图书馆编目中的体裁/形式获取:LCGFT使用现状调查

IF 0.6 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Library Resources & Technical Services Pub Date : 2020-05-08 DOI:10.5860/lrts.64n2.44
Colin Bitter, Yuji Tosaka
{"title":"图书馆编目中的体裁/形式获取:LCGFT使用现状调查","authors":"Colin Bitter, Yuji Tosaka","doi":"10.5860/lrts.64n2.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study provides analysis of a large online survey that was distributed to the cataloging community in 2018. The survey aimed to answer a number of important research questions to gain a general sense of the current state of Library of Congress Genre/Form Terms (LCGFT) usage. Findings include an overall broad acceptance of LCGFT, suggesting that the LCGFT project has been successfully embraced as a new controlled vocabulary; however, the adoption of the vocabulary remains uneven, especially between different types of institutions and different areas of the LCGFT vocabulary. Additionally, training points to a much-needed area for improvement as the survey found that the vast majority of non-users of LCGFT had never received vocabulary training. Survey results also suggest that retrospective LCGFT application, particularly using automated means, presents forthcoming challenges for librarians and library IT staff. Despite these limitations and challenges, survey results make it clear that LCGFT has become a widely accepted part of the bibliographic universe that helps to make genre and form information explicitly accessible to library users.","PeriodicalId":18197,"journal":{"name":"Library Resources & Technical Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genre/Form Access in Library Catalogs: A Survey on the Current State of LCGFT Usage\",\"authors\":\"Colin Bitter, Yuji Tosaka\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/lrts.64n2.44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study provides analysis of a large online survey that was distributed to the cataloging community in 2018. The survey aimed to answer a number of important research questions to gain a general sense of the current state of Library of Congress Genre/Form Terms (LCGFT) usage. Findings include an overall broad acceptance of LCGFT, suggesting that the LCGFT project has been successfully embraced as a new controlled vocabulary; however, the adoption of the vocabulary remains uneven, especially between different types of institutions and different areas of the LCGFT vocabulary. Additionally, training points to a much-needed area for improvement as the survey found that the vast majority of non-users of LCGFT had never received vocabulary training. Survey results also suggest that retrospective LCGFT application, particularly using automated means, presents forthcoming challenges for librarians and library IT staff. Despite these limitations and challenges, survey results make it clear that LCGFT has become a widely accepted part of the bibliographic universe that helps to make genre and form information explicitly accessible to library users.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Library Resources & Technical Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Library Resources & Technical Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.64n2.44\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Resources & Technical Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.64n2.44","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

这项研究对2018年分发给编目社区的一项大型在线调查进行了分析。该调查旨在回答一些重要的研究问题,以全面了解美国国会图书馆体裁/形式术语(LCGFT)的使用现状。研究结果包括对LCGFT的总体广泛接受,表明LCGFT项目已被成功地接受为一个新的受控词汇;然而,词汇的采用仍然不均衡,尤其是在不同类型的机构和LCGFT词汇的不同领域之间。此外,培训指出了一个急需改进的领域,因为调查发现,绝大多数非LCGFT用户从未接受过词汇培训。调查结果还表明,LCGFT的回顾性应用,特别是使用自动化手段,给图书馆员和图书馆IT人员带来了即将到来的挑战。尽管存在这些限制和挑战,但调查结果表明,LCGFT已成为书目世界中被广泛接受的一部分,有助于图书馆用户明确地访问类型和形式信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genre/Form Access in Library Catalogs: A Survey on the Current State of LCGFT Usage
This study provides analysis of a large online survey that was distributed to the cataloging community in 2018. The survey aimed to answer a number of important research questions to gain a general sense of the current state of Library of Congress Genre/Form Terms (LCGFT) usage. Findings include an overall broad acceptance of LCGFT, suggesting that the LCGFT project has been successfully embraced as a new controlled vocabulary; however, the adoption of the vocabulary remains uneven, especially between different types of institutions and different areas of the LCGFT vocabulary. Additionally, training points to a much-needed area for improvement as the survey found that the vast majority of non-users of LCGFT had never received vocabulary training. Survey results also suggest that retrospective LCGFT application, particularly using automated means, presents forthcoming challenges for librarians and library IT staff. Despite these limitations and challenges, survey results make it clear that LCGFT has become a widely accepted part of the bibliographic universe that helps to make genre and form information explicitly accessible to library users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Library Resources & Technical Services
Library Resources & Technical Services INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Library Resources & Technical Services (LRTS) is a peer-reviewed journal that takes a critical approach to the questions and challenges facing librarians and libraries with regard to: Collections Scholarly communication Preservation (including digitization) Acquisitions (including licensing and economic aspects of acquisitions) Continuing resources Cataloging (including descriptive metadata, authority control, subject analysis, and classification)
期刊最新文献
Core Competencies for Cataloging and Metadata Professional Librarians: Assessment of Community Use and Recommendations for the Future of the Document Evaluating Purchase Plans for Niche Collecting Areas The Work in Question Book Review: Making the Most of Your ILS: A User’s Guide to Evaluating and Optimizing Library Systems Book Review: Taxonomies: Practical Approaches to Developing and Managing Vocabularies for Digital Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1