布拉格风格变化的启示——卡尔·海因里希·赛伯特关于“写作类型”差异的论述(1768)

Karsten Rinas
{"title":"布拉格风格变化的启示——卡尔·海因里希·赛伯特关于“写作类型”差异的论述(1768)","authors":"Karsten Rinas","doi":"10.15452/studiagermanistica.2022.30.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses an essay by Karl Heinrich Seibt on differences in writing styles. The essay was published in Prague in 1768. It reflects important changes in writing practices that occurred in the Age of Enlightenment. Seibt’s essay is interesting because it recommends the usage of very progressive writing styles that come close to early Romantic approaches (the ‘Sturm und Drang’). On the other hand, Seibt also defends a very traditional (periodical) style in official or formal contexts. It is argued that this sharp contrast is a consequence of Seibt’s difficult role as a teacher of modern language style in the traditional Habsburg Empire.","PeriodicalId":36094,"journal":{"name":"Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Ostravienis Studia Germanistica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aufgeklärter Stilwandel in Prag: Karl Heinrich Seibts Abhandlung über die Unterschiede der „Schreibarten“ (1768)\",\"authors\":\"Karsten Rinas\",\"doi\":\"10.15452/studiagermanistica.2022.30.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses an essay by Karl Heinrich Seibt on differences in writing styles. The essay was published in Prague in 1768. It reflects important changes in writing practices that occurred in the Age of Enlightenment. Seibt’s essay is interesting because it recommends the usage of very progressive writing styles that come close to early Romantic approaches (the ‘Sturm und Drang’). On the other hand, Seibt also defends a very traditional (periodical) style in official or formal contexts. It is argued that this sharp contrast is a consequence of Seibt’s difficult role as a teacher of modern language style in the traditional Habsburg Empire.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Ostravienis Studia Germanistica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Ostravienis Studia Germanistica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15452/studiagermanistica.2022.30.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Ostravienis Studia Germanistica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15452/studiagermanistica.2022.30.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了卡尔·海因里希·赛伯特关于写作风格差异的一篇文章。这篇文章于1768年在布拉格发表。它反映了启蒙时代写作实践的重要变化。赛伯特的文章很有趣,因为它建议使用非常进步的写作风格,接近早期的浪漫主义风格(“Sturm und Drang”)。另一方面,Seibt也为官方或正式场合中非常传统的(期刊)风格辩护。有人认为,这种鲜明的对比是赛比特在传统的哈布斯堡帝国中作为现代语言风格的教师所扮演的艰难角色的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aufgeklärter Stilwandel in Prag: Karl Heinrich Seibts Abhandlung über die Unterschiede der „Schreibarten“ (1768)
This article discusses an essay by Karl Heinrich Seibt on differences in writing styles. The essay was published in Prague in 1768. It reflects important changes in writing practices that occurred in the Age of Enlightenment. Seibt’s essay is interesting because it recommends the usage of very progressive writing styles that come close to early Romantic approaches (the ‘Sturm und Drang’). On the other hand, Seibt also defends a very traditional (periodical) style in official or formal contexts. It is argued that this sharp contrast is a consequence of Seibt’s difficult role as a teacher of modern language style in the traditional Habsburg Empire.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Ostravienis Studia Germanistica
Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Ostravienis Studia Germanistica Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Paratexte, ohne die es keine Literatur gäbe. Zur Rezeption des Werkes von Paul Celan und der Funktion von Paratexten in der totalitären Tschechoslowakei (1948–1989) Kultur und Kulturtransfer aus translationsrelevanter Sicht. Begriffsklärung und Modellierung des Kulturtransfers im Rahmen der literarischen Übersetzung Prometheische Herrscherfiguren. Franz Grillparzers König Ottokar und Kaiser Mathias Musikfachwörter in fachfremden Kontexten Goethe als Sprachhistoriker
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1