung)有着大致的相似之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Arvi Grotenfelt and neo-Kantian philosophy of history
The paper discusses Arvi Grotenfelt's (1863 – 1941), professor of philosophy in Helsinki 1905 – 29, reading of Heinrich Rickert's (1863 – 1936) philosophy of history. Rickert was one of the key figures of the so-called south-west German neo-Kantianism. In the center of attention of the south- west neo-Kantians was the topic that Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) himself had omitted: how to philosophically establish the humanities and the social sciences and separate them from the natural sciences? Rickert's philosophy of history was essentially an attempt to ground the historical knowledge in a strictly transcendental philosophy in the Kantian sense. His argumentation relied on his concept of value (Wert). Grotenfelt did not share Rickert's definition of values. According to his view, the fundamental foundation of our judgements of value is beyond scientific reasoning. I will also argue that Grotenfelt's standpoint has a general affinity to Wilhelm Dilthey's (1833 – 1911) philosophy of world view (Weltanschauung).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Con-Textos Kantianos aims at boosting the philological and critical research on Kant studies, considering also actual discussions on Kant''s thought. That is the reason why its heading hints to contexts with texts. Kant shall be the main focus of the journal, which will tackle subjects such as Moral and Political Philosophy, History of Ideas, Philosophy of Right, Philosophy of History, Philosophy of Religion, Philosophy of Education, Aesthetics, Anthropology, Metaphysics and Epistemology, Human Rights, Social Policy, Theories of Justice and Cosmopolitanism. CTK aims at being an international and cosmopolitan inspired e-journal, where the Spanish language receives equal acknowledgement as English, French, German, Italian and Portuguese do. The main purposes of the journal are to enhance the development of a Kant scholarship network at the Latin American scale and to tighten the links between research groups already consolidated in different countries and languages. The editorial team, which gathers Kant scholars from Argentina, Colombia, Chile, Mexico and Spain, will certainly ease the fulfillment of both purposes.
期刊最新文献
Philosophy in cosmic sense and human reason in Kant Genialidad ilustrada Vida mental sin conceptos y cognición animal en Kant Kant und das Projekt der Aufklärung heute Pasear al filo del sentido. Recuerdo de Paulo Tunhas (1960-2023)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1