东京的台湾难题:日本能做些什么来防止战争?

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Washington Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/0163660X.2022.2127881
M. Mochizuki
{"title":"东京的台湾难题:日本能做些什么来防止战争?","authors":"M. Mochizuki","doi":"10.1080/0163660X.2022.2127881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s August 2022 visit to Taiwan, Chinese missile firings, with some landing in Japan’s claimed exclusive economic zone (EEZ), vividly confirmed for many Japanese the notion that “a Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency.” Even before this latest flareup in tensions across the Taiwan Strait, Japanese officials and defense analysts were increasingly focused on how a military crisis over Taiwan could embroil Japan. Japan confronts a strategic conundrum regarding the Taiwan question. It prefers the status quo of Taiwan maintaining political autonomy, and it wants to avoid a cross-strait war that would be catastrophic for Japan. But this status quo is becoming more precarious, and Tokyo faces vexing dilemmas in fashioning a policy to prevent a war over Taiwan. Geographic location makes Japan a pivotal actor in a Taiwan contingency; and as a consequence, it is virtually impossible to avoid becoming involved either as a military target or as a military asset. Given its reliance on the United States for security, Tokyo has to deal with the classic alliance dilemma between abandonment and entrapment. But domestic constitutional, legal and political constraints make it difficult for Japan to become a great power in a traditional sense and thereby liberate itself from this alliance dilemma. And in the","PeriodicalId":46957,"journal":{"name":"Washington Quarterly","volume":"45 1","pages":"81 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tokyo’s Taiwan Conundrum: What Can Japan Do to Prevent War?\",\"authors\":\"M. Mochizuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0163660X.2022.2127881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In response to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s August 2022 visit to Taiwan, Chinese missile firings, with some landing in Japan’s claimed exclusive economic zone (EEZ), vividly confirmed for many Japanese the notion that “a Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency.” Even before this latest flareup in tensions across the Taiwan Strait, Japanese officials and defense analysts were increasingly focused on how a military crisis over Taiwan could embroil Japan. Japan confronts a strategic conundrum regarding the Taiwan question. It prefers the status quo of Taiwan maintaining political autonomy, and it wants to avoid a cross-strait war that would be catastrophic for Japan. But this status quo is becoming more precarious, and Tokyo faces vexing dilemmas in fashioning a policy to prevent a war over Taiwan. Geographic location makes Japan a pivotal actor in a Taiwan contingency; and as a consequence, it is virtually impossible to avoid becoming involved either as a military target or as a military asset. Given its reliance on the United States for security, Tokyo has to deal with the classic alliance dilemma between abandonment and entrapment. But domestic constitutional, legal and political constraints make it difficult for Japan to become a great power in a traditional sense and thereby liberate itself from this alliance dilemma. And in the\",\"PeriodicalId\":46957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Washington Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"81 - 107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Washington Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2022.2127881\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Washington Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2022.2127881","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作为对众议院议长南希·佩洛西(Nancy Pelosi) 2022年8月访问台湾的回应,中国发射的导弹,其中一些落在了日本声称的专属经济区(EEZ),生动地证实了许多日本人的观念,即“台湾的突发事件就是日本的突发事件”。甚至在台湾海峡紧张局势最近升级之前,日本官员和防务分析人士就越来越关注台湾军事危机会如何将日本卷入其中。日本在台湾问题上面临着一个战略难题。它更希望台湾保持政治自治的现状,并希望避免对日本来说是灾难性的两岸战争。但这种现状正变得越来越不稳定,东京在制定防止台湾战争的政策方面面临着令人烦恼的两难境地。地理位置使日本成为台湾偶发事件中的关键角色;因此,无论是作为军事目标还是作为军事资产,几乎不可能避免卷入其中。考虑到日本在安全上对美国的依赖,日本必须应对传统的同盟困境,要么放弃,要么陷入困境。但国内的宪法、法律和政治制约,使日本难以成为传统意义上的大国,从而摆脱这种同盟困境。在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tokyo’s Taiwan Conundrum: What Can Japan Do to Prevent War?
In response to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s August 2022 visit to Taiwan, Chinese missile firings, with some landing in Japan’s claimed exclusive economic zone (EEZ), vividly confirmed for many Japanese the notion that “a Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency.” Even before this latest flareup in tensions across the Taiwan Strait, Japanese officials and defense analysts were increasingly focused on how a military crisis over Taiwan could embroil Japan. Japan confronts a strategic conundrum regarding the Taiwan question. It prefers the status quo of Taiwan maintaining political autonomy, and it wants to avoid a cross-strait war that would be catastrophic for Japan. But this status quo is becoming more precarious, and Tokyo faces vexing dilemmas in fashioning a policy to prevent a war over Taiwan. Geographic location makes Japan a pivotal actor in a Taiwan contingency; and as a consequence, it is virtually impossible to avoid becoming involved either as a military target or as a military asset. Given its reliance on the United States for security, Tokyo has to deal with the classic alliance dilemma between abandonment and entrapment. But domestic constitutional, legal and political constraints make it difficult for Japan to become a great power in a traditional sense and thereby liberate itself from this alliance dilemma. And in the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Washington Quarterly (TWQ) is a journal of global affairs that analyzes strategic security challenges, changes, and their public policy implications. TWQ is published out of one of the world"s preeminent international policy institutions, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and addresses topics such as: •The U.S. role in the world •Emerging great powers: Europe, China, Russia, India, and Japan •Regional issues and flashpoints, particularly in the Middle East and Asia •Weapons of mass destruction proliferation and missile defenses •Global perspectives to reduce terrorism Contributors are drawn from outside as well as inside the United States and reflect diverse political, regional, and professional perspectives.
期刊最新文献
A Fragile Equilibrium: Incentivizing Pakistan’s Regional Recalibration Befuddled: How America Can Get Its Voice Back How Putin’s Regime Survivalism Drives Russian Aggression Carbon Time Machine Can South Korea Trust the United States?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1