S. Heimans, G. Biesta, Keita Takayama, Margaret Kettle
{"title":"如何看待教学?对教师及其教育者在教育(非)意义产生中的作用提出质疑","authors":"S. Heimans, G. Biesta, Keita Takayama, Margaret Kettle","doi":"10.1080/1359866X.2021.1974152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The papers in this issue are all concerned with teachers and teaching. Therefore, in this editorial, we want to frame the issue by briefly raising some questions about how teaching is seen, in both senses of the word. We are interested in asking about how the value judgements made about teaching are formulated and enacted and by whom, and the ways that “visibility” “operates.” We wonder about the standardisations that teachers and therefore, as a flow on, teacher educators, work with. How does the “state” “see” (Scott, 1998) “us”our teaching, and as teachers? At present, at least in many places in the “Anglophone West,” teaching, curricula, and assessment are standardised. The questions raised here arise primarily from the point of view of this “Anglophone West” and we acknowledge the parochial limitations and particularities of this view.","PeriodicalId":47276,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","volume":"49 1","pages":"363 - 369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How is teaching seen? Raising questions about the part of teachers and their educators in the production of educational (non)sense\",\"authors\":\"S. Heimans, G. Biesta, Keita Takayama, Margaret Kettle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1359866X.2021.1974152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The papers in this issue are all concerned with teachers and teaching. Therefore, in this editorial, we want to frame the issue by briefly raising some questions about how teaching is seen, in both senses of the word. We are interested in asking about how the value judgements made about teaching are formulated and enacted and by whom, and the ways that “visibility” “operates.” We wonder about the standardisations that teachers and therefore, as a flow on, teacher educators, work with. How does the “state” “see” (Scott, 1998) “us”our teaching, and as teachers? At present, at least in many places in the “Anglophone West,” teaching, curricula, and assessment are standardised. The questions raised here arise primarily from the point of view of this “Anglophone West” and we acknowledge the parochial limitations and particularities of this view.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"363 - 369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1974152\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1974152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
How is teaching seen? Raising questions about the part of teachers and their educators in the production of educational (non)sense
The papers in this issue are all concerned with teachers and teaching. Therefore, in this editorial, we want to frame the issue by briefly raising some questions about how teaching is seen, in both senses of the word. We are interested in asking about how the value judgements made about teaching are formulated and enacted and by whom, and the ways that “visibility” “operates.” We wonder about the standardisations that teachers and therefore, as a flow on, teacher educators, work with. How does the “state” “see” (Scott, 1998) “us”our teaching, and as teachers? At present, at least in many places in the “Anglophone West,” teaching, curricula, and assessment are standardised. The questions raised here arise primarily from the point of view of this “Anglophone West” and we acknowledge the parochial limitations and particularities of this view.
期刊介绍:
This journal promotes rigorous research that makes a significant contribution to advancing knowledge in teacher education across early childhood, primary, secondary, vocational education and training, and higher education. The journal editors invite for peer review theoretically informed papers - including, but not limited to, empirically grounded research - which focus on significant issues relevant to an international audience in regards to: Teacher education (including initial teacher education and ongoing professional education) of teachers internationally; The cultural, economic, political, social and/or technological dimensions and contexts of teacher education; Change, stability, reform and resistance in (and relating to) teacher education; Improving the quality and impact of research in teacher education.