针刺联合患者自主镇痛治疗背部手术后急性疼痛的疗效:一项meta分析

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2022-10-07 DOI:10.1155/2022/2551591
Dalin Deng, Feng Xu, Ya-Fei Wang, Lulin Ma, Tianhao Zhang, Wenjing Zhao, Xiangdong Chen
{"title":"针刺联合患者自主镇痛治疗背部手术后急性疼痛的疗效:一项meta分析","authors":"Dalin Deng, Feng Xu, Ya-Fei Wang, Lulin Ma, Tianhao Zhang, Wenjing Zhao, Xiangdong Chen","doi":"10.1155/2022/2551591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. Acupuncture is used worldwide to relieve both acute and chronic pain. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is also frequently used for postoperative pain relief. However, there are few meta-analyses of the efficacy of acupuncture with PCA in reducing acute postoperative pain. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture with PCA in relieving acute pain after back surgery. Methods. We searched seven databases (Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, Chongqing VIP (VIP), and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM)-from 1949 until now) without language restrictions for randomized controlled trials, including patients undergoing back surgery and receiving PCA alone or treated with acupuncture/sham acupuncture + PCA for pain relief. This meta-analysis assessed pain intensity, with visual analogue scale (VAS) score and postoperative opioid dosage as primary outcomes. Results. A total of 12 randomized controlled trials (n = 904) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the control group (standard mean difference (SMD) = ‒0.42, 95% CI = ‒0.60 to ‒0.25, \n \n P\n <\n 0.01\n \n ) or sham acupuncture + PCA (SMD = ‒0.7, 95% CI = ‒0.94 to ‒0.46, \n \n P\n <\n 0.01\n \n ), acupuncture + PCA treatment reduced the VAS score in patients after back surgery. Acupuncture + PCA decreased the use of opioids after surgery compared to sham acupuncture + PCA (SMD = −0.35, 95% CI = ‒0.63 to ‒0.07, \n \n P\n =\n 0.01\n \n ) or control group (SMD = ‒0.82, 95% CI = ‒1.03 to ‒0.61, \n \n P\n <\n 0.01\n \n ). Furthermore, the use of acupuncture with PCA reduced the incidence of postoperative PCA-related total complications (odds ratio = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.85, \n \n P\n =\n 0.01\n \n ), but may not reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (odds ratio =0.82 , 95% CI =0.49 to 1.36, \n \n P\n =\n 0.44\n \n ). Conclusion. This systematic review found that acupuncture with PCA relieved acute pain after back surgery more effectively than PCA alone and could reduce opioid use and the incidence of postoperative PCA-related total complications","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Acupuncture Combined with Patient-Controlled Analgesia in the Treatment of Acute Pain after Back Surgery: A Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Dalin Deng, Feng Xu, Ya-Fei Wang, Lulin Ma, Tianhao Zhang, Wenjing Zhao, Xiangdong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/2551591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives. Acupuncture is used worldwide to relieve both acute and chronic pain. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is also frequently used for postoperative pain relief. However, there are few meta-analyses of the efficacy of acupuncture with PCA in reducing acute postoperative pain. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture with PCA in relieving acute pain after back surgery. Methods. We searched seven databases (Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, Chongqing VIP (VIP), and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM)-from 1949 until now) without language restrictions for randomized controlled trials, including patients undergoing back surgery and receiving PCA alone or treated with acupuncture/sham acupuncture + PCA for pain relief. This meta-analysis assessed pain intensity, with visual analogue scale (VAS) score and postoperative opioid dosage as primary outcomes. Results. A total of 12 randomized controlled trials (n = 904) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the control group (standard mean difference (SMD) = ‒0.42, 95% CI = ‒0.60 to ‒0.25, \\n \\n P\\n <\\n 0.01\\n \\n ) or sham acupuncture + PCA (SMD = ‒0.7, 95% CI = ‒0.94 to ‒0.46, \\n \\n P\\n <\\n 0.01\\n \\n ), acupuncture + PCA treatment reduced the VAS score in patients after back surgery. Acupuncture + PCA decreased the use of opioids after surgery compared to sham acupuncture + PCA (SMD = −0.35, 95% CI = ‒0.63 to ‒0.07, \\n \\n P\\n =\\n 0.01\\n \\n ) or control group (SMD = ‒0.82, 95% CI = ‒1.03 to ‒0.61, \\n \\n P\\n <\\n 0.01\\n \\n ). Furthermore, the use of acupuncture with PCA reduced the incidence of postoperative PCA-related total complications (odds ratio = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.85, \\n \\n P\\n =\\n 0.01\\n \\n ), but may not reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (odds ratio =0.82 , 95% CI =0.49 to 1.36, \\n \\n P\\n =\\n 0.44\\n \\n ). Conclusion. This systematic review found that acupuncture with PCA relieved acute pain after back surgery more effectively than PCA alone and could reduce opioid use and the incidence of postoperative PCA-related total complications\",\"PeriodicalId\":19913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2551591\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2551591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。针灸在世界范围内被用于缓解急性和慢性疼痛。患者自控镇痛(PCA)也常用于术后疼痛缓解。然而,很少有关于针灸配合PCA减轻术后急性疼痛的meta分析。本荟萃分析旨在评估针刺配合PCA缓解背部手术后急性疼痛的有效性。方法。我们检索了七个数据库(Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed,中国知网(CNKI),万方数据库,重庆VIP (VIP)和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)-从1949年至今),没有语言限制,用于随机对照试验,包括接受背部手术并单独接受PCA或针灸/假针灸+ PCA治疗的疼痛缓解患者。该荟萃分析评估疼痛强度,以视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分和术后阿片类药物剂量作为主要结果。结果。共有12项随机对照试验(n = 904)符合纳入标准。与对照组(SMD = -0.42, 95% CI = -0.60 ~ -0.25, P < 0.01)或假针+ PCA组(SMD = -0.7, 95% CI = -0.94 ~ -0.46, P < 0.01)相比,针刺+ PCA治疗降低了背部手术后患者的VAS评分。与假针+ PCA组(SMD = - 0.35, 95% CI = -0.63 ~ -0.07, P = 0.01)或对照组(SMD = -0.82, 95% CI = -1.03 ~ -0.61, P < 0.01)相比,针刺+ PCA组术后阿片类药物使用减少。此外,针刺合并PCA降低了术后PCA相关总并发症的发生率(优势比= 0.44,95% CI = 0.23 ~ 0.85, P = 0.01),但可能不会降低术后恶心和呕吐的发生率(优势比=0.82,95% CI =0.49 ~ 1.36, P = 0.44)。结论。本系统综述发现,针灸联合PCA比单独PCA更有效地缓解背部手术后急性疼痛,并可减少阿片类药物的使用和术后PCA相关总并发症的发生率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Acupuncture Combined with Patient-Controlled Analgesia in the Treatment of Acute Pain after Back Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
Objectives. Acupuncture is used worldwide to relieve both acute and chronic pain. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is also frequently used for postoperative pain relief. However, there are few meta-analyses of the efficacy of acupuncture with PCA in reducing acute postoperative pain. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture with PCA in relieving acute pain after back surgery. Methods. We searched seven databases (Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, Chongqing VIP (VIP), and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM)-from 1949 until now) without language restrictions for randomized controlled trials, including patients undergoing back surgery and receiving PCA alone or treated with acupuncture/sham acupuncture + PCA for pain relief. This meta-analysis assessed pain intensity, with visual analogue scale (VAS) score and postoperative opioid dosage as primary outcomes. Results. A total of 12 randomized controlled trials (n = 904) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the control group (standard mean difference (SMD) = ‒0.42, 95% CI = ‒0.60 to ‒0.25, P < 0.01 ) or sham acupuncture + PCA (SMD = ‒0.7, 95% CI = ‒0.94 to ‒0.46, P < 0.01 ), acupuncture + PCA treatment reduced the VAS score in patients after back surgery. Acupuncture + PCA decreased the use of opioids after surgery compared to sham acupuncture + PCA (SMD = −0.35, 95% CI = ‒0.63 to ‒0.07, P = 0.01 ) or control group (SMD = ‒0.82, 95% CI = ‒1.03 to ‒0.61, P < 0.01 ). Furthermore, the use of acupuncture with PCA reduced the incidence of postoperative PCA-related total complications (odds ratio = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.85, P = 0.01 ), but may not reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (odds ratio =0.82 , 95% CI =0.49 to 1.36, P = 0.44 ). Conclusion. This systematic review found that acupuncture with PCA relieved acute pain after back surgery more effectively than PCA alone and could reduce opioid use and the incidence of postoperative PCA-related total complications
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring Everyday Upper Extremity Function in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Secondary, Retrospective Analysis from ncRNAPain. Assessment of Clinical Analgesic Levels and Serum Biomarkers in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Diclofenac and Methotrexate Combined Therapy with Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy. Potential S1 Nerve Root Blocks Associated with Sacroiliac Joint Injections. Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Pain Resilience Scale among Lebanese Adults with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Exploring the Analgesic Initiation Mechanism of Tuina in the Dorsal Root Ganglion of Minor CCI Rats via the TRPV1/TRPA1-cGMP Pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1