{"title":"词汇和克里奥尔语的构成","authors":"Mauro Fernández, Eeva Sippola","doi":"10.1075/jpcl.00095.fer","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n There is disagreement as to the formation period of Chabacano, Philippine Creole Spanish. This article examines\n lexical items that have been claimed to stem from an early period of formation of Chabacano (Jacobs & Parkvall 2020). As a response to these claims, we show with ample dialectological and diachronic evidence\n that Chabacano items ansina ‘this way, like this,’ endenantes ‘a little while ago’,\n onde ‘where,’ and vos ‘2sg’ are compatible with any period of formation for the Creole.\n Consequently, the presence of these lexical items in the Chabacano varieties does not link their formation to a hypothetical\n proto-Creole created before 1640, nor does it lend proof to the hypothesis that the current varieties descend directly from it. In\n general, we argue that creoles require as rigorous diachronic and diatopic studies as their lexifiers to show the maturity of\n Creole Studies as a field of inquiry.","PeriodicalId":43608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The lexicon and creole formation\",\"authors\":\"Mauro Fernández, Eeva Sippola\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jpcl.00095.fer\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n There is disagreement as to the formation period of Chabacano, Philippine Creole Spanish. This article examines\\n lexical items that have been claimed to stem from an early period of formation of Chabacano (Jacobs & Parkvall 2020). As a response to these claims, we show with ample dialectological and diachronic evidence\\n that Chabacano items ansina ‘this way, like this,’ endenantes ‘a little while ago’,\\n onde ‘where,’ and vos ‘2sg’ are compatible with any period of formation for the Creole.\\n Consequently, the presence of these lexical items in the Chabacano varieties does not link their formation to a hypothetical\\n proto-Creole created before 1640, nor does it lend proof to the hypothesis that the current varieties descend directly from it. In\\n general, we argue that creoles require as rigorous diachronic and diatopic studies as their lexifiers to show the maturity of\\n Creole Studies as a field of inquiry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00095.fer\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00095.fer","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
There is disagreement as to the formation period of Chabacano, Philippine Creole Spanish. This article examines
lexical items that have been claimed to stem from an early period of formation of Chabacano (Jacobs & Parkvall 2020). As a response to these claims, we show with ample dialectological and diachronic evidence
that Chabacano items ansina ‘this way, like this,’ endenantes ‘a little while ago’,
onde ‘where,’ and vos ‘2sg’ are compatible with any period of formation for the Creole.
Consequently, the presence of these lexical items in the Chabacano varieties does not link their formation to a hypothetical
proto-Creole created before 1640, nor does it lend proof to the hypothesis that the current varieties descend directly from it. In
general, we argue that creoles require as rigorous diachronic and diatopic studies as their lexifiers to show the maturity of
Creole Studies as a field of inquiry.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages (JPCL) aims to provide a forum for the scholarly study of pidgins, creoles, and other contact language varieties, from multi-disciplinary perspectives. The journal places special emphasis on current research devoted to empirical description, theoretical issues, and the broader implications of the study of contact languages for theories of language acquisition and change, and for linguistic theory in general. The editors also encourage contributions that explore the application of linguistic research to language planning, education, and social reform, as well as studies that examine the role of contact languages in the social life and culture, including the literature, of their communities.