{"title":"通过自反性颠覆权力:研究人员和教师与尼泊尔达利特人合作的新可能性","authors":"Sudeep Khanal, C. Charles","doi":"10.1080/1359866X.2022.2058912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Sociologists of education have shown that schooling tends to favour the most powerful groups and that even well-intentioned researchers can run the risk of perpetuating some of the very power structures we seek to critique. In this paper we explore how a male, Brahmin researcher from Nepal (the highest caste group in Nepalese society) attempted to disrupt power in researching the educational experiences of the lowest caste group – the Dalits – in one public school in Nepal. Drawing on ethnographic data generated in the field, alongside feminist theorising about reflexivity and power in research, we illuminate daily events in the life of a government school in Nepal that worked to reproduce power, including interactions that were witnessed between a range of actors in the field. We consider how the researcher’s reflexivity enabled him to recognise power and attempt to disrupt it. We argue that the focus on the “how” of research – with power at the forefront of our thinking – can lead to seeing things in the field in new ways, with the potential to influence future research and teaching in the Nepalese context in order to work towards justice for Dalit students.","PeriodicalId":47276,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disrupting power through reflexivity: new possibilities for researchers and teachers working with Dalits in Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Sudeep Khanal, C. Charles\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1359866X.2022.2058912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Sociologists of education have shown that schooling tends to favour the most powerful groups and that even well-intentioned researchers can run the risk of perpetuating some of the very power structures we seek to critique. In this paper we explore how a male, Brahmin researcher from Nepal (the highest caste group in Nepalese society) attempted to disrupt power in researching the educational experiences of the lowest caste group – the Dalits – in one public school in Nepal. Drawing on ethnographic data generated in the field, alongside feminist theorising about reflexivity and power in research, we illuminate daily events in the life of a government school in Nepal that worked to reproduce power, including interactions that were witnessed between a range of actors in the field. We consider how the researcher’s reflexivity enabled him to recognise power and attempt to disrupt it. We argue that the focus on the “how” of research – with power at the forefront of our thinking – can lead to seeing things in the field in new ways, with the potential to influence future research and teaching in the Nepalese context in order to work towards justice for Dalit students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2022.2058912\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2022.2058912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disrupting power through reflexivity: new possibilities for researchers and teachers working with Dalits in Nepal
ABSTRACT Sociologists of education have shown that schooling tends to favour the most powerful groups and that even well-intentioned researchers can run the risk of perpetuating some of the very power structures we seek to critique. In this paper we explore how a male, Brahmin researcher from Nepal (the highest caste group in Nepalese society) attempted to disrupt power in researching the educational experiences of the lowest caste group – the Dalits – in one public school in Nepal. Drawing on ethnographic data generated in the field, alongside feminist theorising about reflexivity and power in research, we illuminate daily events in the life of a government school in Nepal that worked to reproduce power, including interactions that were witnessed between a range of actors in the field. We consider how the researcher’s reflexivity enabled him to recognise power and attempt to disrupt it. We argue that the focus on the “how” of research – with power at the forefront of our thinking – can lead to seeing things in the field in new ways, with the potential to influence future research and teaching in the Nepalese context in order to work towards justice for Dalit students.
期刊介绍:
This journal promotes rigorous research that makes a significant contribution to advancing knowledge in teacher education across early childhood, primary, secondary, vocational education and training, and higher education. The journal editors invite for peer review theoretically informed papers - including, but not limited to, empirically grounded research - which focus on significant issues relevant to an international audience in regards to: Teacher education (including initial teacher education and ongoing professional education) of teachers internationally; The cultural, economic, political, social and/or technological dimensions and contexts of teacher education; Change, stability, reform and resistance in (and relating to) teacher education; Improving the quality and impact of research in teacher education.