香蕉(Musa spp.)地方作物生产实践的社会技术系统分析

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY Biological Agriculture & Horticulture Pub Date : 2018-08-02 DOI:10.1080/01448765.2018.1495575
A. Husain, M. Sundaramari
{"title":"香蕉(Musa spp.)地方作物生产实践的社会技术系统分析","authors":"A. Husain, M. Sundaramari","doi":"10.1080/01448765.2018.1495575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present study, undertaken in the state of Kerala, India, documented 111 Indigenous Crop Production Practices (ICPPs; traditional practices) for banana and most of the practices were registered in the technology dimensions of seeds and seedlings (19%), manuring (19%), and planting in main field (15%). Of the 111 practices, 35 were selected for analysis of rationality, and for knowledge and adoption among farmers. Of the 35 practices, 27 (77%) were rated as rational and the scientific rationale/operational principles were elucidated in the study, revealing a strong scientific base for these practices. The knowledge of and the adoption of these traditional practices by farmers was found to be good. The effectiveness of the practices, as perceived by the farmers who had adopted them, were analysed for 21 practices, and it was found that majority (86%) of the traditional practices for banana production were effective. The study revealed that many indigenous practices for banana were both rational and effective. These practices require urgent attention in order to integrate them with modern technologies, which in turn would promote sustainable crop production and maintenance of ecosystem integrity. Abbreviation: ITK: indigenous technical knowledge","PeriodicalId":8904,"journal":{"name":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","volume":"35 1","pages":"109 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01448765.2018.1495575","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socio-technical system analysis of indigenous crop production practices for banana (Musa spp.)\",\"authors\":\"A. Husain, M. Sundaramari\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01448765.2018.1495575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The present study, undertaken in the state of Kerala, India, documented 111 Indigenous Crop Production Practices (ICPPs; traditional practices) for banana and most of the practices were registered in the technology dimensions of seeds and seedlings (19%), manuring (19%), and planting in main field (15%). Of the 111 practices, 35 were selected for analysis of rationality, and for knowledge and adoption among farmers. Of the 35 practices, 27 (77%) were rated as rational and the scientific rationale/operational principles were elucidated in the study, revealing a strong scientific base for these practices. The knowledge of and the adoption of these traditional practices by farmers was found to be good. The effectiveness of the practices, as perceived by the farmers who had adopted them, were analysed for 21 practices, and it was found that majority (86%) of the traditional practices for banana production were effective. The study revealed that many indigenous practices for banana were both rational and effective. These practices require urgent attention in order to integrate them with modern technologies, which in turn would promote sustainable crop production and maintenance of ecosystem integrity. Abbreviation: ITK: indigenous technical knowledge\",\"PeriodicalId\":8904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"109 - 96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01448765.2018.1495575\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2018.1495575\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2018.1495575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究在印度喀拉拉邦进行,记录了111种香蕉本土作物生产实践(ICPP;传统实践),其中大多数实践在种子和幼苗(19%)、施肥(19%)和主田种植(15%)的技术维度上进行了登记。在111种做法中,选择了35种做法进行合理性分析,并在农民中进行了解和采用。在35种做法中,27种(77%)被评为合理做法,研究中阐明了科学原理/操作原则,为这些做法奠定了坚实的科学基础。农民对这些传统做法的了解和采用被认为是有益的。对采用这些做法的农民所认为的21种做法的有效性进行了分析,发现大多数(86%)香蕉生产的传统做法是有效的。研究表明,许多当地香蕉种植做法既合理又有效。这些做法需要紧急关注,以便将其与现代技术相结合,从而促进可持续的作物生产和生态系统完整性的维护。缩写:ITK:本土技术知识
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Socio-technical system analysis of indigenous crop production practices for banana (Musa spp.)
ABSTRACT The present study, undertaken in the state of Kerala, India, documented 111 Indigenous Crop Production Practices (ICPPs; traditional practices) for banana and most of the practices were registered in the technology dimensions of seeds and seedlings (19%), manuring (19%), and planting in main field (15%). Of the 111 practices, 35 were selected for analysis of rationality, and for knowledge and adoption among farmers. Of the 35 practices, 27 (77%) were rated as rational and the scientific rationale/operational principles were elucidated in the study, revealing a strong scientific base for these practices. The knowledge of and the adoption of these traditional practices by farmers was found to be good. The effectiveness of the practices, as perceived by the farmers who had adopted them, were analysed for 21 practices, and it was found that majority (86%) of the traditional practices for banana production were effective. The study revealed that many indigenous practices for banana were both rational and effective. These practices require urgent attention in order to integrate them with modern technologies, which in turn would promote sustainable crop production and maintenance of ecosystem integrity. Abbreviation: ITK: indigenous technical knowledge
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Agriculture & Horticulture
Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Agriculture & Horticulture aims to act as the central focus for a wide range of studies into alternative systems of husbandry, and particularly the biological or organic approach to food production. The Journal publishes work of a sound scientific or economic nature related to any aspect of biological husbandry in agriculture, horticulture and forestry in both temperate and tropical conditions, including energy and water utilization, and environmental impact.
期刊最新文献
Using Gliricidia sepium prunings as green manure in a degraded ultisol ; effect on soil physical properties and yield of okra (Abelmuschus esculentus) in Abakaliki, southeast Nigeria Effects of bio-fertiliser enriched organic amendments on flowering and fruiting behaviour, yield and quality attributes of Khasi mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) Differences in productivity and soil properties in rice-based cropping systems under long-term organic, integrated and conventional production Further evaluation of a new method to investigate antimicrobial, colour retainment and slice healing properties of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) shows differences between conventional and organic production systems in inter-laboratory comparison trials Effects of organic amendments, biofertilisers and biodynamic preparations on soil properties and leaf nutrient concentrations in grapevine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1