如何看待教学?对教师及其教育者在教育(非)意义产生中的作用提出质疑

IF 1.4 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education Pub Date : 2021-08-08 DOI:10.1080/1359866X.2021.1974152
S. Heimans, G. Biesta, Keita Takayama, Margaret Kettle
{"title":"如何看待教学?对教师及其教育者在教育(非)意义产生中的作用提出质疑","authors":"S. Heimans, G. Biesta, Keita Takayama, Margaret Kettle","doi":"10.1080/1359866X.2021.1974152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The papers in this issue are all concerned with teachers and teaching. Therefore, in this editorial, we want to frame the issue by briefly raising some questions about how teaching is seen, in both senses of the word. We are interested in asking about how the value judgements made about teaching are formulated and enacted and by whom, and the ways that “visibility” “operates.” We wonder about the standardisations that teachers and therefore, as a flow on, teacher educators, work with. How does the “state” “see” (Scott, 1998) “us”our teaching, and as teachers? At present, at least in many places in the “Anglophone West,” teaching, curricula, and assessment are standardised. The questions raised here arise primarily from the point of view of this “Anglophone West” and we acknowledge the parochial limitations and particularities of this view.","PeriodicalId":47276,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","volume":"49 1","pages":"363 - 369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How is teaching seen? Raising questions about the part of teachers and their educators in the production of educational (non)sense\",\"authors\":\"S. Heimans, G. Biesta, Keita Takayama, Margaret Kettle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1359866X.2021.1974152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The papers in this issue are all concerned with teachers and teaching. Therefore, in this editorial, we want to frame the issue by briefly raising some questions about how teaching is seen, in both senses of the word. We are interested in asking about how the value judgements made about teaching are formulated and enacted and by whom, and the ways that “visibility” “operates.” We wonder about the standardisations that teachers and therefore, as a flow on, teacher educators, work with. How does the “state” “see” (Scott, 1998) “us”our teaching, and as teachers? At present, at least in many places in the “Anglophone West,” teaching, curricula, and assessment are standardised. The questions raised here arise primarily from the point of view of this “Anglophone West” and we acknowledge the parochial limitations and particularities of this view.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"363 - 369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1974152\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1974152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这期的论文都是关于教师和教学的。因此,在这篇社论中,我们想通过简单地提出一些关于如何看待教学的问题来界定这个问题,无论是从这个词的两个意义上来说。我们有兴趣询问关于教学的价值判断是如何制定和实施的,由谁制定和实施,以及“可见性”的运作方式。“国家”如何“看待”(Scott,1998)“我们”我们的教学,以及作为教师?目前,至少在“英语国家西部”的许多地方,教学、课程和评估都是标准化的。这里提出的问题主要来自这个“讲英语的西方”的观点,我们承认这种观点的狭隘局限性和特殊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How is teaching seen? Raising questions about the part of teachers and their educators in the production of educational (non)sense
The papers in this issue are all concerned with teachers and teaching. Therefore, in this editorial, we want to frame the issue by briefly raising some questions about how teaching is seen, in both senses of the word. We are interested in asking about how the value judgements made about teaching are formulated and enacted and by whom, and the ways that “visibility” “operates.” We wonder about the standardisations that teachers and therefore, as a flow on, teacher educators, work with. How does the “state” “see” (Scott, 1998) “us”our teaching, and as teachers? At present, at least in many places in the “Anglophone West,” teaching, curricula, and assessment are standardised. The questions raised here arise primarily from the point of view of this “Anglophone West” and we acknowledge the parochial limitations and particularities of this view.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: This journal promotes rigorous research that makes a significant contribution to advancing knowledge in teacher education across early childhood, primary, secondary, vocational education and training, and higher education. The journal editors invite for peer review theoretically informed papers - including, but not limited to, empirically grounded research - which focus on significant issues relevant to an international audience in regards to: Teacher education (including initial teacher education and ongoing professional education) of teachers internationally; The cultural, economic, political, social and/or technological dimensions and contexts of teacher education; Change, stability, reform and resistance in (and relating to) teacher education; Improving the quality and impact of research in teacher education.
期刊最新文献
Preschool educators’ use of commanding language in China and Japan: a cross-cultural comparative study Making teacher educators’ experiences visible: seeing inside the hopeful and ambiguous dimensions of practice Second language teacher professional development: Technological innovations for post-emergency teacher education “Can’t you just tell us when to teach them how to use an apostrophe?” The worthwhile struggle to cultivate agential preservice teachers in a compliance culture How ‘academic’ should academic writing be? Or: why form should follow function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1