元认知在行动中作为库存流动失败的可能解释

IF 1.7 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT System Dynamics Review Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI:10.1002/sdr.1692
Gürsu Aşιk, Zerrin Doğança Küçük
{"title":"元认知在行动中作为库存流动失败的可能解释","authors":"Gürsu Aşιk, Zerrin Doğança Küçük","doi":"10.1002/sdr.1692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims at examining the role of metacognition, which refers to one ’ s ability to control and regulate their own thinking process through various activities in assessing dynamics of stocks and fl ows. The fi rst research question focuses on the metacognitive activities used by individuals who solved such tasks correctly and who did not. The second question focuses on how successfully participants organized their thinking processes to arrive at a correct answer when prompted and permitted to retry. Forty undergraduate students were involved in the study, and concurrent think-aloud protocol was used to examine their thinking when per- forming two stock- fl ow tasks. The fi ndings revealed that participants tend to have dif fi culties in reading, planning, monitoring, and checking activities. The effectiveness of metacognitive activi- ties employed by the participants is likely to decrease from reading to checking, respectively. The study contributes to our understanding of metacognitive de fi ciencies in stock- fl ow failure and provides further research suggestions. Review on behalf of System Dynamics Society.","PeriodicalId":51500,"journal":{"name":"System Dynamics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metacognition in action as a possible explanation for\\n stock‐flow\\n failure\",\"authors\":\"Gürsu Aşιk, Zerrin Doğança Küçük\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sdr.1692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims at examining the role of metacognition, which refers to one ’ s ability to control and regulate their own thinking process through various activities in assessing dynamics of stocks and fl ows. The fi rst research question focuses on the metacognitive activities used by individuals who solved such tasks correctly and who did not. The second question focuses on how successfully participants organized their thinking processes to arrive at a correct answer when prompted and permitted to retry. Forty undergraduate students were involved in the study, and concurrent think-aloud protocol was used to examine their thinking when per- forming two stock- fl ow tasks. The fi ndings revealed that participants tend to have dif fi culties in reading, planning, monitoring, and checking activities. The effectiveness of metacognitive activi- ties employed by the participants is likely to decrease from reading to checking, respectively. The study contributes to our understanding of metacognitive de fi ciencies in stock- fl ow failure and provides further research suggestions. Review on behalf of System Dynamics Society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System Dynamics Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System Dynamics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1692\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System Dynamics Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1692","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在检验元认知的作用,元认知是指一个人通过评估股票和股票动态的各种活动来控制和调节自己思维过程的能力。第一个研究问题集中在正确解决此类任务和未正确解决此类问题的个人所使用的元认知活动上。第二个问题的重点是参与者如何成功地组织他们的思维过程,在被提示并允许重试时得出正确答案。40名本科生参与了这项研究,并使用并行大声思考协议来检查他们在完成两项存量任务时的思维。研究结果表明,参与者在阅读、计划、监控和检查活动方面往往存在困难。从阅读到检查,参与者使用的元认知活动的有效性可能会分别降低。该研究有助于我们理解股票流动失败中的元认知缺陷,并提供进一步的研究建议。代表系统动力学学会进行评审。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Metacognition in action as a possible explanation for stock‐flow failure
This study aims at examining the role of metacognition, which refers to one ’ s ability to control and regulate their own thinking process through various activities in assessing dynamics of stocks and fl ows. The fi rst research question focuses on the metacognitive activities used by individuals who solved such tasks correctly and who did not. The second question focuses on how successfully participants organized their thinking processes to arrive at a correct answer when prompted and permitted to retry. Forty undergraduate students were involved in the study, and concurrent think-aloud protocol was used to examine their thinking when per- forming two stock- fl ow tasks. The fi ndings revealed that participants tend to have dif fi culties in reading, planning, monitoring, and checking activities. The effectiveness of metacognitive activi- ties employed by the participants is likely to decrease from reading to checking, respectively. The study contributes to our understanding of metacognitive de fi ciencies in stock- fl ow failure and provides further research suggestions. Review on behalf of System Dynamics Society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The System Dynamics Review exists to communicate to a wide audience advances in the application of the perspectives and methods of system dynamics to societal, technical, managerial, and environmental problems. The Review publishes: advances in mathematical modelling and computer simulation of dynamic feedback systems; advances in methods of policy analysis based on information feedback and circular causality; generic structures (dynamic feedback systems that support particular widely applicable behavioural insights); system dynamics contributions to theory building in the social and natural sciences; policy studies and debate emphasizing the role of feedback and circular causality in problem behaviour.
期刊最新文献
ARCHIVE PAPER: Micro worlds versus boundary objects in group model building: evidence from the literature on problem definition and model conceptualization (2007) Values‐based food procurement: Black farmers and structural racism in New York State Minding the abstraction gap: approaches supporting implementation Using system dynamics to support a functional exercise for pandemic preparedness and response A complete shortest independent loop set algorithm for model structure analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1