教师表扬训斥比:有EBD风险学生与正常发展同伴的行为反应

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Education and Treatment of Children Pub Date : 2019-10-08 DOI:10.1353/etc.2019.0021
Paul Caldarella, Ross Larsen, L. Williams, Howard P. Wills, J. Wehby
{"title":"教师表扬训斥比:有EBD风险学生与正常发展同伴的行为反应","authors":"Paul Caldarella, Ross Larsen, L. Williams, Howard P. Wills, J. Wehby","doi":"10.1353/etc.2019.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) often receive low rates of teacher praise and high rates of teacher reprimands, though they may respond more positively to praise and more negatively to reprimands than their typically developing peers. Teacher praise-to-reprimand ratios (PRRs) are associated with increased student engagement, but more research is necessary to further explore how these ratios affect student behavior, particularly for students with or at risk for EBD. Commonly 3:1 or 4:1 is recommended as a desirable PRR, but students with EBD may need higher ratios to improve their classroom behavior. In our study of 540 students and 149 teachers, we found that as teacher PRR increased the engagement of at-risk students increased, though engagement for typically developing peers did not. A PRR of approximately 9:1 was needed for students at risk for EBD to approximate the engagement levels of their typically developing peers. No effect of PRR on disruption rates was found for either student category.","PeriodicalId":51493,"journal":{"name":"Education and Treatment of Children","volume":"42 1","pages":"447 - 468"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/etc.2019.0021","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teacher Praise-to-Reprimand Ratios: Behavioral Response of Students at Risk for EBD Compared with Typically Developing Peers\",\"authors\":\"Paul Caldarella, Ross Larsen, L. Williams, Howard P. Wills, J. Wehby\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/etc.2019.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) often receive low rates of teacher praise and high rates of teacher reprimands, though they may respond more positively to praise and more negatively to reprimands than their typically developing peers. Teacher praise-to-reprimand ratios (PRRs) are associated with increased student engagement, but more research is necessary to further explore how these ratios affect student behavior, particularly for students with or at risk for EBD. Commonly 3:1 or 4:1 is recommended as a desirable PRR, but students with EBD may need higher ratios to improve their classroom behavior. In our study of 540 students and 149 teachers, we found that as teacher PRR increased the engagement of at-risk students increased, though engagement for typically developing peers did not. A PRR of approximately 9:1 was needed for students at risk for EBD to approximate the engagement levels of their typically developing peers. No effect of PRR on disruption rates was found for either student category.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Treatment of Children\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"447 - 468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/etc.2019.0021\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Treatment of Children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2019.0021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Treatment of Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2019.0021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

摘要:情绪和行为障碍(EBD)学生通常得到较低的教师表扬率和较高的教师训斥率,尽管他们对表扬的反应可能比正常发展的同龄人更积极,对训斥的反应更消极。教师的表扬训斥比(PRRs)与学生参与度的提高有关,但需要更多的研究来进一步探讨这些比例如何影响学生的行为,特别是对患有或有患EBD风险的学生。通常推荐3:1或4:1作为理想的PRR,但患有EBD的学生可能需要更高的比例来改善他们的课堂行为。在我们对540名学生和149名教师的研究中,我们发现,随着教师PRR的增加,有风险的学生的参与度增加了,尽管典型发展的同龄人的参与度没有增加。有EBD风险的学生需要大约9:1的PRR来接近他们正常发展的同龄人的参与水平。没有发现PRR对两类学生的干扰率有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teacher Praise-to-Reprimand Ratios: Behavioral Response of Students at Risk for EBD Compared with Typically Developing Peers
Abstract:Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) often receive low rates of teacher praise and high rates of teacher reprimands, though they may respond more positively to praise and more negatively to reprimands than their typically developing peers. Teacher praise-to-reprimand ratios (PRRs) are associated with increased student engagement, but more research is necessary to further explore how these ratios affect student behavior, particularly for students with or at risk for EBD. Commonly 3:1 or 4:1 is recommended as a desirable PRR, but students with EBD may need higher ratios to improve their classroom behavior. In our study of 540 students and 149 teachers, we found that as teacher PRR increased the engagement of at-risk students increased, though engagement for typically developing peers did not. A PRR of approximately 9:1 was needed for students at risk for EBD to approximate the engagement levels of their typically developing peers. No effect of PRR on disruption rates was found for either student category.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Education and Treatment of Children (ETC) is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning the development of services for children and youth who are at risk for or experiencing emotional or behavioral problems. A primary criterion for publication is that the material be of direct value to educators, parents, child care providers, or mental health professionals in improving the effectiveness of their services. Therefore, authors are required to compose their manuscripts in a clear, concise style that will be readily understood by the practitioners who are likely to make use of the information.
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness- and Relationship-Based Interventions: Which Break is Better for Improving Classroom Behavior? Enhancing Ci3T Professional Learning: Initial Lessons Learned from Ci3T Implementers A Systematic Review of Explicit Instruction and Frequency Building Interventions to Teach Students to Write The Daily Report Card and Check-in/Check-out: A Commentary About Two Siloed Interventions Training Behavior Analysts as Strategic Scientists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1